Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


"Legitimate purpose" provides no protection under 167 form

17 April 2014

"Relevance" and "legitimate purpose" provides no protection under 167 form

On Radio New Zealand today, the Privacy Commissioner indicated that ACC could only request information that was "relevant" for a "legitimate purpose". His view was therefore that the ACC167 form is not a "blank cheque" or "carte blanche".

While the form does suggest that information must be relevant, the duration of the information consent and the way the form is used mean that these requirements provide no protection for claimants.

ACC claimants who are required to sign a 167 form give their consent once and it applies for the life of their claim. ACC refuses to negotiate a limited time frame, despite what is recorded on the form. ACC is able to decline to provide entitlements, including weekly compensation, if a claimant insists on a limited time frame. The only way to challenge the reasonableness of ACC's position on your consent is by legal challenge, which is difficult when ACC is withholding your primary source of income.

Once the form is signed, ACC obtains administrative freedom, and is largely left to its own devices.

Significantly, the form does not require ACC to notify a claimant what information is being collected or disclosed. There is therefore no opportunity for a claimant to monitor the relevance requirement, or object as to whether the information is relevant before it is collected or disclosed.

Considering the scale of ACC's disclosure of this information, for example to potential employers, it is not entirely clear they can effectively monitor the relevance of that information before disclosing it. Certainly, a claimant is not given that chance.

The form enables information to be collected, used, and disclosed regardless of relevance, and without notification to the claimant. The requirement for blanket consent (rather than on a case-by-case basis as Judge Powell specifically endorsed) means that irrelevant information can be collected, used, and disclosed for an illegitimate purpose before a claimant is even aware what has taken place.

Claimants also routinely suffer abuse even for a "legitimate purpose". The ACC167 form enables fraud investigators to contact any number of third parties for the "legitimate purpose" of investigating and disclosing information in relation to alleged fraud. Situations exist where claimants have been forced to leave small communities because the inquiries of a fraud investigator have irreparably harmed their reputation. The number and scale of these investigations undertaken each year is unclear.

When it comes to the ACC167 form, with its lengthy time-frame and broad consent, the Privacy Commissioner is unfortunately incorrect in saying that "relevance" and "legitimate purpose" provide any protection for claimants.

ACC167 gives ACC a blank cheque to do as they wish with claimants' information, including providing it to 36,000 potential employers in the past year alone. It is unclear whether ACC was paid for this service.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell:
On The Kim Regime

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US had a very clear objective and eventually offered a quid pro quo of the removal of some of its own missiles from Turkey. This time, there’s no clarity about what the US is seeking, or offering.

It hasn’t helped that the US and the global media consistently agree on calling North Korea and its leadership “crazy” and “irrational” and urging it to “come to its senses”. When you treat your opponent as being beyond reason, it gets hard to comprehend what their strategy is, let alone work out the terms of a viable compromise. More>>

 

Recovery: Economic Impact Of Kaikōura Quake Revealed

The report details the impact on small businesses and tourism caused by disruptions to transport infrastructure and the economic impacts... The impact on New Zealand’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the first 18 months following the earthquake has been estimated at $450-$500 million. More>>

ALSO:

Human Rights Commission: Urgent Need For Action On Seclusion And Restraint

Chief Human Rights Commissioner David Rutherford says that while the report makes for sobering reading, the focus should now be on how the recommendations can be used to reduce the occurrence of seclusion and restraint in New Zealand and, in circumstances where it is necessary, to improve practices. More>>

ALSO:

CORRECTIONS (March 2017):

SCHOOL SECLUSION ROOMS (2016):

$11bn Capital Spend, New Debt Target: Steven Joyce On Budget Priorities

First, delivering better public services for a growing country – providing all New Zealanders with the opportunity to lead successful independent lives... And finally, we remain committed to reducing the tax burden and in particular the impact of marginal tax rates on lower and middle income earners, when we have the room to do so. More>>

ALSO:

JustSpeak Report: Bail Changes To Blame For New Billion Dollar Prison

In 2013 criminal justice spending was falling and the Government was mulling over what to spend the money on. 3 years later there are 10,000 people in prison and a new billion dollar prison is announced. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news