Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

New Zealand’s Defence Industry Unfairly Targeted

Media Release: New Zealand’s Defence Industry Unfairly Targeted

The New Zealand Defence Industry’s annual forum is due to convene on 10-11 October at Wellington’s Westpac Stadium, but with just one month to go, activists threaten to disrupt the event.

Activist group Peace Action Wellington (PAW) has petitioned joint owners of the stadium, Wellington City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council, to shut the event out. The group is also preparing to protest at the event, which will likely see them attempting to prevent delegates from accessing the venue.

The forum, say activists, is a “weapons expo”, and a key focus of their objections to the event appears to be the involvement of US defence and aerospace manufacturer Lockheed Martin as the event’s sponsor. Lockheed Martin make nuclear weapons.

At last year’s forum, held at the ANZ Viaduct Events Centre in Auckland, activists picketed the venue, stopping delegates from gaining entry. This no doubt penalised the many local companies who had hoped to network and promote their many non-weapons goods and services at the once-a-year forum.

New Zealand is rightly recognised as a world leader in nuclear non-proliferation efforts, and activism has played a key role in a nuclear-free New Zealand. Our ‘nuclear-free moment’ was, more accurately, the struggle of many people over many years that led to 1987’s New Zealand Nuclear Free Zone, Disarmament, and Arms Control Act.

Of the many fronts on which the continued anti-nuclear struggle is waged, however, the targeting of the defence industry forum is misguided and unfortunate.

For a start, labelling the event a “weapons expo” and suggesting that it profits from war is nothing sort of hyperbolic misrepresentation. It’s an extremely long bow to draw in relation to an industry that supplies and equips a Defence Force widely acknowledged as a force for good in New Zealand, the region and the world.

Apart from generating employment and enterprise, members of New Zealand’s defence industry supply goods and services – food, maintenance services, ICT, equipment (including weapons) – to our Defence Force and to New Zealand Government agencies responsible for ensuring the security of our borders, fisheries, environment, cyberspace, critical national infrastructure, national interests and international reputation.

They don’t use nuclear bombs. And New Zealand’s Government certainly doesn’t buy them. Not from Lockheed Martin. Not from anyone.

Protest can be a blunt and disproportionate weapon, and by targeting the forum and its main sponsor, activists inflict collateral damage on the members of a vitally important New Zealand industry.

It also smacks of hypocrisy. While activists exercise their right to freedom of expression and association to protest, they’ve shown that they’re prepared to do so in a way that denies local suppliers the opportunity to connect with potential procurers and to go about their business. It’s a disappointing irony given that their business just happens to help secure New Zealand and to safeguard the rights to which we are all entitled.

No doubt our government and the New Zealand Defence Industry Association respect the right for groups like PAW to protest – but they conversely have a right that they do so in a way that does not put at risk the safety of delegates or their ability to choose where they go and who they associate with.

The people of New Zealand are evidently proud of the work our Defence Force does, and proud of the role forum delegates play in their success – whether it’s providing boots for their personnel, technology for their systems, or flags for the ships that enable them to respond to natural disasters and humanitarian emergencies.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

Election Day Results

National won 46% of the vote with Labour on 35.8%. NZ First won 7.5%, with the Greens on 5.8%. ACT held on to Epsom, but failed to get more MPs. The Maori Party were wiped out of Parliament.

There are still special votes to be counted, but clearly National is in the box seat to form the next Government.

The Greens can not contemplate a deal with National. So, Winston Peters will have to make a choice and could back National or a combined Labour/Green coalition. Full preliminary results >>

 

Lyndon Hood: Election Lists

While the ship of state is listing, so I thought I would make some lists as well. More>>

ALSO:

Targetting: ACC’s Computer-Aided Decision-Making Questioned

University of Otago researchers are warning of the potential pitfalls in government departments using computer-based risk prediction models, as has been recently revealed through a controversial new tool used by the ACC... More>>

ALSO:

From The Hood: The Campaign Strategist’s Lament

"This election is a chance to really work the record of what nine years of National-led government has done to improve the country for everyone. Or will do. Another three years, maybe six. Thirty-three years, tops. You don’t want to risk that, do you? More>>

PSA Report: National Gets An ‘F’ For Health Funding

"Seeing National’s record on health collected in one place is quite sobering - it’s clear that underfunding is having dire consequences on both patients and staff, who are having to do more than ever with less," says Glenn Barclay, PSA national secretary. More>>

ALSO:

Children With Disabilities: Education Crisis Unaddressed

In 2008 IHC lodged its complaint against the on-going failure of New Zealand Governments and the Ministry of Education to ensure that disabled children access a quality education on an equal basis to others in New Zealand schools. More>>

Gordon Campbell: Ten Reasons For Not Voting National

if anyone you know is thinking of voting National in Saturday’s election, there’s still time for an intervention. You owe it to your friends and relations to intercede. Because there’s plenty of evidence on National’s mediocre-to-awful track record over its nine years in power. We can’t afford another three years of drift. More>>

ALSO:

Suffrage Day: PSA National Secretaries Vote For Equal Pay

PSA national secretaries Erin Polaczuk and Glenn Barclay are advance voting for the 2017 election alongside their daughters, with equal pay and fairness in mind on the 124th anniversary of women’s suffrage in New Zealand. More>>

ALSO:

Charge Protests: Dairy Farms Use Same Amount Of Water As 60 Million People

Using Dairy NZ numbers, economist Peter Fraser and agricultural consultant Dr Alison Dewes calculate the water consumption of New Zealand dairy farms is equivalent to the residential use of 60 million people. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured InfoPages

Opening the Election