|
Imprisonment for child abuser sends the right message
Thursday, 8 November 2012, 1:29 pm
Press Release: Sensible Sentencing Trust
|
For immediate release:
Imprisonment for child abuser sends the right
message to society
and the
judiciary
The Sensible Sentencing Trust has
today welcomed the Court of Appeal’s ruling that home
detention for a child abuser was wrong, and instead imposed
imprisonment for 2 years, 5 months.
Spokesman Garth
McVicar said: “This was heinous offending by James Robert
Hall, the father of the four month old infant, who should
have been her protector, not her abuser.
“We are
delighted that the Solicitor-General heeded our call to
appeal the original sentence, and that the Court of Appeal
agreed with the outrage that many New Zealanders felt at the
original sentence given by Judge Mary Peters.
“We
hope this ruling sends a strong message to the public and
Judges, that child abuse will not be tolerated in New
Zealand.” ENDS
© Scoop Media

Public Address Link:
A (Sweary) Analysis Of Urgency Abuse And
The Consititution
Keith Ng: You’re looking at the Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) for the Public Health and Disability Amendment Bill. Basically, the courts said that the Government had to pay family members who looked after people with disabilities (because not doing so was discriminatory), so the Government passed this law to say: “Yeah nah.”
The RIS isn’t just redacted for the public – it was redacted for MPs. *Parliament* voted on this, with all the relevant facts blacked out.
Sure, it’s understandable, right? If you’re passing a law that’s really dodgy, you don’t want advice from civil servants saying “uh, this is pretty illegal” to be public. But actually, that’s not really a problem here, because in the same piece of legislation, THEY SAID THEY CAN’T BE TAKEN TO COURT. More>>