Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


"Legitimate purpose" provides no protection under 167 form

17 April 2014

"Relevance" and "legitimate purpose" provides no protection under 167 form

On Radio New Zealand today, the Privacy Commissioner indicated that ACC could only request information that was "relevant" for a "legitimate purpose". His view was therefore that the ACC167 form is not a "blank cheque" or "carte blanche".

While the form does suggest that information must be relevant, the duration of the information consent and the way the form is used mean that these requirements provide no protection for claimants.

ACC claimants who are required to sign a 167 form give their consent once and it applies for the life of their claim. ACC refuses to negotiate a limited time frame, despite what is recorded on the form. ACC is able to decline to provide entitlements, including weekly compensation, if a claimant insists on a limited time frame. The only way to challenge the reasonableness of ACC's position on your consent is by legal challenge, which is difficult when ACC is withholding your primary source of income.

Once the form is signed, ACC obtains administrative freedom, and is largely left to its own devices.

Significantly, the form does not require ACC to notify a claimant what information is being collected or disclosed. There is therefore no opportunity for a claimant to monitor the relevance requirement, or object as to whether the information is relevant before it is collected or disclosed.

Considering the scale of ACC's disclosure of this information, for example to potential employers, it is not entirely clear they can effectively monitor the relevance of that information before disclosing it. Certainly, a claimant is not given that chance.

The form enables information to be collected, used, and disclosed regardless of relevance, and without notification to the claimant. The requirement for blanket consent (rather than on a case-by-case basis as Judge Powell specifically endorsed) means that irrelevant information can be collected, used, and disclosed for an illegitimate purpose before a claimant is even aware what has taken place.

Claimants also routinely suffer abuse even for a "legitimate purpose". The ACC167 form enables fraud investigators to contact any number of third parties for the "legitimate purpose" of investigating and disclosing information in relation to alleged fraud. Situations exist where claimants have been forced to leave small communities because the inquiries of a fraud investigator have irreparably harmed their reputation. The number and scale of these investigations undertaken each year is unclear.

When it comes to the ACC167 form, with its lengthy time-frame and broad consent, the Privacy Commissioner is unfortunately incorrect in saying that "relevance" and "legitimate purpose" provide any protection for claimants.

ACC167 gives ACC a blank cheque to do as they wish with claimants' information, including providing it to 36,000 potential employers in the past year alone. It is unclear whether ACC was paid for this service.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell:
On The Last Rites For The TPP

The Trans Pacific Partnership trade deal is one of those litmus issues that has always had more to do with one’s place on the political spectrum than with any imminent reality.

To date, the Greens have opposed (a) a wide range of the leaked content of the TPP (b) the secretive way it has been negotiated and (c) the undemocratic way in which any final document would be ratified. Labour has shared some of those concerns, but while remaining generally supportive of the deal itself.

National has, for its part, been very enthusiastic about the TPP, while still giving assurances about Pharmac being protected... For the TPP’s friends and foes alike though, the end now seems nigh. More>>

 
 

Gordon Campbell: On The Farcical Elevation Of David Seymour

With the election won, it’s time to find jobs for the boy. David Seymour is the Act Party’s latest scrounger to be rewarded by the National Party, and not only with a seat in Parliament. More>>

ALSO:

As Key Mulls Joining ISIS Fighting: McCully Speech To UN Backs Security Council Bid

It is an honour to address you today on behalf of the Prime Minister and Government of New Zealand. Our General Election took place last week - our Prime Minister Rt Hon John Key is engaged in forming a government and that is why he is unable to be here in New York... More>>

ALSO:

Labour: Cunliffe Triggers Party Wide Leadership Contest

David Cunliffe has resigned as Labour Leader, but says he will seek re-election... If there is any contest the election will have to go through a process involving the party membership and union affiliates. More>>

ALSO:

Flyover Appeal: Progress And Certainty, Or Confusion And More Delays?

Lindsay Shelton: The Transport Agency, embarrassed by the rejection of its flyover alongside the Basin Reserve, says it’s appealing because the decision could “constrain progress.” Yet for most clear-sighted Wellingtonians a 300-metre-long concrete structure above Kent and Cambridge Terraces would in no way be seen as progress… More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Cunliffe’s Last Stand

Right now, embattled Labour leader David Cunliffe has three options. None of them are particularly attractive for him personally, or for the Labour Party... More>>

ALSO:

Key Seeking 'New Ideas': Look To Children’s Commissioner On Poverty - Greens

John Key should not reinvent the wheel when it comes to ideas for tackling child poverty, and instead look to the recommendations of the Children’s Commissioner’s Expert Group on Child Poverty, Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei says. More>>

ALSO:

'Safe To Re-Enter' - OIA Docs: Safety Is Absolute Priority At Pike River Mine

“We understand that the time it is taking to complete our evaluation of the risks is frustrating for the family members and we are trying to complete this work as quickly as we can,” Ms Dunphy says. “It is Solid Energy’s responsibility to make this decision and we will do so, once we have all the information required to make a fully-informed decision.” More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
More RSS  RSS
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news