Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Ashley Dwayne Guy v The Queen: Appeal Upheld

19 November 2014

MEDIA RELEASE – FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLICATION

ASHLEY DWAYNE GUY v THE QUEEN

(SC 67/2012)

[2014] NZSC 165

PRESS SUMMARY

This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment and reasons can be found at www.courtsofnz.govt.nz.

The appellant, Mr Guy, was found guilty by a jury of a charge of sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection. After the verdict it was discovered that, by error, the jury had been provided in the jury room with two documents that had not been introduced in evidence at trial.

The first document was a transcript of an interview conducted by the police with the appellant and recorded by video. The appellant’s counsel had before trial, objected to the admission of the video interview and the transcript. Because of this objection, Crown counsel did not seek to produce the video interview or the transcript but instead, without objection, led evidence from the interviewing officer that the appellant had been spoken to but had said he was not in a position to “make an honest clear statement” because he did not remember what had happened.

The second document was the transcript of a statement made to the police by the complainant. Crown counsel had not attempted to put the statement in argue at trial and no reason was given at trial to justify the admission of such a previous consistent statement under s 35 of the Evidence Act 2006.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Mr Guy appealed to the Court of Appeal against his conviction on the basis that the provision of these two documents to the jury resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Section 385(1)(c) of the Crimes Act 1961 (which was at the time the relevant provision) provided that an appeal to the Court of Appeal or Supreme Court against conviction must be allowed if there has been a miscarriage of justice, subject to the proviso that the court may dismiss an appeal if “no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred”.

The Court of Appeal dismissed Mr Guy’s appeal. While the Court of Appeal accepted that the provision of the transcripts to the jury raised a “powerful argument” that the trial had miscarried, it held that, in the circumstances of the trial as a whole, there was no miscarriage of justice. Mr Guy appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court, by majority comprising Elias CJ, Glazebrook and O’Regan JJ, has allowed the appeal.

Elias CJ and Glazebrook J held that, because significant material bearing on the critical issues in the case was provided to the jury without having been put in evidence, there was a breach of natural justice leading to an unfair trial. The right to a fair trial is fundamental and this in itself meant that there was a miscarriage of justice, that the proviso to s 385(1) is inapplicable and therefore that the conviction must be set aside. In any event, they held that the material provided to the jury could have affected the result of the trial.

O’Regan J has given separate concurring reasons. O’Regan J considered that it was necessary to assess whether the provision of the material to the jury was capable of affecting the result of the trial so as to constitute a miscarriage of justice. O’Regan J has decided that the provision of the transcripts was capable of affecting the verdict and that, due to the focus on credibility and reliability, this was not an appropriate case to apply the proviso to s 385(1).

McGrath and William Young JJ dissented. They considered that the provision of the transcripts could not have affected the result at trial.

In accordance with the views of the majority, the appellant’s conviction is quashed and a new trial is ordered.

[Full judgment: SC_67_2012__Ashley_Dwayne_GUY_v_The_Queen_Criminal_Judgment.pdf]

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines



Gordon Campbell: On Dune 2, And Images Of Islam


Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture tends to be hostile to Islam when we’re sitting in the dark, with popcorn.
Any number of movie examples come to mind, beginning with Rudolf Valentino’s role (over a century ago) as the romantic Arab hero in The Sheik...
More


 
 


Government: One-stop Shop Major Projects On The Fast Track

The Coalition Government’s new one-stop-shop fast track consenting regime for regional and national projects of significance will cut red tape and make it easier for New Zealand to build the infrastructure and major projects needed to get the country moving again... More

ALSO:


Government: GPS 2024: Over $20 Billion To Get Transport Back On Track
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has released the draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport, outlining the Coalition Government’s plan to build and maintain a transport system that enables people to get to where they need to go quickly and safely... More

ALSO:

Government: Humanitarian Support For Gaza & West Bank

Winston Peters has announced NZ is providing a further $5M to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank. “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling," he said... More


Government: New High Court Judge Appointed

Judith Collins has announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English Literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996... More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.