Free Press 5/9/16
Free Press
ACT’s regular
bulletin
Teacher
Unions’ Odd Position
Teachers will strike this
week, forcing parents all over the country to make
alternative arrangements. Their concern? That principals
and boards of trustees will be given more flexibility in how
they use their funding. They believe this will lead to
fewer teachers being employed, but why would that
be?
How it Plays out in Partnership
Schools
ACT’s Partnership Schools have total
flexibility in their funding. They have generally used this
flexibility to economise on material things and employ more
teachers. It is not clear why the teacher unions believe
state schools would use flexibility to employ fewer
teachers, unless…
Not All Teachers Are Created
Equal
The unions’ job (not the teachers’) is
to ensure all teachers get the same rigid pay scale
regardless of performance. Free Press visited a top
New Zealand firm that uses sophisticated 360 degree feedback
on staff behaviour and performance to set remuneration but
this is not possible under collective agreements.
The Realpolitik of Teachers’
Unions
The unions’ real concern about
flexibility is that it will affect their core business:
making sure the best teacher in New Zealand is paid the same
as the worst. A more flexible funding model (like what’s
used in Partnership Schools) could allow greater pay for
good teachers, at the expense of those who aren’t
producing solid results for their students.
Time
to TERF
We have had it suggested by several
former state school principals that while most teachers are
wonderful, children are held back by those who aren’t (we
can all remember one or two). The police used to have a
scheme called PERF (Police Employment Rehabilitation Fund)
that would pay out those who could no longer perform for
various reasons. Perhaps it is time to consider a dignified
exit for underperforming teachers who are just waiting to
collect their Superannuation – TERF?
Robbery and
Tobacco Taxes
Free Press has long
criticised the relentless increases in tobacco tax. In January ACT’s Free Thoughts pointed
out how it impoverishes the poorest New Zealanders and
Maori in particular with few people actually quitting along
the way. But there is another unintended consequence we
could have predicted – crime.
Black
Markets
Punitive taxes are a half-hearted
prohibition, a bit like how National argues it could use
stamp duties as a de facto ban on foreign homebuyers. With a
carton of cigarettes now worth almost $300, who is surprised
that there have been 17 robberies of tobacco in Christchurch
in the past seven weeks, using weapons including ‘guns,
hammers, knives, and axes?’
Slippery
Slopes
As David Seymour said in Parliament a few
months ago, plain packaging of cigarettes should frighten
all legitimate businesses. Once it’s accepted that the
Government will confiscate companies’ brands, the only
remaining question is ‘who’s next?’ We didn’t think
it would happen so soon, but university researchers now want
plain packaging for soft drinks and fast
food.
Costly Jihad
Everybody knows
that smoking is really bad for you, but smokers already pay
more in tax than they cost the health system, so it’s
their problem. If the motivation for tobacco control
policies is sheer do-gooding, how much crime and erosion of
business confidence will do-gooders accept, have they made
the calculation, do they care at all?
Burglary
Up
Burglary is up and even National MPs’
electorate offices are now being burgled. The police
minister says that the police will now attend every
burglary, but what will that mean? Police generally know
what is happening on their patch and prioritise accordingly.
We doubt that attending every burglary will increase the
resolution rate because most burglaries are carried out by
professionals too smart to leave traces. We wonder what
other crimes police will now not attend to.
Three
Strikes for Burglary
Earlier in the year ACT
tabled its Three Strikes for Burglary bill, but other MPs
objected to it being debated. The policy is very simple:
with resolution rates as low as they are, you have to commit
a lot of burglaries to be convicted three times, so you
should be sentenced to three years. ACT’s Three Strikes
for violent and sexual offences has been a success at
reducing reoffending for those crimes. ACT will continue
campaigning for a Three Strikes rule for
burglary.