Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Living Wage at Auckland Council could cost ratepayers $17.2m

Media release

Auckland Councillor Cameron Brewer

Thursday, 23 May 2013

Living Wage at Auckland Council could cost ratepayers $17.2m annually

Following on the heels of Hamilton City Council, the adoption of a living wage policy at Auckland Council could be imminent and with the multi-million dollar cost set to be lumped straight onto suburban ratepayers, warns Auckland Councillor for Orakei Cameron Brewer.

Mr Brewer cited a report and minutes from the Council’s Auckland Plan Committee on 12 March, where a majority of councillors voted to ‘direct officers to undertake further work on the implications of introducing a living wage for Auckland Council and any implications for the wider Auckland economy…’

“This was despite a report very clearly stating that lifting the hourly rate for 1,544 council staff to $18.40 would cost ratepayers over $2.5 million, excluding Auckland Transport and Watercare. Likewise, if the so-called ‘Auckland Living Wage’ of $24.11 was introduced affecting 3,354 staff it would cost ratepayers over $17.2m per annum.

“The report also concluded that ‘initial analysis by Finance indicates that the increase in rates needed could be 0.2% and 1.2% respectively’. The increase on the council’s salary budget would be 0.6% and 4% respectively. And that’s excluding all the staff in the two massive CCOs Auckland Transport and Watercare, so the end cost would be much higher still. 

"Given just how stretched ratepayers are at the moment, it’s crazy that majority of councillors even voted for council staff to spend even more time and ratepayers' money investigating this."

"We have over 1,165 council staff earning over $100,000 with 123 of them earning over $200,000, an annual wage bill exceeding $670m, and now many councillors also want a living wage imposed on ratepayers! It's all very well for some businesses to pay a living wage, because their customers have choices, but in local government, ratepayers have no choice but to pay any extra costs passed onto them."

Back in March Mr Brewer moved an amendment to the motion, seconded by Christine Fletcher: ‘That any further work on the living wage be done on the proviso that any extra money required be found within the current $670m wage and salary staff budget of Auckland Council, not funded by a further rates increase.’

However Mr Brewer's amendment to let ratepayers off the hook was lost five votes to 10.

“A majority of councillors seem determined that the extra cost should fall straight onto suburban ratepayers. Let's not forget that most of our elderly ratepayers are battling on fixed incomes well below the minimum wage of $13.75 an hour. Yet struggling ratepayers could soon be forced to give up more of their income to fund a living wage policy for council staff.”

“The authors of the report presented to councillors in March noted the Government’s concern about the potential loss of jobs if the policy was adopted nationally and that ‘an increase in rates may also have an inflationary effect and create an economic deadweight loss to society’. Councillors need to take heed of these concerns, and ratepayers’ back-pockets, when this issue comes back to us,” says Mr Brewer.

SEE:
Auckland Plan Committee 12 March 2013
Item 12
Agenda link to the website:
http://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/EN/AboutCouncil/meetings_agendas/committees/Pages/aucklandfuturevisioncommittee.aspx


Ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news