Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search


New home deposit rules could turn off 22% of investors

Media release
Horizon Research
July 20, 2016

New home deposit rules could turn off 22% of investors

The Reserve Bank’s move to increase the deposit needed for investors to buy a home above 30% will have a significant impact on the market.

New research finds 22% of those who said they were definitely going to buy an investment property during the next 12 months would no longer buy if deposits go above 30%.

Another 21% of definite investors said they would delay buying. 34% would still buy and 24% were unsure, according to new findings from nationwide surveying by Horizon Research.

The Reserve Bank announced on July 19, 2016, it is consulting on increasing the deposit rate for all but 5% of loans banks make to investors to 40%. The new policy would apply nationwide.

Horizon says the new policy will have a slightly greater impact in the Aucklandmarket: 29% of the Auckland respondents definitely looking to buy an investment property said they would not buy if the deposit required increased above 30%. 17% said they would delay buying, while 27% said they would still buy.

If the amount of deposit needed to raise a loan for a property were to rise above 30% for investors how would that impact you?ALLDefinitely looking to buy an investment property
I would not buy28%22%29%
I would have to delay buying14%21%17%
I would still buy17%34%27%
I really don't know42%24%26%
N (unweighted)1,8174722

Horizon conducted the survey of 1817 adults nationwide in the two weeks ending July 14.
It has a maximum margin of error overall of +/- 2.3%.

Results for “definite” buyers were chosen for the analysis instead of including those who said they “may buy” because Horizon’s research over the past six years on property selling and buying has indicated that the “definite” respondents give a better indication of likely property sales trends.

Horizon says it is also looking at the potential impacts of any Reserve Bank decision to restrict borrowing in relation to household income.

Preliminary findings indicate, on a national basis, respondents who were looking to buy an investment property in the next 12 months were slightly more in favour of implementing debt to income ratios in addition to controlling deposits than those who were looking to buy a home to live in. However, a majority of those in Auckland who were looking to buy an investment property were in favour of only controlling deposits and not implementing debt to income ratios.

© Scoop Media

Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: PPPs Are Steven Joyce’s New Imaginary Friend

Like the kid in that Bruce Willis movie who could see dead people, Finance Minister Steven Joyce can see stuff (like holes in Labour budgets) that no-one else can see.

So maybe it shouldn’t be all that surprising that Joyce can also see ‘efficiencies’ and ‘cost savings’ in funding major infrastructural projects through public private partnerships (PPPs). More>>


Indecision 2017: Election Day Results

National won 46% of the vote with Labour on 35.8%. NZ First won 7.5%, with the Greens on 5.8%. ACT held on to Epsom, but failed to get more MPs. The Maori Party were wiped out of Parliament. There are still special votes to be counted, but clearly National is in the box seat to form the next Government. Full preliminary results >>


Lyndon Hood: Election Lists

While the ship of state is listing, so I thought I would make some lists as well. More>>


Targetting: ACC’s Computer-Aided Decision-Making Questioned

University of Otago researchers are warning of the potential pitfalls in government departments using computer-based risk prediction models, as has been recently revealed through a controversial new tool used by the ACC... More>>


From The Hood: The Campaign Strategist’s Lament

"This election is a chance to really work the record of what nine years of National-led government has done to improve the country for everyone. Or will do. Another three years, maybe six. Thirty-three years, tops. You don’t want to risk that, do you? More>>

PSA Report: National Gets An ‘F’ For Health Funding

"Seeing National’s record on health collected in one place is quite sobering - it’s clear that underfunding is having dire consequences on both patients and staff, who are having to do more than ever with less," says Glenn Barclay, PSA national secretary. More>>





Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election
  • PublicAddress
  • Pundit
  • Kiwiblog