Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Electoral Commission Response to High Court Decision
Electoral Commission Response to High Court Decision 8 September 2014
The High Court in Wellington has today
released a judgment in two cases filed concerning decisions
of the Electoral Commission (Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc &
Ors v Electoral Commission CIV-2014-485-8997) and
(Greenpeace of New Zealand Inc v Electoral Commission
CIV-2014-485-8998).
In the first case, Greenpeace and others were seeking a statutory declaration that the Climate Voter website was not an election advertisement under section 3A of the Electoral Act 1993. The Court rejected Greenpeace’s arguments and said that the website that the Electoral Commission considered when providing its advisory opinion was an election advertisement for the purposes of the Electoral Act.
In the second case, regarding a Greenpeace website criticising Simon Bridges, the Court has declared that the website was not an election advertisement as it related to his role as Minister of Energy and could not reasonably be regarded as encouraging or persuading people not to vote for a candidate or party.
The Electoral Commission will need to carefully consider the judgment and discuss the implications of the decision further with Greenpeace and others.
No further comment will be made while the judgment is under consideration.
ends
Gordon Campbell: On The Public Sector Carnage, And Misogyny As Terrorism
National Maori Authority: Maori Authority Warns Government On Fast Track Legislation
NZ Government: Comprehensive Partnership The Goal For NZ And The Philippines
DoC: Canterbury Spotted Skink In Serious Trouble
Te Pāti Māori: Oranga Tamariki Cuts Commit Tamariki To State Abuse
NZCTU: Inflation Data Shows Need For A Plan On Climate And Population
Statistics New Zealand: Annual Inflation At 4.0 Percent
