Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Big Game Fishing Council & Anor v Sanford & Ors

NZ BIG GAME FISHING COUNCIL INC AND ANOR v SANFORD LIMITED AND ORS SC 40/2008
[2 October 2008]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
SC 40/2008
[2008] NZSC 74

BETWEEN NEW ZEALAND BIG GAME FISHING COUNCIL INC
First Appellant

AND THE NEW ZEALAND RECREATIONAL FISHING COUNCIL INC
Second Appellant

AND SANFORD LIMITED, SEALORD GROUP LIMITED AND PELAGIC & TUNA NEW ZEALAND LIMITED
First Respondents

AND MINISTER OF FISHERIES
Second Respondent

AND THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE MINISTRY OF FISHERIES
Third Respondent

Court: Elias CJ and McGrath J
Counsel: A R Galbraith QC and S Ryan for Appellants
B A Scott and G T Carter for First Respondent
A E L Ivory and P A McCarthy for Second and Third Respondents

Judgment: 2 October 2008

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

A The application for leave to appeal against the judgment of the Court of Appeal in Sanford Ltd v The New Zealand Recreational Fishing Council Inc [2008] NZCA 160 is granted.

B The approved ground of appeal is:
Did the Minister of Fisheries, when setting the total allowable commercial catch for Kahawai under s 21 of the Fisheries Act 1996 in 2004 and 2005, act in accordance with statutory requirements?

C The appellants’ application for leave to respond to the submissions of the respondents on the leave application is consequentially dismissed.

REASONS

[1] The application for leave to appeal is granted on the basis of the first appellant’s submissions of 6 August 2008 in support of granting leave. Having considered those submissions, along with submissions from the respondents each dated 27 August 2008, it was not necessary for the Court to address the further “factual context” submissions made for the appellants dated 3 September 2008. The appellants’ application for leave to file the further submissions in reply to those of the respondents is accordingly dismissed.

Solicitors:
Hesketh Henry, Auckland for Appellants
Chapman Tripp , Wellington for First Respondents
Crown Law Office, Wellington for Second and Third Respondents


[SC_40_2008_NZ_Big_Game_Fishing_Council.pdf]

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election