Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Road User Charges Bill will mean higher costs for motorists



Media Release: 21 February 2012

Road User Charges Bill will mean higher costs for motorists

The Road User Charges Bill just passed by Parliament will mean higher costs for the majority of diesel vehicle owners, says the New Zealand Automobile Association.

“While the new Bill simplifies the Road User Charges (RUC) system and reduces compliance costs and fraud, most diesel users will have to pay more,” says AA spokesperson Mark Stockdale.

“A vehicle will now be charged for the maximum weight it can carry, which assumes that cars are always carrying a full load, which is rarely the case. This is expected to result in an increase of $1.56 per 1,000 kilometres for a diesel car, or about an extra $23 per year for the average motorist.

“While not a large increase, this amounts to an extra $5 million a year across the entire fleet of 217,000 diesel cars and utes. On top of that, RUC fees are expected to increase again later this year along with the petrol tax.

“The new Bill sends the wrong message to diesel car owners. The Bill is a missed opportunity to encourage people into buying more fuel-efficient, environmentally-friendly diesels.”

The AA says a minority of very heavy diesel vehicle owners will benefit from the changes, at the expense of the majority of owners who will end up paying more. Ninety percent of RUC users are not heavy freight.

“In addition to higher RUC fees for cars, owners of large motorhomes will pay over double what they do now. This is despite motorhomes not causing any more damage to the road, and will be hard for owners who are often on fixed incomes. Other vehicles that do not carry heavy loads, like courier and furniture trucks, tow trucks and fire engines will also pay more. This will have a negative impact on many businesses who will pass on higher costs to their customers,” says Mr Stockdale.

“The Bill has moved away from the principle of users pays, whereby those who carried more weight paid more road tax Under the new regulations, vehicle owners who carry light loads will be subsidising the heaviest vehicles, and that’s plain wrong.

“The AA is disappointed the concerns of the majority of diesel vehicle owners have been ignored in the drafting of this Bill. However, some of these unfair and unintended consequences can still be addressed by changing the consequential regulations.”

The AA made strong submissions on the draft Bill, proposing including a lower RUC weight class for cars, creating a new class for motorhomes, and permitting commercial vehicle owners to nominate a lower weight for certain vehicle sub-classes that better reflects their operating weight.

• Diesel vehicle owners contribute about $1 billion a year in Road User Charges, compared to about $1.45b from petrol vehicle owners in fuel tax. These funds are used to maintain the land transport network.

Ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news