Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Work smarter with a Pro licence Learn More

Gordon Campbell | Parliament TV | Parliament Today | News Video | Crime | Employers | Housing | Immigration | Legal | Local Govt. | Maori | Welfare | Unions | Youth | Search

 

Higher taxes for super rich gets voter tic

“Higher taxes for super rich gets voter tic”

“Taxes, taxes, taxes, and all the rest is b******t.” That was the message that went viral at the Davos Economic Forum last month, and it’s the message our Government needs to hear if it wants to tackle inequality in New Zealand.

The “Taxes, taxes, taxes” challenge came from Rutger Bregman, a Dutch historian, who told the rich and famous at Davos that amid all the talk of justice and equality, no one was raising the real problem, which was the rich not paying their fare share.

Bregman’s views have been widely applauded, and they offer a lesson for New Zealand as the Government considers the soon-to-be released Tax Working Group Report. It’s clear there’s going to be a lot of noise from all sides about the merits of taxation on capital gains. But what we really need is a debate on the much larger question of what is the most appropriate level of taxation for New Zealand.

Government spending in New Zealand is currently limited to 30 percent of GDP, most of which comes from taxation. Somehow we have both a Government and an opposition wedded to this figure as if it were the holy grail of running a modern economy. It’s not, and sticking to such an arbitrary cap is a mistake. It is among the lowest level of government spending in the OECD, with governments in most developed countries spending over 40% percent of GDP.

Our low level of government spending is why New Zealanders are dying of cancer while they’re on hospital waiting lists, it is why we spend too little on mental health. It means well-off parents pay additional ‘voluntary’ school levies while schools in poorer areas cannot even begin to get that sort of assistance from their community. It is why we have disgracefully high levels of child poverty.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Are you getting our free newsletter?

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.

Taxation is the cost we pay for living in a fair and functioning modern society, and we need to start the tax debate with a dose of realism, by looking not just at capital gains tax, but at overall levels of taxation and spending.

There are two arguments we will hear opposing higher levels of tax. The first is that increasing tax levels will limit economic progress. In fact, one of the periods of strongest growth was in the post-war period when tax rates were much higher than at present. The post-war boom in the USA saw tax rates as high as 90 percent on the wealthy. But we are not advocating those tax levels. We must pay more, and somewhere over 40 percent is absolutely affordable.

The second argument will be that the private sector and individuals can make better decisions on spending than the government can. While that may be true in some parts of the economy, when it comes to things like health, education and social safety nets, a strong public sector is the only way to run a fair society.

We must broaden the discussion, and talk about paying more tax. Our tax system certainly needs to include a tax on capital gains, and higher taxes for the wealthy and those in high-paying jobs. But it will also mean less inequality and fairer access to health, education and social supports. We need to focus on the benefits rather than the costs and stop pretending we can have a fair society with current low levels of taxation.


© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On Labour’s Fear Of Commitment


For 20 years or more, the case for a meaningful capital tax gains has been mulled over and analysed to death, including by the tax working group chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More than once, the International Monetary Fund has said a CGT would be a good idea for New Zealand. Regardless, it seems that Chris Hipkins and his Labour Party team will need two more years of careful scrutiny before they might possibly, could perhaps, might conceivably be willing to adopt a CGT as official Labour policy, by around the time that Election 2026 rolls around. We can hardly wait...
More


 
 

Government: Concerns Conveyed To China Over Cyber Activity
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity... More

ALSO:


Government: GDP Decline Reinforces Government’s Fiscal Plan

Declining GDP for the December quarter reinforces the importance of restoring fiscal discipline to public spending and driving more economic growth, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says... More

ALSO:


Government: Humanitarian Support For Gaza & West Bank

Winston Peters has announced NZ is providing a further $5M to respond to the extreme humanitarian need in Gaza and the West Bank. “The impact of the Israel-Hamas conflict on civilians is absolutely appalling," he said... More


Government: New High Court Judge Appointed

Judith Collins has announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister Jason Scott McHerron as a High Court Judge. Justice McHerron graduated from the University of Otago with a BA in English Literature in 1994 and an LLB in 1996... More

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.