Video | Business Headlines | Internet | Science | Scientific Ethics | Technology | Search


Application to Present Rebuttal Evidence

19 February 2001

The Royal Commission on Genetic Modification
Dalmuir House
The Terrace
PO Box 3554

Application to Present Rebuttal Evidence

1. On 1 February the Green Party presented the evidence of Dr Elaine R Ingham.

2. The main conclusion presented by Dr Ingham is that a genetically engineered Klebsiella planticola bacterium, if released into the environment, has the potential to kill all terrestrial plant life on the planet.

3. Her further assertion is that US authorities approved field trials involving the modified bacterium with little or no understanding of the ecological consequences and it was only as a result of independent action by herself and a student Michael Holmes that possible environmental disaster was avoided.

4. Dr Ingham cites a paper: Holmes, M. and E.R. Ingham. (1999) Ecological effects of genetically engineered Klebsiella planticola released into agricultural soil with varying clay content. Appl. Soil Ecol. 3:394-399. to justify reaching the above conclusions.

5. It is the opinion of three scientists (Drs Walter, Berridge and Tribe) who have reviewed the published results of the research undertaken by Holmes and Ingham, that Dr Ingham's conclusions are not substantiated by that research, and are therefore scientifically unsustainable.

6. The NZ Life Sciences network is presenting this rebuttal statement because it is the strong opinion of the scientists who have reviewed the evidence that Dr Ingham has presented unsupported and inaccurate information to the Royal Commission by incorrectly interpreting published scientific information. They are of the opinion that Dr Ingham's assertions have no scientific validity.

7. It is also the Network’s rebuttal evidence that Dr Ingham’s assertions about approval of field trials by the US authorities is incorrect. We wish to present evidence to the contrary.

8. The NZ Life Sciences Network shares the concern of the three reviewers about the scientifically unsupportable and exaggerated assertions made, and that a number of other submitters have relied on those assertions to support their own claims about the impacts of genetic modification.

9. A detailed paper from Dr Christian Walter, Dr Michael Berridge and Dr David Tribe setting out the evidence from Dr Ingham we wish to rebut and the details of the further evidence in rebuttal is attached.

10. The Network was unable to address these matters in its main submission and evidence because we were unaware of the specific assertions being made by Dr Ingham and the Green Party until their evidence was presented on 1 February 2001, several months after the Network’s case was prepared.

11. Please confirm receipt of this application and please advise me promptly whether the Royal Commission intends to grant our application for submission of rebuttal evidence.

Yours sincerely

Francis Wevers
Executive Director

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Scoop 3.0: How You Can Help Scoop’s Evolution

We have big plans for 2018 as we look to expand our public interest journalism coverage, upgrade our publishing infrastructure and offer even more valuable business tools to commercial users of Scoop. More>>

Statistics: Butter At Record $5.67/Block; High Vegetable Prices

Rising dairy prices have pushed food prices up 2.7 percent in the year to October 2017, Stats NZ said today. This followed a 3.0 percent increase in the year to September 2017. More>>


Science: New Research Finds Herbicides Cause Antibiotic Resistance

New University of Canterbury research confirms that the active ingredients of the commonly used herbicides, RoundUp, Kamba and 2,4-D (glyphosate, dicamba and 2,4-D, respectively), each alone cause antibiotic resistance at concentrations well below label application rates. More>>


CO2 And Water: Fonterra's Environment Plans

Federated Farmers support Fonterra’s bold push to get to zero emissions of CO2 on the manufacturing side of the Co-operative, both in New Zealand and across its global network. More>>


Fisheries: Decision To Delay Monitoring ‘Fatally Flawed’

Conservation group representatives say a decision by the new Minister of Fisheries, Stuart Nash, to delay implementation of camera monitoring of fishing efforts in New Zealand is ‘fatally flawed’. More>>


Kaikōura Quakes: One Year On

State Highway One and the railway were blocked by damage and slips and the Inland Road suffered significant damage. Farms, homes and businesses suffered building and land damage. Power and internet went down, drinking water systems, sewage systems and local roads were all badly affected... More>>


  • Bill Bennett on Tech