Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Medical Cannabis Awareness NZ

Legal Protection for terminal cases misses the point.

MCANZ Coordinator Shane Le Brun, Center, with MCANZ Trustee Nichola Smith front left and various patients and supporters of MCANZ at parliament for the first reading of the Govt Medical Cannabis bill.

The Ministry of health has quietly released a trove of documents relating to the governments Medical Cannabis Bill, and it demonstrates, that without any truly external consultation, an opportunity has been missed to greatly extend legal protections.

It has been identified that Chronic Pain as promised by Labour is a broad category with many New Zealanders suffering chronic pain of varying intensity and there would be issues extending a statutory defence that far, or tightening up the definition of chronic pain fairly. As an in house bill with zero consultation outside of Govt, a simple remedy for a tighter definition has been missed. Instead of wasting coverage on the terminally ill, a tighter definition of chronic pain could have been employed. To this end a definition of “severe or debilitating condition” is what MCANZ supports and hopes to see implemented in the select committee process. This will not cover a generic mild case of chronic pain, such as common occurrences of osteoarthritis, but it would include protections for those who are routinely on Opioids such as fentanyl and oxycodone for significant pain and who are unable to work. It would also cover those with other severe conditions who could benefit, such as those with Crohn’s, Tourette’s and MS, providing the best of both worlds.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Says MCANZ Coordinator Shane Le Brun:

“Legal Protection for the terminally ill is a moot point, as the patient would odds on die during the prosecution process, and police would be more inclined to exercise discretion in such cases, such as publicly ignoring the long list of Cannabis offences committed by the late Helen Kelly. That is not an area of concern currently, we have many patients getting hauled before the courts, but none are on their deathbed.”

“What is concerning currently is the amount of patients with severe conditions that police execute raids on, and the vigorous prosecution of those patients who cultivate for their own supply”

“We don’t feel it is in the public interest to be prosecuting those who are in such a poor state that they have been unable to work for years, many are wheelchair bound, a definition of ‘Severe and Debilitating’ would aid these patients who need protecting from the police.”


“Its concerning that even the meagre coverage provided in the Government’s Cannabis bill was too much for police, while it was heartening to hear that Justice officials wanted coverage extended further. It speaks to how out of touch the police are on this issue”

“It is also encouraging that several MPs that MCANZ has met with recently have described our desire for protections to be extended for those with ‘severe or debilitating’ conditions as anything from ‘reasonable’ to a ‘no brainer’”

www.mcawarenessnz.org


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.