Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Does sale of Meridian Energy comply with fiscal principles

29 October 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Does the partial sale of Meridian Energy comply with the government’s fiscal principles, as laid down in the Public Finance Act?

Now that the number of investors in Meridian Energy has been revealed at a disappointing 62,000 and the share price at launch has been set at the lowest end of the proposed value it is worth considering whether the government has been following its own rules in selling down the power company.

The government recently amended the Public Finance Act (PFA).  This is the law that ensures probity and the management of fiscal risks and requires the Treasury to carry out regular reporting on how government policy matches the principles in the Act,.  The principles include the following:
•          debt reduction and management of debt
•          ensuring that the government’s net worth provides a buffer for the future
•          prudently managing fiscal risks
•          ensuring efficiency and fairness in fiscal policy
•          considering the impact on present and future generations; and
•          ensuring that the Crown’s resources are managed effectively and efficiently 

The fiscal risks reporting framework explicitly includes asset sales and Treasury has twice advised about the risks of this course of action.  On 21 December last year Treasury was reported as advising against selling all three power companies in subsequent ‘sale windows’ because of the reduction of value likely to be returned by rapid sales. Their advice was that this would devalue the companies. The May 2013 budget forecasts report included a “changed” (i.e. worsening) fiscal risk from the proposed asset sales as follows:



the final amount and timing of any cash proceeds, forgone profits, the flow-on effects for the Crown and any implementation costs are uncertain, and may differ from what has been assumed in the fiscal forecasts”

There is therefore a strong argument to show that by persisting with the sale the government is not complying with its own recently revised legislation providing for prudent fiscal management.  This argument is based on the following reasons:

•          The new legislation’s principles – not to cut off future options, to provide a buffer for resilience, and in favour of intergenerational equity – are all in direct conflict with selling down publicly owned assets. Meridian Energy has been the government’s single biggest earning asset and share ownership will put its future infra-structure and development decisions outside of government control, adding risk to these areas.  How is this prudently managing financial risks?

•          Whether the true reason for the sales is portrayed as debt reduction or the ring-fenced “future investment fund” (as the investment in schools is being described) the case for asset sales was always dubious against any measure of fiscal responsibility. The costs to the government of debt servicing and of borrowing are at rates significantly less than cost of Meridian’s yields – how can that be construed as a fiscally responsible strategy?

•          Meridian Energy’s yields of 8% and more would have returned to government within a dozen years the amount gained by selling half of the company, and this return will be denied to future New Zealanders.  How does this ensure that the government’s net worth provides a buffer for the future?

•          The costs of sale, short-term subsidies for partial payment of shares, the reduction in cost to personal investors and the benefits to overseas based purchasers will see the NZ taxpayer effectively subsidise investors.  Partial privatisation cuts off other opportunities such as ending fuel poverty.  How does this make effective use of the Crown's resources or ensure efficiency and fairness in fiscal policy?

•          Finally there is no legal reason why the mixed ownership companies could not sell off generating capacity thus alienating in part even the publicly owned 51% of the assets.  This may seem far-fetched, and it is deemed by Treasury to be unlikely, but only last year the likelihood of Solid Energy becoming a worthless company would have seemed unthinkable.  How does this potential alienation of our rights as taxpayer owners of the 51% (reasonably) take into account the impact on present and future generations?

References
•          Media reports report  the Treasury has advised against the sale (and here), saying that they may not raise the expected revenue.
•          The 2013 budget forecast advice on specific fiscal risks from Treasury addresses the issue that the risk of selling its shareholding in State Owned Enterprises has changed for the worse.
•          Rod Oram describes how US legislation has determined the way the Mighty River and Meridian investments have been handled.
•          Treasury report overview of commercial issues related to the sale including the sale of generating capacity by partly privatised entities.
•          Public Finance Act

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

SCOOP COVERAGE: CHRISTCHURCH MOSQUES TERROR ATTACK


Detail Released: Firearms Buy-Back Scheme "Strikes Fair Balance"

Licensed firearms owners will get fair compensation for weapons handed in during the six-month buy-back and amnesty, Finance Minister Grant Robertson and Police Minister Stuart Nash announced today.

The fund available for the buy-back and amnesty has also increased by $40 million through a contribution from ACC. The total set aside for the scheme is now over $200 million. More>>

 

2020 Election Changes: Same Day Enrolment, Supermarket Voting

New Zealand’s democracy is to be enhanced, with voters gaining the right to enrol on election day at next year’s general election and allowing ballot boxes to be placed in supermarkets and malls to make it easier for people to vote, Justice Minister Andrew Little has announced. More>>

ALSO:

"Population Density": Stats NZ, Phone Companies To Track People's Movements

Stats NZ is partnering with cellphone companies to launch a new way of tracking people's movements every hour. More>>

ALSO:

QS University Rankings: NZ Ranks Well "Despite Resourcing Constraints"

New Zealand universities continue to do well in international rankings, with the release of the 2020 QS world rankings showing that all eight universities remain in the world’s top 500. More>>

ALSO:

Mosque Attacks: 21 Month Prison Sentence For Sharing Live Stream Video

A Christchurch man who admitted redistributing the livestream video of the mosque killings has been sentenced to 21 months in prison. More>>

ALSO:

Operation Burnham Inquiry: Afghan Villagers Pull Out

The Afghan villagers involved with the inquiry into Operation Burnham say they have lost faith in the process and will no longer take part. More>>

ALSO:

Child 'Uplifts': Children’s Commissioner To Conduct Review

“At the time of the attempted uplift from Hawke’s Bay Maternity Hospital at the beginning of May, our Office shared our views on the critical importance of the mother-child relationship, and the fact that this relationship is denied to too many Māori children”, says the Children’s Commissioner, Judge Andrew Becroft. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels