Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


On The Nation: Education Issues

On The Nation: Education debate with Hekia Parata & Chris Hipkins / Patrick Gower releases education poll

Patrick Gower hosts an education debate with National’s Hekia Parata and Labour’s Chris Hipkins and reveals the results of a special 3News-Reid Research poll on education policy.


3News-Reid Research poll finds Labour’s policy to reduce class sizes more popular than National’s policy to pay good teachers more.

Poll shows 52% support Labour’s policy versus 40% in favour of National’s (8% don’t know)

Of National voters, nearly a quarter (24%) preferred Labour’s policy (69% of National voters favoured National’s policy, 7% didn’t know).

The Nation on TV3, 9.30am Saturdays and 10am Sundays.

Check us out online, on Facebook or on Twitter. Tell us what you think at thenation@mediaworks.co.nz or text 3330.

The Nation is proudly brought to you by New Zealand on Air’s Platinum Fund.


Patrick Gower: Thanks, Lisa. And Hekia Parata and Chris Hipkins, thank you very much for joining us. Well, we saw the results there. Chris Hipkins, Labour's policy is more popular, so we'll start with you, Hekia Parata. What is actually wrong with having fewer kids in the classroom? Is there anything actually wrong with having fewer kids in the classroom?

Hekia Parata: Oh, not at all, but nevertheless, you still need really good teaching practice, however many you have. Very few of us remember how many kids were in our class, but we remember whether we had a good teacher or not. And the next thing to know is that it's not one or the other. In the past five years, teacher numbers have increased by 15%, while student numbers have increased by less than 1%. So it's both about having the right number of teachers, and it's about ensuring that there's good quality teaching practice across the education system.

Chris Hipkins, you heard the minister there. I mean, she's saying there is fewer kids in the classroom. What's your policy all about, then?

Chris Hipkins: Well, no, there aren't fewer kids in the classroom. I think—

Well, the minister—

Hipkins: But I do agree with one point that Hekia just made, which is it's not either or. Actually, smaller class sizes does lead to better quality teaching. Every parent knows that the more one-on-one time their child has with the teacher, the better the quality of the learning experience is going to be. So smaller class sizes contribute to a number of things that are really effective. So class sizes themselves shouldn't be isolated out as being a silver bullet, but they contribute to a number of other things that will help to improve student achievement.

But that's the problem here. Because voters have a choice, it is one or the other.

Parata: No, but that's the point I'm making. It isn't one or the other. We've already increased the number of teachers that are in our education system.

It's $400 million each way. You don't get both.

Parata: My point is that in the last five years, the number of teachers have increased in our system. We've also, in this policy, focused on how we raise the teaching practice across the system. In addition, of course, we've linked up all our schools are in the process of doing that, connecting them to digital technology. We're creating more modern learning environments where innovative teaching is what we're focusing on as much as the more traditional aspects.

OK, Minister, can you guarantee, then, class sizes the same as what Labour is promising? Can you guarantee that smaller class sizes?

Parata: What we're focused on is how does every child get a better education, and the evidence is really clear that they are getting a better education.

Yes or no — can you guarantee class sizes—?

Parata: Well, no, because that question—

OK, you can't, so, Chris Hipkins, what—?

Parata: But you're making that a question as if that itself correlates to good education.

Chris Hipkins, I'll bring you in here, then. What is so wrong with improving the quality of teachers and paying good teachers more?

Hipkins: Oh, it's vitally important that we improve the quality of teaching, and we're focused on ways that we can actually do that. We've gone out—

Yeah, but what about paying the good teachers more as well? What is wrong with that? What is wrong with this policy?

Hipkins: Paying a principal, for example, an extra $40,000 a year to spend two days out of their own school, trying to supervise the work of up to 10 other schools, isn't going to improve the quality of teaching.

But that's not all of the policy, because what we do know is that some of the teachers stay in the classroom. I mean, even the PPTA like National's policy, don't they? Do you agree with that? They think it's a good policy?

Hipkins: There are aspects of the policy that are supported, including things like extra inquiry time, extra release time. Schools will be able to provide that with the extra teaching hours that we're going to be providing them, if that's the way they choose to allocate those. We're actually putting a lot of the responsibility back into the hands of schools, rather than government coming in and saying, 'We're gonna impose a new managerialist structure over top of them.'

Parata: We're not imposing. We've made it very clear that this is an opt-in policy, and it does work on all the really well-evidenced and common sense feedback we get — that is that teachers learn best from other teachers; that New Zealand has a history of really good pockets of excellence but very great difficulty in getting those spread across the system. This is the opportunity to do that. We already have a lot of release time — 4.5 million hours' worth per year where teachers are often out of the classroom, developing their teaching practice. What this initiative does is make that systematic and less ad hoc.

Yeah, so, Chris Hipkins, what is wrong with that? Because you know the arguments. All the evidence shows that it is about improving teacher quality. You've even just admitted that before. Your policy is just based on poll results, isn't it? People like it.

Hipkins: Not at all. Actually, there are better ways to improve teacher quality. So we've looked at the evidence and the research as well, and one of the things we can do, for example, is re-establish a good school advisory service, cos teachers actually know the areas where they're not doing well. Most classroom teachers — if you sit down with them and say, 'What are the things that you want to improve your skills on?' — they'll be able to tell you that. But there's no proactive support available for them, because this government actually cut the funding for school advisory services and just about everything other than literacy and numeracy. And actually, science and the arts—

Let's pick up on school funding. Let's pick up on school funding, cos that—

Parata: That's not true.

...cos we wanna talk about that. Do we have a free education system? And, Chris Hipkins, you go first.

Hipkins: We should have a free education system.

Do we have one?

Hipkins: We don't at the moment.

Hekia Parata, do we have a free education system?

Parata: The government funds 100% of the New Zealand curriculum. At $10.1 billion, that's the highest ever that's been invested in education.

OK, so why are parents paying up to $300 in donations or fees to their schools?

Parata: It has always been the case that—

$350 million in total, it's estimated, actually paid in fees and donations on the supposedly free education system.

Parata: Based on schools' own reporting in the 2013 year, 1.8% were donations that went into our entire education system.

$350 million. 1.8% is quite a lot of the whole entire education system.

Parata: Well, no, it's less than that I can't remember the figure, and I don't want to be inaccurate, but it is less than that. The point is that the government funds 100% of the curriculum. If parents in a community want additional things, that's something they negotiate with their school, and if that is the case, then that's what donations mean. But they aren't required to pay for those. I think it is unreasonable to expect that for choices over and above 100% of the curriculum should somehow be paid by all taxpayers. Those are school community by school community choices.

Chris Hipkins, donations only cover the basics.

Hipkins: Look, I think the stark reality is that school funding hasn't actually kept up with the cost of delivering the curriculum, and that is why schools are reliant more on donations than they have been in the past. Bill English actually decried this issue when he was in opposition and he was the opposition spokesperson for education, basically saying that government funding wasn't keeping up, and it was all down to Mum and Dad now to prop up schools. That problem's got worse since—

So what are you gonna do about it?

Parata: No, that problem hasn't got worse. No, hang on a minute. No.

Hipkins: It has got worse. Parents are paying more in donations now than they were when National became the government.

Parata: We have put $600 million net new dollars into operational grants over the last six budgets. They have either been in line with inflation or ahead of it. So, actually, we have corrected that particular issue.

Hipkins: So why are parents paying more in donations if that's the case?

Parata: Because parents are highly aspirational people, and they want more for their children, and my point is not to stop that happening, but for that to be a discussion between their school board and school about what are those additional things that they want to happen.

Hipkins: But that is putting enormous pressure on parents, and if you go to low decile schools, they might be asking parents for, say, a $30 a year donation and then collecting in about 30% of that. If you go to a wealthier school, they might be asking for a $300 a year donation, and they'll be collecting in the vast bulk of it. That's hugely unfair to say that parents should be relied upon to fund the cost of education. We have a free education system; the government should fund a free education system.

Parata: The government, at $10.1 billion— that is a 45% increase on what it was in 2008. And all of the operational grants, which is the discretionary amount that schools have to spend, have been in line with or slightly ahead of inflation. Those are the facts.

I want a quickfire question here — personal view. I'll start with you, Minister. The school year — should it start later so that kids and families can enjoy some more of summer? Yes or no — personal view.

Parata: Well, the start date, factually, of a school is up to a school, and it's across a period.

Chris Hipkins, I'll move on to you. Do you have a personal view on whether the school year should start later?

Hipkins: I'd leave that up to schools, quite frankly.

Parata: It is left up to schools.

Both of you don't have a view on something that parents and teachers—

Parata: Well, no, no, because—

We'll move on, we'll move on. You had a chance. Charter schools. Charter schools. Vanguard School are one of the new charter schools. Its roll's dropped from 104 to 93 students already, just after two terms. What's going on in there, Hekia Parata? What's going wrong?

Parata: First of all, any school, whatever kind, in its first year, does have a variable—

What's going wrong at Vanguard School?

Parata: ...does have a variable roll. I don't think anything's going wrong at Vanguard School. I visited the school, I've met with the students, I've met with the staff, and what I hear from the students there is that they are very happy, that they are learning in ways that meet their needs. A number of the kids there have been excluded or stood down from a range of other schools. Those kids go there because they choose to go there. No one is compelled to go to that school or any other of the partnership schools.

But, Chris, you're going to shut them down? You're gonna shut down charter schools?

Hipkins: Look, we don't need the model of charter schools. They don't have employ regi—

So you'll shut them down?

Hipkins: Yes, absolutely.

So where do these kids go? Where do these kids go? Because we know at Vanguard school, they've got discipline issues, and they go there because it has military-style discipline. Where do they go under Labour?

Hipkins: We've said we will look at that on a case-by-case basis. Some of the people—

Where would the—? But where would the kids go?

Hipkins: Well, I'm about to tell you. Just hold your breath for a second. Some of the people wanting to establish charter schools are actually trying to fill a genuine gap in the education system, and we'll work with them to ensure they can do that within the existing state school framework, because there are options for them within the existing state school framework. But the charter school legislation allows school to make a profit, be set up as profit—

Parata: That's untrue.

So some charter schools could become state schools?

Hipkins: It's quite possible that they could be integrated into the system or they could work within the existing state school framework.

OK, speaking of integration, here's another quickfire question. Try and do better this time, please. Yes or no — Destiny Church wants its funding to be integrated and wants taxpayer funding. Should it get it? Chris Hipkins, yes or no?

Hipkins: Any minister of education would have to consider an integration proposal based on—

Hekia Parata, yes or no? Should Destiny—?

Parata: By law, we have to consider any proposal made.

OK, so you failed to answer that quickfire as well.

Parata: I'm answering you factually.

Hipkins: It would actually land up the government in court if either of us made a decision on that application before it's even been seen, and then the taxpayer would end up paying for that through a judicial review. It would be irresponsible to do that.

National standards. Hekia Parata. Reading, writing, counting, all important, but this is the 21st century. Where's the science? Why isn't science up there as a priority?

Parata: National Standards are a way of reporting how the system as a whole is doing. When you go to the GP and you have your pulse taken and your blood pressure taken, neither you nor she thinks that's gonna fix your sore ear or your heart or your foot. It's a way of getting a handle on the underlying system.

But it's not whole; it's three things.

Parata: That's what national standards does. It's a way of understanding whether the system as a whole is working, and, actually, successful teaching is a rich, cross-curriculum, co-curriculum programme.

With three things in it. Chris Hipkins, you'd scrap national standards. What would you replace it with?

Hipkins: Kids are over-assessed in our schools. There are fantastic examples of how schools can report information to parents already, without national standards. National standards aren't national nor are they standard. They're being implemented variably across the country. They're no good measure of student progress at all.

Parata: They're getting better, and I think it's really disrespectful to teachers across the country who have been working really hard with the curriculum, ensuring that the assessment tools they use— and, by the way, there's no national standard test. It's a high-trust model. It relies on teachers' own judgement as to how well their kids are doing. That's the information we rely on. It's the highest-trust model in the world.

Here's a quickfire question. Te reo Maori in school. Te reo Maori in schools. Yes or no — Chris Hipkins.

Hipkins: Not compulsory, but certainly, I support it being more widely available.

Parata: Not compulsory, no.

OK, computers in schools. Chris Hipkins, how long would one of those students have, under Labour's policy, a free laptop?

Hipkins: From year five onwards, they would have access. It would be free, because we'd be asking parents to make a contribution.

Yeah, but how many years do they keep it for?

Hipkins: Well, they could replace it after a couple of years. I mean, the model is based on—

You pay for the replacement or is that free too?

Hipkins: None of it's free. If you look at the Manaiakalani model, which is what we've based our policy on, the kids get the device, their parents make a small payment on a weekly basis to help pay off the cost of it.

Parata: They pay a third.

Hipkins: After a period of time, it's paid off, and then if the school and the parents want to upgrade to get a new device, then that's an option as well.

Last quickfire question. What was your favourite subject at school, Hekia Parata?

Parata: English.

Chris Hipkins?

Hipkins: Yeah, I'd probably say History, actually.

OK, you actually did one. Thank you very much for your time, guys.

Transcript provided by Able.



© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

More Rent Assistance, Less State-Owned Housing:
John Key Speech - Next Steps In Social Housing

"We are going to ensure that more people get into social housing over the next three years, whether that is run by Housing New Zealand or a community provider.

The social housing budget provides for around 62,000 income-related rent subsidies a year. We are committed to increasing that to around 65,000 subsidies by 2017/18, which will cost an extra $40 million a year." More>>


The Future Of Work: Andrew Little - State Of The Nation 2015

In 2005 when I led the EPMU we worked together with Air New Zealand to find a way to keep engineering jobs that were heading overseas. A lot of these workers were people I’d known for years and they were facing not just losing their jobs but not being able to find the kind of work they do without going overseas. A lot of people were facing personal and financial upheaval.

It was hard work but in the end we kept more than 300 skilled and well-paid jobs in New Zealand. And we managed to benefit Air New Zealand and its workforce with productivity gains too... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Sabin Case, The Pressures On Greece And (Songs About) Coyotes

Mike Sabin is a National MP, and the current chairman of Parliament’s law and order committee. Yet reportedly, he is being investigated by the Police over an assault complaint... However, the PM will not comment on any aspect of the story. More>>


Houses, ISIS, King (& Catton): PM Post-Cabinet Press Conference

The Prime Minister met with reporters to discuss: • Social housing, the Auckland housing market • The prospect of joining international forces to combat ISIS • David Bain’s compensation • The lowering of the flag for the King of Saudi Arabia's death ... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Tomorrow’s Speeches By John Key And Andrew Little

The Key government has already kicked off the political year on a stridently ideological note, with Environment Minister Nick Smith choosing to lay all manner of sins at the door of the RMA. Tomorrow, the government will wheeling out its best salesman – Prime Minister John Key – to sell its plans for state housing… . More>>


Transport: Auckland Looks To Light Rail

The Board of Auckland Transport has called for an investigation into a light rail network, which could relieve traffic congestion on some of the region’s busiest roads. This stems from work in 2012 (the City Centre Future Access study) which responded to a government request to develop a robust and achievable solution for access to the CBD. More>>


RMA: Smith's Claims Don't Match Evidence - Greens

The Motu group’s research into the impacts of planning rules looked at the costs related to housing development but not the benefits of environmental protections and does not recommend significant changes to the RMA to reduce the cost of new house builds. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Similarities Between John Key And David Cameron

For years now, David Cameron has been the closest available thing to a mentor/analogue to our Prime Minister, such that Key watchers could be interested in an analysis of Cameron that appeared in the British press over the Christmas break. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On Ian Fletcher Resignation & GCSB’s New Role

It may well be that after being shoulder-tapped in Queensland for the GCSB job, three years of living in Wellington has been enough for Fletcher and his family, given that the pending review of the GCSB would have required an even longer commitment from him. Three years of Wellington’s weather is enough for anyone... More>>


Get More From Scoop



More RSS  RSS News AlertsNews Alerts
Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news