Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Council should withdraw the draft Unitary Plan

NoMoreRates.com

The nationwide campaign to reform the present system of council rates.

Founder – David Thornton David@nomorerates.com

MEDIA RELEASE

27th May 2013

[statement from David Thornton]

Council is acting unlawfully and should withdraw the draft Unitary Plan.

Council has failed to meet consultation requirements of Local Government Act [Section 82} and Clause 3, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act.

By law the Council is required to consider alternative proposals when it notifies a proposed Unitary Plan under the Resource Management Act, and it is required to show the costs and benefits of the alternatives compared to its preferred Plan.

This consideration must be carried on during preparation of the draft plan and when consulting with relevant parties.

The Council is also required, under the Local Government Act, to seek alternative options, and their costs and benefits, before making any significant decisions.

What the Mayor calls ‘engagement’ is in fact a form of consultation and under the legislation Council is required to answer all submissions.

At most public meetings on the Unitary Plan there have been calls for details of the infrastructure that will be needed to support the wholesale rezoning the council is proposing to introduce.

Council needs to show costs of infrastructure for building up against cost of building out.

The claims by the Mayor, and by the council’s Director of Planning, that it is more expensive to provide infrastructure for building out than it is for building up, have not been supported by any evidence.

The council has not even considered building out as a genuine alternative to building up, despite such consideration being a legislative requirement in both the Resource Management Act and the Local Government Act.

David Thornton

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

PARLIAMENT TODAY:

Arming Police: Frontline Police To Routinely Carry Tasers

"In making the decision, the Police executive has considered almost five years worth of 'use of force' data… It consistently shows that the Taser is one of the least injury-causing tactical options available when compared with other options, with a subject injury rate of just over one per cent for all deployments." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On D-Day For Dairy At The TPP

While New Zealand may feel flattered at being called “the Saudi Arabia of milk” it would be more accurate to regard us as the suicide bombers of free trade. More>>

ALSO:

Leaked Letter: Severe Restrictions on State Owned Enterprises

Even an SOE that exists to fulfil a public function neglected by the market or which is a natural monopoly would nevertheless be forced to act "on the basis of commercial considerations" and would be prohibited from discriminating in favour of local businesses in purchases and sales. Foreign companies would be given standing to sue SOEs in domestic courts for perceived departures from the strictures of the TPP... More>>

ALSO:

"Gutted" Safety Bill: Time To Listen To Workplace Victims’ Families

Labour has listened to the families of whose loved ones have been killed at work and calls on other political parties to back its proposals to make workplaces safer and prevent unnecessary deaths on the job. More>>

ALSO:

Regulators: Govt To ‘Crowd-Source’ Regulatory Advice

A wide-ranging set of reforms is to be implemented to shake up the way New Zealand government agencies develop, write and implement regulations. More>>

ALSO:

Board Appointments: Some Minister Appoint Less The 3 In 10 Women

“It’s 2015 not 1915: Ministers who appoint less than 3 in 10 women to their boards must do better, they have no excuse but to do better,” said Dr Blue. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The 1990s Retro Proposals For Our Health System

As we learned yesterday, the reviews propose that the democratically elected representation on DHBs should be reduced, such that community wishes will be able to be over-ridden by political appointees. In today’s revelations, the reviews also propose a return to the destructive competitive health model of the 1990s. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news