Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Sentencing: R v Nuku

IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA
TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CRI-2017-044-004373
[2018] NZHC 2510

THE QUEEN
v
STEAD NUKU

[…]

Judgment:
26 September 2018

SENTENCING REMARKS OF DOWNS J

Introduction

[1] Mr Nuku, you are for sentence on two charges of wounding with intent to injure. Both are third-strike offences. This means I must impose the maximum penalty of seven years’ imprisonment. And, I must order you to serve the sentence without parole, unless that would be manifestly unjust.

[2] The Crown also seeks preventive detention. As you probably know, preventive detention is an indefinite sentence.

Facts

[3] You committed both offences at Auckland Prison in Paremoremo. Before I describe them, I address your first- and second-strike offences. All exhibit very serious violence.

[…]


[19] But for the three-strikes regime, I would have sentenced you to five years and one month imprisonment, subject only to a possible deduction for totality.12 I would have imposed a minimum period of two-thirds to denounce your offending and protect the public. So, you would have received a substantial term of imprisonment, with a correspondingly long minimum, meaning non-parole period.
[20] Against this background, I am satisfied parole ineligibility for the duration of the mandatory sentence of seven years’ imprisonment would not be manifestly unjust.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

[…]

Preventive detention

[26] Preventive detention may be imposed when a person is convicted of a qualifying offence, was 18 years or over at the time the offence was committed, and the Court is satisfied the offender is likely to commit a qualifying offence after serving a finite sentence. There is no dispute the first two of these are met.
[27] The question is whether you are likely to commit a qualifying violent or sexual offence on release. Even then a discretion remains. Preventive detention is not a sentence of last resort, but it is exceptional. A long but determinate sentence is preferable when it would adequately protect the community.

[…]

[40] Mr Nuku, would you now please stand:

(b) You must serve at least seven years’ imprisonment.

This sentence is concurrent on your existing ones.

[41] Please stand down.

Full sentencing notes: 2018NZHC2510RvNuku.pdf

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.