Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

David Seymour’s End of Life Choice Bill

Right to Life requests that Members of Parliament support a culture of life, by voting down this contentious bill at its first reading. This was the prudent action of Parliament when defeating Michael Law’s Death with Dignity bill in 1995 and the Death with dignity bill of Peter Brown in 2003. It was these Parliaments, which courageously upheld the common good, defended the medical profession and recognised that it was not the role of Parliament to empower the strong to kill the weak or to decide who shall live and who shall die. This bill of David Seymour, hides murder under the guise of compassion, deserves the same fate; it simply has no place in our Parliament. The bill requires a doctor who is not prepared to terminate the life of his patient, or assist in his/her suicide to refer the patient to another doctor who will. This is an infringement of conscience rights and makes the doctor complicit in the killing of his/her patient. Parliament has a duty to protect the common good. It is for the common good that doctors uphold the Declaration of Geneva, which requires that doctors have the utmost respect for human life. It is for the common good that the community can continue to maintain its trust in the medical profession to do no harm and not to kill us.

Members of Parliament should be aware that the World Medical Association, the New Zealand Medical Association, the Australian & New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine, the New Zealand Nurses Organisation and Palliative Care Nurses New Zealand all uphold an ethic to cure and not to kill. This bill is a threat to not only the medical profession, but to the life of every person in New Zealand.

Here are some implications if this bill were enacted:

• Corruption of the culture in which medicine is practiced;

• Corruption of the profession of medicine by permitting killing to be practiced

• Fundamental distortion of the doctor–patient relationship, greatly reducing patients’ trust of doctors and doctors’ undivided commitment to the healing of their patients; and

• Creating perverse incentives for insurance providers and the financing of health care, as it is cheaper to kill than to care.

Should this bill ever become law it is very likely that it would not be possible for a doctor of conscience to practice medicine. Right to Life believes that ultimately it would be a condition of entry to our medical schools that any student would have to be prepared to kill a patient or assist in their suicide.

Euthanasia is part of a culture of death and seeks to seduce us by disguising itself as a culture of life. In Belgium it has corrupted palliative care by gaining entry to hospices by masquerading as part of end of life treatment, this is also happening in Quebec.

Members of Parliament have a serious duty to protect the medical profession and the community by treating this bill with the contempt it deserves, by voting a resounding no at its first reading.


ENDS


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

In the end, Mr Pragmatic calmly read the signs of impending defeat and went out on his own terms. You could use any number of clichés to describe Peter Dunne’s exit from Parliament.

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

 

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Why Labour Isn’t Responsible For Barnaby Joyce

As a desperate Turnbull government tries to treat the Barnaby Joyce affair as a Pauline Hanson fever dream – blame it on the foreigners! We’re the victims of the dastardly New Zealand Labour Party! – our own government has chosen to further that narrative, and make itself an accomplice. More>>

ALSO:

Rail: Greens Back Tauranga – Hamilton – Auckland Service

The Green Party today announced that it will trial a passenger rail service between Auckland, Hamilton and Tauranga starting in 2019, when it is in government. More>>

ALSO:

Housing: Voluntary Rental Warrant Of Fitness For Wellington

Wellington City Council is partnering with the University of Otago, Wellington, to launch a voluntary Rental Warrant of Fitness for minimum housing standards in Wellington, Mayor Justin Lester has announced. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election