Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Goff Backs Kauri Bullies


Goff Backs Kauri Bullies

The campaign by a Titirangi neighbourhood to prevent two landowners legally felling their own tree has got a boost after Auckland Mayoral candidate Phil Goff gave his support yesterday. Affordable Auckland Mayoral candidate Stephen Berry thinks it is time all the declared Mayoral candidates give their position on the issue.

Berry says, “Goff from the left and Bright from the loony left have both shown they support replacing proper legal process with mob rule and that the invasion of private property by neighbourhood thugs and bullies is completely justified if it furthers their own causes.”

Mr. Goff has also stated that he is drafting a private members bill which will give greater protection to particular trees. “Essentially Mr. Goff is now using parliamentary resources to shore up his support in next year’s election which is completely inappropriate.”

“I am the only Mayoral candidate who has publically supported landowner’s Jon Lenihan and Jane Greensmith. The Kauri tree is their property and they have gone above and beyond their legal obligations to obtain permission to clear their own land. Whatever promises the protestors claim to have extracted when they prevented the tree’s felling back in March are irrelevant. There is no moral obligation to keep a promise extorted through coercion.”

As of yet, centre-right candidates Mark Thomas and Victoria Crone have been silent about the kauri debacle. “I’m sure the true blue ward of Orakei would be interested to hear their Local Board Deputy Chair’s view on whether private property rights are important to him,” Berry says. “Ms. Crone really ought to try expressing an opinion on something since her recent ‘no policy’ campaign launch.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Berry says the campaign by a group calling itself ‘Save Our Kauri’ really is a misnomer seeing as the Kauri tree in question is not collectively owned. “It isn’t our kauri, nor is it their Kauri. The Kauri belongs to Lenihan and Greensmith. While other people are welcome to hold an opinion on the future of the tree they should not be permitted to invade the owner’s property and occupy their land. It’s time the police stepped in to remove the illegal occupiers and allow the landowners to go about their legal business.”

Ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.