AgResearch Falters in NZ Fashion Stakes
AgResearch Falters in NZ Fashion
Stakes (GE Free NZ press
release)
Fashion lovers attending New Zealand
Fashion Week were surprised to hear of AgResearch's
proposals for commercialising GE animals and many were
distinctly unimpressed by the plans.
A public vigil
organised by GE-Free NZ, SAFE and The Soil and Health
Association was held outside AgResearch's sponsored
show to encourage public submissions
on AgResearch's applications to ERMA.
A
menagerie of 'animals' greeted those attending the show and
flyers summarising the proposals were handed out as security
guards, police and even some off-duty models looked
on.
"It was a shock to many that the
same organisation promoting fine wools and innovative Kiwi
products on the one hand were also undermining the image of
Brand New Zealand with their plans for GE animals," says Jon
Carapiet from GE Free NZ in food and
environment.
The fact that none of the products on
show are the result of transgenics is evidence that
innovation through ethical use of science and
biotechnology is possible, and indeed necessary to protect
New Zealand's international standing.
But the
extreme proposals being made for GE animals by AgResearch
are an even more serious threat to New Zealand's brand
image than the recent contamination of milk at Fonterra's
Chinese subsiduary.
" We cannot have it both ways
and build our reputation as clean, green, and natural and at
the same time have AgResearch undermining those values, and
ignoring basic community expectations that they will be
protected," says Jon Carapiet.
Some visitors from
overseas even started to question the nature of the
AgResearch products already on show. They had to be
reassured that none were 'GE'd' because New Zealand has no
commercial GE animals or crops.
"There must be a
middle path of ethical biotechnolgy that can protect Brand
New Zealand, says Jon Carapiet. "But GE animals born with
deformities or milked for products that can be made in other
ways is not it."
AgResearch's vision must be
amended to be one that rejects cruelty and unethical
treatment of animals. Any failure to do so puts more than
animals at risk; it also threatens the environment and the
future of New Zealand's Brand reputation which doesn't
even belong to AgResearch, but to the nation as a
whole.
ENDS