Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Judgment in Paki v Attorney General

Tamaiti Cairns said that today’s Supreme Court decision is complicated, but, in essence opens the door for Maori people to go forward with their essential claims to water. Further work is required and Pouakani Trust will continue to pursue its claims through Stage 2 of the Waitangi Tribunal Inquiry into water issues.

Our lawyers have provided the following summary of today’s Supreme Court decision:

“ The hapu of Ngati Wairangi, Ngati Moe, Ngati Korotuohu, Ngati Ha, Ngati Hinekahu and Ngati Rakau brought a claim on appeal to the Supreme Court over ownership of part of the Waikato River

A previous decision of the New Zealand Court in 1962 had held that an English common law rule applied here called “usque ad medium filum aquae”. This meant that when land bordered by a river is sold the purchaser acquires the bed of the river up to the midpoint.

The hapū argued that Maori vendors had no understanding of this rule. Therefore, the Crown as purchasers may have acquired the ownership of the bed of the river, but in doing so had fiduciary duties to hold the river for the benefit of Maori.

The Supreme Court have unanimously rejected that argument. However, in doing so the Court has also unanimously found that the common law rule is not the universal law of New Zealand. Whether it applies will depend on the custom and usage of the native vendors.

Therefore, while the Court has refused the appeal calling for the Crown to be found to be fiduciary owners, the Court has gone on to find that it is not clear that the Crown are owners of the River at all. The ownership of the river remains to be determined before the Courts.

While this is not the path that the Pouakani hapū were following, it is a major victory for Maori all over New Zealand. It gives all Maori the opportunity to reclaim the rivers that they never willingly sold. ”

Tamati Cairns said the Supreme Court have set another milestone in the recognition of Maori. It is a reminder that the law must respect the reality of Maori culture rather than assuming, without reason, that laws developed in England automatically apply in New Zealand


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 

Sugar: Auckland Leisure Centres Axe Unhealthy Drinks

Auckland Council is to stop selling drinks that are sweetened by sugar from vending machines at its leisure centres in a bid to try to reduce obesity and type 2 diabetes... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Todd McClay’s Faulty Memory

Time and again, whenever an issue arises the initial response by government is to deny or diminish the problem – nothing to worry about here, everything’s OK, move on. Then, hang on. In line with the usual pattern, as embarrassing details emerged into daylight, the story changed. More>>

ALSO:

Labour's 'Future Of Work': Major Reform Of Careers And Apprenticeships

The next Labour Government will transform careers advice in high schools to ensure every student has a personalised career plan, Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little says. More>>

ALSO:

State Investments Management: Treasury Likes IRD, Not Education Or Corrections

The Inland Revenue Department has scored an 'A' in the first tranche of the Treasury's investor confidence rating for state agencies that manage significant Crown investments and assets, gaining greater autonomy as a result, while the Corrections and Education ministries gained a 'C' rating. More>>

ALSO:

Govt Goal: NZ To Be "Predator Free" By 2050

Prime Minister John Key has today announced the Government has adopted the goal of New Zealand becoming Predator Free by 2050... “That’s why we have adopted this goal. Our ambition is that by 2050 every single part of New Zealand will be completely free of rats, stoats and possums." More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The IOC’s Treatment Of Russian Sport, And Lone Wolf Terrorism

A blanket ban on Russian athletes would also have exposed the IOC to criticism that its treatment of Russia would have been marked contrast to its treatment say, of the track and field team from Kenya – a country about which the IOC has very similar doping concerns. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news