“Free Press” Act’s New Bulletin
“Free Press” Act’s New Bulletin
Prime Minister on NZ
Superannuation
In the House last week the PM
suggested we didn’t need to worry about NZ Super because
it is only costing us less than 5% of GDP, compared with
over 9% for the OECD average now. He added that on current
trends in NZ it would only rise to 8% of GDP by
2060.
Sound Reasonable?
Well, that
depends on whether all is well in the OECD countries that
are at or above these levels. France, Greece, Italy,
Portugal, Spain, for example, are all well above the OECD
average already. In a word association game, the words
“fiscal and debt crisis” would fit pretty well with this
list of countries. And also “grinding recession”. The PM
is setting the bar way too low.
From Where do
Pensions get Paid?
Not from GDP. For largely
pay-as-you-go systems, pension costs are a large component
of government spending. For that list of countries, pension
payments range from 23-32% of government spending (OECD data
from 2011). That sort of spending on pensions contributes to
the surge in debt levels, squeezes out a lot of other worthy
spending, and kills any chance of lower taxes. Do we really
want to go there?
How are those Countries
Responding?
It’s been a mad scramble of panic
and desperation, in the context of grinding recession and,
in some cases, depression level collapses in output. The
ages of eligibility are going up; where there are pension
contributions those are being increased; and indexation is
shifting from a wage to inflation basis. It’s not wise to
kick the can down the road.
The Outlook in
NZ
In 2012 NZ Super was about 10.3% of
government spending, and this year 12%. Treasury’s long
term fiscal projections referred to by the PM show that
increasing to 15% by 2030. And this is assuming the economy
can deliver 1.6%pa real wage growth. As discovered in
Europe, if something goes wrong debt levels will spiral out
of control.
Or in Dollar Terms
NZ
Super costs in 2014 were $11 billion. How much extra would
that have been if not for earlier far-sighted political
decisions to lift the age of eligibility from 60 to 65? The
answer is another $4 billion a year. So what programmes
would we have had to cut to fund that, or what taxes
increased? Would those who opposed the last increase in the
age of eligibility, from 60 to 65, now argue the case for
putting it back to 60?
Well?
We
didn’t think so.
Extra Costs Coming Down the
Line
NZ Super costs will be increasing by about
$700 million every year through the rest of this decade, and
by about $1.5 billion by the second half of the 2020s. By
2030 we will be spending around $30 billion a year on NZ
Super. So which bunch of taxpayers are going to be funding
this extra spending every year, or which spending programmes
will be cut, or which taxes increased? No wonder it is hard
to balance the budget – that’s quite a
headwind.
NZ Super Sustainability can Easily be
Achieved
It’s true that NZ is in a far better
position than many OECD countries. But many of them are a
mess. If we make gradual changes now we can keep what is a
simple and effective pension scheme, while making it fairer
across generations. Time to get
started.
Intergenerational
Warfare
This resistance to making continual
incremental changes to NZ Super is setting up an
intergenerational battle. Younger generations, with student
debt, unaffordable housing, and the threat of rising taxes
to pay for all this, have every reason to feel
aggrieved.
And We Live Longer
Life
expectancy is rising by a year every decade. It should be a
no brainer – we all know intuitively that it makes sense
to align the age of eligibility with life
expectancy.
But That’s not All
The
demographic shock is not just due to rising life expectancy,
it is also due to reduced fertility. There are fewer younger
people. We are moving from a period in the 1970s where there
were seven working age people for every one superannuant, to
a situation in 2060 with only two working age people for
every one superannuant.
Behavioural Changes Matter
Too
Some interesting US data shows behavioural
changes adding half a year to life expectancy since 1960:
+1.3 years due to less smoking, +0.4 years due to lower
vehicle accidents because of better cars and roads, partly
offset by rising obesity (minus one year) and drug overdoses
(-0.3 years).
Winston on the Budget
He
writes: “There is a proverb that the wise man saves for
the future but the foolish man spends whatever he gets. This
has happened with the foolish Budget that has cut the
KiwiSaver kick-start grant of $1000 and failed to resume
payments to the Cullen superannuation fund.” A++ for
rhetoric, but one problem...
Borrowing isn’t
Saving
The KiwiSaver kick start wasn’t saving,
it was borrowing by government to give to those who
registered for Kiwisaver. And 38% of them just took the
$1,000, without any follow-up saving. The other 62 per cent
who did save were mostly those who would have saved anyway.
That’s right, KiwiSaver kick starts were probably adding
more to government debt than to citizens’
saving.
And the Cullen Fund
That’s
not saving either, unless the government has a surplus to
use. Otherwise it is borrowing to invest in debt and equity
markets. Given that the opposition parties have opposed
every savings measure since 2009, and dreamed up numerous
spending measures, they can’t really be taken seriously on
savings issues.
Norman Caught Picking
Cherries
Last week Russell Norman tweeted a
chart of the NZ trade-weighted index measure of the NZ
currency, suggesting it was “an ongoing problem for NZ”.
The chart was from 2009 to date, showing a general upward
trend for the NZ dollar. He cherry picked the year after the
GFC, when dollar dropped 25 per cent (it didn’t recover
its pre GFC level until 2013). This from the guy who
imperiously lectures us all about the global temperature
record. Just as well the Greens have changed their
co-Leader.
And Another Thing
A
stronger currency represents an increase in household
incomes, a boost to kiwi spending power, an increase in real
wages. Successful countries with solid growth and low
inflation tend to have currencies that drift higher over
time.
A Free Press Reader Writes
Why
can’t people renewing their passports in the next year
benefit from 10 year passports now? How hard is it to
change the expiry date line of a passport, make the
associated changes in the computer system and set a new
pricelist?
You expect small businesses around NZ to do
this all the time whenever you fiddle with taxes, charges
and
levies.