Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Key and others talk nonsense on TPPA at APEC


21 November 2016

Key and others talk nonsense on TPPA at APEC: it’s not about Trump!

‘As political leaders from various Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) desperately dreamed up rescue packages at the APEC summit, they jettisoned any pretence this is about trade’, says University of Auckland law professor Jane Kelsey.

‘Talking up the prospect of some kind of TPPA is about justifying the political capital they have invested to push through a deeply unpopular agreement and defending the outdated ideology on which it is based.’

‘Their various options don’t bear scrutiny’ according to Professor Kelsey, ‘starting with the flippant suggestion from Prime Minister John Key that it will all be okay if they can flatter Donald Trump and get him to own the deal. Others said much the same, with Obama predicting Trump could abandon his anti-TPPA promise once in office, as Obama did about revisiting NAFTA.

But Kelsey observes that ‘this is not about Trump. The barrier to the TPPA in the US is the Congress. If Obama had the votes to support it, as he seems to have assured the other TPPA leaders, he would have put it through by now. He is short around 12 Republican votes. Analysts in Washington say the numbers get worse under the new Congress, with the House facing new elections in just two years. So forget the turnaround or the rebranding. The current deal is dead in America.’

‘Then we need to consider whether any of the countries have the stomach for a renegotiation with Trump to make more concessions when they have struggled to sell the current deal as the best outcome they could negotiate?’

‘The third idea - a TPPA without the US - is equally absurd.’ Professor Kelsey points out that all 12 parties would have to amend the existing rules for entry into force that require the US to be part. ‘Possibly Trump would do that. Or they could leave the current agreement in limbo and create a new one. ‘

Either way the deal would have to be renegotiated, adding to the sunk costs of nearly seven years’ negotiations. All the market access on autos, garments and agriculture, along with the rules of origin, are premised on US participation.

‘Why would any sane government voluntarily retain the suicidal chapters on intellectual property and state-owned enterprises that the US insisted on, knowing that would give US corporations the benefits for free?’, Kelsey asked.

‘And how could they claim such a deal has any economic credibility when the projected gains were so minimal even with the US involved and using studies that grossly inflated the outcomes?’

Either way the TPPA would not be the same as the agreement that just went through the Parliament. Standing Orders require a new or altered treaty to be tabled and reviewed by the select committee. The implementing legislation would have to be amended as well.

‘If National thought it was going to push a revised TPPA through without a fight, especially in an election year, it really does live on Planet Key. It is time to stop trying to defend the indefensible, including the negotiations on the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA) that are going to fill the TPPA vacuum’, Professor Kelsey said.

ends

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Back Again: Government Approves TPP11 Mandate

The Government has approved a negotiating mandate for Trans-Pacific Partnership 11 (TPP11), which will ensure New Zealand businesses remain competitive in overseas markets.

Trade Minister Todd McClay says New Zealand will be pushing for the minimal number of changes possible to the original TPP agreement, something that the remaining TPP11 countries have agreed on. More>>

ALSO:

.

 
 

Gordon Campbell: On Why Labour Isn’t Responsible For Barnaby Joyce

As a desperate Turnbull government tries to treat the Barnaby Joyce affair as a Pauline Hanson fever dream – blame it on the foreigners! We’re the victims of the dastardly New Zealand Labour Party! – our own government has chosen to further that narrative, and make itself an accomplice. More>>

ALSO:

Rail: Greens Back Tauranga – Hamilton – Auckland Service

The Green Party today announced that it will trial a passenger rail service between Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga starting in 2019, when it is in government. More>>

ALSO:

Housing: Voluntary Rental Warrant Of Fitness For Wellington

Wellington City Council is partnering with the University of Otago, Wellington, to launch a voluntary Rental Warrant of Fitness for minimum housing standards in Wellington, Mayor Justin Lester has announced. More>>

ALSO:

Treaty: Agreement In Principle Signed With Moriori

“The Crown acknowledges Moriori was left virtually landless from 1870, hindering its cultural, social and economic development. The Crown also acknowledges its contribution to the myths that the people of Moriori were racially inferior and became extinct." More>>

ALSO:

Susan Devoy: Call For Inquiry Into State Abuse Reaches UN

Race Relations Commissioner Dame Susan Devoy is in Geneva and has asked a United Nations committee to urge the New Zealand government to initiate an inquiry into the physical and sexual abuse of children and disabled people held in state institutions. More>>

ALSO:

(Not National): Cross-Party Agreement On Pike River Re-Entry

The commitment was signed this afternoon by the leaders of Labour, United Future, The Maori Party, and the Green Party and, together with the earlier commitment by New Zealand First, means that there is now a Parliamentary majority behind the families’ fight for truth and justice. More>>

ALSO:

Earlier:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election