Christchurch Sex Offender Protected by Name Suppression
Christchurch Sex Offender Protected by Name Suppression Madness
The
Judge was somewhat sympathetic but said he was constrained
in his decision by the Criminal Procedures Act 2011 (CPA
2011).
In a recent
decision by Christchurch District Court Judge Brian
Callaghan, a sexual offender was given name suppression even
though the victims asked that their abuser be named.
“The CPA 2011 continues to victimise victims and this was surely not parliament’s intention?” questions Ruth Money, Sensible Sentencing CEO. “This case is yet another example of the urgent need for NZ’s name suppression laws to be revised to ensure victims wishes can be acted upon by the courts”, she continues.
The parents of the
victims (two girls and a boy, now aged 14, 13, and 11,) had
discussed the question of name suppression with their
children. These victims wanted the offender named
publically – “after all the shame should be the
offenders not the victims”states
Money.
“While we accept that the Judge is bound
by the CPA, we believe he should have made the offender’s
name suppression expressly conditional upon the need to
protect the victims’ name suppression. Then, when the
victims turn 18 and wish to apply to have their own
suppression lifted, his would automatically lapse saving
further revictimisation and court battles for the innocent
victims” says Money.
“Parliament needs to
move quickly to avoid these ridiculous issues that the CPA
is causing with respect to name suppression in NZ. This
case is another example of sex offenders being enabled via
legislation and it must stop” pleads
Money.
Original Fairfax media article here:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10695390/Young-victims-wanted-sex-abuser-to-be-named
ENDS