Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 


Time for an Education Commissioner?

Time for an Education Commissioner?


The Education Act 1989 is being reviewed, so now seems an ideal time to address the lack of a specialist complaints review and resolution body in the school sector. Establishing an Education Commissioner, like the Health and Disability Commissioner for health, would ensure consistency in complaint resolution across the education sector and relieve pressure on other bodies that are currently being asked to address issues outside their remit. The lack of any free, independent and flexible complaints resolution system standing between the school board and the Courts, or the Education Council’s disciplinary bodies, creates problems for parents and schools.

Currently, parents work through the school’s complaints procedure until they get to the board of trustees. However, if parents are dissatisfied with the board’s response, there is no clear path to resolve their complaint. It is not uncommon for parents to contact the Ministry of Education, the Education Review Office (ERO), the Ombudsman, the Police, and just for good measure, the media, either in rapid succession, or all at once, in the hope that one of these organisations will “hold the school to account”. Some feel they have no alternative but to go to the Courts.

Neither the Ministry nor ERO are complaints investigation bodies for individual complainants. The Ministry may advise a school on how to manage an ongoing complaint. However, if it recommends that the board obtain an independent investigation, the school usually bears the cost. The Ombudsman’s Office has a heavy workload and is limited by its empowering Act, so it cannot always deal with complaints as quickly or as flexibly as is needed in the school sector. The Police are not equipped for dealing with parental complaints where a crime has not been committed. However, each organisation has to respond to the complaint, which means the school may be dealing with enquiries from multiple organisations. This is anxiety-inducing and time-consuming for principals and boards, and frustrating for parents. Significant delays where the Ombudsman or the Courts are used can have a serious ongoing effect on a child’s education.

Into this mix comes the new Education Council, which will likely become another forum for complainants to target. In the interests of student safety, the Council has been given wide powers to investigate complaints against teachers. However, the Council is a professional standards body, so its focus is on teacher conduct and competence. It is not a general complaint investigation and resolution body for the education sector. This may not be immediately apparent to the public, as the Council’s online complaint form makes it easy for parents to file a complaint of any kind against a teacher or principal, sometimes without even raising the issue with the school first. Accordingly, there is a risk that the Council will have to deploy significant resource dealing with complaints from frustrated parents which essentially fall outside its remit.

In contrast, there is a marked difference between how patient complaints about a health practitioner are handled under the Health and Disability Commissioner Act 1994.

Like the Education Council’s disciplinary bodies, the professional disciplinary bodies of the Medical Council (for doctors) and the Nursing Council (for nurses) accept direct complaints from patients. However, the complainant is automatically referred back to the HDC in the first instance. It is usually only after a complaint has been fully investigated by the HDC that the Medical Council or Nursing Council will consider it.

The purpose of the HDCA is to promote and protect the rights of health consumers and disability services consumers, and to facilitate the “fair, simple, speedy, and efficient resolution of complaints relating to infringements of those rights”. The HDCA allows for a flexible approach to complaints, and recognises that a formal investigation is not always required. Complainants may be offered the services of a “patient advocate”, whose role is to help them to negotiate the health system and deal with concerns productively. In many circumstances, an advocate to negotiate the education system would be very helpful for parents. A further advantage of the Office of the HDC is that it applies consistent standards and processes to complaint resolution across the health sector.

It is difficult to understand why there is such a well-developed independent complaints investigation body in the health sector and none in the education sector. Parent complainants are not routinely referred to the Ombudsman as health sector complainants are referred to the HDC, and the Ombudsman does not have the HDC’s flexibility.

Further, the HDC’s services are free to complainants and providers, whereas school boards have to pay to resolve difficult complaints with the same degree of independence. This is not affordable for small schools.

So, as complaints increase and complainants become more persistent, the time is right to establish a complaints resolution body similar to the HDC in the education sector.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell:
On The Kim Regime

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, the US had a very clear objective and eventually offered a quid pro quo of the removal of some of its own missiles from Turkey. This time, there’s no clarity about what the US is seeking, or offering.

It hasn’t helped that the US and the global media consistently agree on calling North Korea and its leadership “crazy” and “irrational” and urging it to “come to its senses”. When you treat your opponent as being beyond reason, it gets hard to comprehend what their strategy is, let alone work out the terms of a viable compromise. More>>

 

Recovery: Economic Impact Of Kaikōura Quake Revealed

The report details the impact on small businesses and tourism caused by disruptions to transport infrastructure and the economic impacts... The impact on New Zealand’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the first 18 months following the earthquake has been estimated at $450-$500 million. More>>

ALSO:

Human Rights Commission: Urgent Need For Action On Seclusion And Restraint

Chief Human Rights Commissioner David Rutherford says that while the report makes for sobering reading, the focus should now be on how the recommendations can be used to reduce the occurrence of seclusion and restraint in New Zealand and, in circumstances where it is necessary, to improve practices. More>>

ALSO:

CORRECTIONS (March 2017):

SCHOOL SECLUSION ROOMS (2016):

$11bn Capital Spend, New Debt Target: Steven Joyce On Budget Priorities

First, delivering better public services for a growing country – providing all New Zealanders with the opportunity to lead successful independent lives... And finally, we remain committed to reducing the tax burden and in particular the impact of marginal tax rates on lower and middle income earners, when we have the room to do so. More>>

ALSO:

JustSpeak Report: Bail Changes To Blame For New Billion Dollar Prison

In 2013 criminal justice spending was falling and the Government was mulling over what to spend the money on. 3 years later there are 10,000 people in prison and a new billion dollar prison is announced. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 

LATEST HEADLINES

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Politics
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news