Louisa Wall Breaks Promise to New Zealanders

“Louisa Wall promised New Zealanders when introducing the Marriage (definition of) Amendment Bill to Parliament that no person would have to solemnise a marriage if it is against their beliefs. She is now breaking that promise, by supporting wording that will guarantee this protection to only a limited few (specifically those celebrants acting in official capacity for a church, where that church is opposed to that marriage taking place).”

“For someone who purports to oppose discrimination, it is surprising to see her willingness to discriminate against the many celebrants who choose not to be religiously affiliated. Surely all celebrants and registrars should be treated as equals in the eyes of the law,” says Mr Craig.

“Ms Wall is simply behind the times. In fact only 32% of marriages are conducted by a church or organisational celebrant, and Ms Wall should honour her promise, to ensure that the protection of belief and conscience is extended to all persons solemnising marriages. This is after all what she promised. It is naïve, and plainly wrong, to think that only those with official church status have beliefs that conflict with same sex marriage.”

Conservative Party Leader, Colin Craig, has today written to all MPs, urging them to support a revised amendment to the Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Bill to ensure the rights of New Zealanders to act according to their beliefs are protected.

“It is also notable that there is also no provision to protect church buildings or facilities,” says Mr Craig. “It has now been publically acknowledged that where these facilities are available to the public, (and many churches, temples and mosques make their facilities available to the public often at little or no charge as a service to the community) they will not be able to prevent them being used for same sex marriages even where this would be against the beliefs of that Church, Temple or Mosque.”

“Sadly”, says Mr Craig, “overseas experience suggests the likely outcome is that these facilities will no longer be made available to the public, and that will be a great loss to the community."

"I don’t see why an exemption could not have been allowed as per the Crown Law advice to the Select Committee. After all the buildings are privately owned and it is not unreasonable to have rules ensuring they are used in a way consistent with the religious beliefs of those who own them.”

Supplementary Details:

The amendment supported by Ms Wall (Limited exemption only)

5A (2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), no celebrant who is a minister of religion recognised by a religious body enumerated in schedule 1, and no celebrant who is a person nominated to solemnise marriages by an approved organisation, is obliged to solemnise a marriage if solemnising that marriage would contravene the religious beliefs of the religious body or the religious beliefs or philosophical or humanitarian convictions of the approved organisation.

The amendment supported by Colin Craig (General exemption)

5A (2) Without limiting the generality of subsection (1), no person is obliged to solemnise a marriage if to do so would be contrary to that person’s beliefs or conscience.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Gordon Campbell: On The 2013 Budget

Among Thursday’s main talking points:

We are apparently on track for a margin-of-error $75 million surplus, now in sight for 2014/15. But this sickly creature is hobbling out of the lab on the basis of all kinds of facilitative conjuring: such as trimming by $200 million the amount of new spending next time around.

With this strictly nominal surplus in sight, the 1984-ish justification for eternal austerity will have a news talisman: namely, getting Crown debt down to 20% of GDP by 2020. More>>

Budget Report, Lockup Audio & Images: Budget Day 2013 As always and especially after the managerial mishaps of the past few weeks and months, (e.g. Aaron Gilmore, the Mighty River Power share float, the GCSB mishaps) Budget Day 2013 was always going to be a pageant of reassurance... More>>

Budget 2013 Comment: Plain Sailing, But It's No America's Cup Pattrick Smellie: Compared to the last four budgets, this year's reflects an economy moving out of recession and into calmer waters... Yet if the fastest annual growth rate we can expect over the next two years is 3 percent - with the Christchurch rebuild in full swing - then you'd have to say New Zealand's underlying low-growth problem is far from fixed. More>>

Auckland Discord: Govt’s Power Hungry Housing Approach A Threat - Labour

Last week the Government said this, ‘The Government commits not to use any proposed or existing powers ... to override the council's planning and consenting processes’. But its housing Bill says this; ‘If an accord cannot be reached in an area of severe housing unaffordability, the Government can intervene by establishing special housing areas and issuing consents for developers’. More>>

ALSO:

• NZ Govt - Housing accords legislation passes first reading - Legislation For Housing Accords, Land Supply - Housing package improves affordability, access
• Greens - Budget numbers show National’s failure on home affordability
• Auckland Chamber of Commerce - Budget 2013: Housing intervention needed
• Out-Link - Gareth Morgan: Response to housing problem limp-wristed
• Earlier, Pre-Budget - Auckland Accord announced

Extending Protest Ban, Relaxing Permit Rules: Govt Abuses Urgency To Extend Anadarko Amendment

The Government is trying to pass legislation under urgency which would make the Anadarko Amendment – which limits protest at sea – apply to an additional 1.7 million square kilometres, the Green Party said today. More>>

ALSO:

• Parliament Today - Parliament Resumes To Pass Budget Bills
• Labour - Government to extend protest ban
• Greenpeace NZ - Oil Companies Lacking ‘Expertise’ and ‘Financial Ability’ Set to Be Handed Drilling Permits
• 2010 image via: Pacific.Scoop - Media watcher gives NZ press nil score card for China oil spill coverage