Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Trans Tasman's Political Pulse: Ports Rationalisation

Trans Tasman's Political Pulse - July 04, 2017

Ports Rationalisation –
Is Competition A Waste Of Money?

INSIGHTS ABOUT THE NEWS - The decades old debate over whether there is a need for centralised decision making over rationalising NZ’s ports is back in focus again as the sector contemplates the possibility of wasting large amounts of money on capital.

As reported in the trans-Tasman’s sister publication, NZ Transport Intelligence Business Alert, the development of regional ports and their rivalry have long been a debating point. On one hand, the argument is competition will sort the issue out and bring rationalisation with the right roles for the right ports. Others argue NZ is too small and there should be centralised decision making about which ports handle the big ships.

It’s an issue which has been tossed around for decades, but has become more sharply focused as some local authority-owned ports press ahead with plans to be “big-ship capable.”

The capital’s Centreport wants to dredge Wellington Harbour. Port of Napier has plans for a $100m upgrade. Lyttelton has a $56m project to upgrade its facilities for cruise ships, which Mayor Lianne Dalziel says will not return its cost of capital but will provide economic benefits for the region. Port Otago has also won resource consent for dredging to make it big-ship capable.

Also, to complicate the issue, there is the ongoing argument about the Port of Auckland, with a strong lobby resenting the use of central city waterfront for a port and its storage usage. They are at odds with PoAL who want to expand.

Port of Tauranga chairman David Pilkington says the arrival of larger vessels means it is inevitable there will be fewer hub ports as it isn’t feasible to replicate 13 regional container ports with the freight volumes available.

Pilkington argues ports in general sit in local govt ownership and are viewed emotionally as essential to regional development. Pilkington says duplicating a whole lot of big ship-capable ports is clearly going to be a financial disaster.

At a time when investment capital for infrastructure is in short supply, the question must be asked: does NZ need half a dozen big-ship capable ports?

Trans Tasman’s sister publication, The New Zealand Transport Intelligence Business Alert, is a weekly source providing you with in-depth news, analysis and opinion on NZ’s transport and logistics sectors.

FREE! If you are not already a subscriber to Political Pulse, please sign up here for your personal copy.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Gordon Campbell: On DHB Deficits And Free Trade

Currently the world is looking on aghast at the Trump administration’s plans to slash Obamacare, mainly in order to finance massive tax changes that will deliver most of their gains to the wealthy. Lives will be lost in the trade-off. Millions of Americans stand to lose access to the healthcare they need.

Spot the difference with New Zealand, where DHBs are under intense pressure to reduce deficits within a climate of chronic underfunding. More>>

 
 

Greens' Response: Slum-Like Rentals Exposed In Renting Review

“...The grim findings of the review are a wakeup call about the true state of rentals in this country. Too many renters are festering in slum-like conditions under the thumb of landlords who have largely unchecked powers and ignore tenants’ complaints when it suits them.” More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The Life And Times Of Peter Dunne

The unkind might talk of sinking ships, others could be more reminded of a loaded revolver left on the desk by his Cabinet colleagues as they closed the door behind them, now that the polls in Ohariu had confirmed he was no longer of much use to National. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Campaign Launch

One of the key motifs of Ardern’s speech was her repeated use of the phrase – “Now, what?” Cleverly, that looks like being Labour’s response to National’s ‘steady as it goes’ warning against not putting the economic ‘gains’ at risk. More>>

ALSO:

Lyndon Hood: Social Welfare, Explained

Speaking as someone who has seen better times and nowadays mostly operates by being really annoying and humiliating to deal with, I have some fellow feeling with the current system, so I’ll take this chance to set a few things straight.. More>>

ALSO:

Deregistered: Independent Board Decision On Family First

The Board considers that Family First has a purpose to promote its own particular views about marriage and the traditional family that cannot be determined to be for the public benefit in a way previously accepted as charitable... More>>

ALSO:

Transport Policies: Nats' New $10.5bn Roads Of National Significance

National is committing to the next generation of Roads of National Significance, National Party Transport Spokesperson Simon Bridges says. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election