Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Minimal Interest For Same-Sex ‘Marriage’

3 May 2018


Five years on from the definition of marriage being changed, statistics show that the demand for same-sex ‘marriage’ has been insignificant, and has had to be boosted by overseas couples which represent almost half of all same-sex ‘marriages’ during this period.

There have been 78,942 traditional marriages of NZ residents during a four-year period (2014-2017) since the law was changed. Same-sex marriages during that time for NZ’ers were 1,866 representing just over 2% of total marriages – despite claims of a huge demand for same-sex marriage.

During the same four-year period, there were 1,785 ‘tourist’ same-sex ceremonies (48% of total same-sex weddings in NZ) and 10,092 ‘tourist’ marriages (only 12% of total opposite-sex marriages.)

Marriages(1) by relationship type
December
year
Same-sex couples(2)Opposite-sex couples(2)Total(2)
New Zealand resident marriages(3)
2014486 19,638 20,127
2015453 19,440 19,890
2016465 19,719 20,184
2017462 20,145 20,607

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Stats NZ 3 May 2018

“Supporters of redefining marriage have had to rely on ‘marriage tourism’ to justify the change. The demand for same-sex marriage has been underwhelming. The time, energy and cost of political resources around redefining marriage simply weren’t warranted,” says Bob McCoskrie, National Director of Family First NZ.

“Marriage ‘equality’ was never about equality because there are people who are still not able to marry. The politicians simply inserted a lie into the law. However, there are now pushes for extending the definition of marriage to allow for polygamy and group marriage. Redefining marriage was about deconstructing and weakening the meaning and purpose of marriage from its role as a specific culturally and historically bound institution – as so aptly put by Greens co-leader Metiria Turei.”

“In 2004, the government introduced Civil Unions and changed over 150 pieces of legislation to provide legal recognition and protection for other forms of relationships. The State should not have presumed to re-engineer a natural human institution,” says Mr McCoskrie.

ENDS


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.