Video | Business Headlines | Internet | Science | Scientific Ethics | Technology | Search


Public view considered unimportant by Govt

Public view considered unimportant by government and regulatory agencies. Industry lobby rules GE policy.

Over 95% of the 10,000 submissions received by the Royal Commission of Inquiry into GM raised serious concerns over genetic engineering, yet many submitters were refused their requests to speak to their submissions.

The final report showed that information received after the process and during the preparation may well have been inaccurate and deliberately false. In one such case (Chapter 4 L-Tryptophan) there is no worldwide documentation to support the findings in the final paragraph. The Royal Commission report did not reflect the scientific findings presented to them, and at the time it was held there was virtually no research into risk effects, either completed or published.

The Commission did however recognise that there were wide gaps in knowledge. Research is now being addressed with the assistance of FoRST funding but results will take another 5 years to complete and still no health studies have been commissioned.

William Rolleston of the Life Science Network recently referred to GE Free proponents saying, "In many cases they stood aside from the democratic process and now want to force their unacceptable ideas on the rest of us".

Claire Bleakley of GE Free New Zealand in Food and Environment stated " We have been making submissions to ERMA and FSANZ for over 5 years now, most submission processes indicate that 99% of submitters are opposed to the GE applications, yet they are consistently ignored. It appears any that a lack of industry participation in the submission process may be due, as in the UK, to the fact that most of the advisors to GE policy have links to the GE industry".

GE Free New Zealand in Food and Environment call on Government to declare what advice they are receiving and from whom. How many advisors and politicians are linked to the GE industry? How many times have government been lobbied by biotech and pharmaceutical company representatives?

The government and their regulatory agencies have refused representation from the GE Free coalition to discuss GE policy, yet have apparently been readily open to advice from others, on serious issues of importance to New Zealand agriculture, such as Novartis in relation to the Corngate fiasco?

“The majority of the public are against the use of GE in food and our environment and have been poorly consulted, despite the use of their taxes to support this controversial technology. A lack of proper media discussion of the issues, until extremely recently, has also ensured the public have been kept in the dark.”

© Scoop Media

Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines


Media Mega Merger: StuffMe Hearing Argues Over Moveable Feast

New Zealand's two largest news publishers are appealing against the Commerce Commission's rejection of the proposal to merge their operations. More>>


Approval: Northern Corridor Decision Released

The approval gives the green light to construction of the last link of Auckland’s Western Ring Route, providing an alternative route from South Auckland to the North Shore. More>>


Crown Accounts: $4.1 Billion Surplus

The New Zealand Government has achieved its third fiscal surplus in a row with the Crown accounts for the year ended 30 June 2017 showing an OBEGAL surplus of $4.1 billion, $2.2 billion stronger than last year, Finance Minister Steven Joyce says. More>>


Mycoplasma Bovis: One New Property Tests Positive

The newly identified property... was already under a Restricted Place notice under the Biosecurity Act. More>>

Accounting Scandal: Suspension Of Fuji Xerox From All-Of-Government Contract

General Manager of New Zealand Government Procurement John Ivil says, “FXNZ has been formally suspended from the Print Technology and Associated Services (PTAS) contract and terminated from the Office Supplies contract.” More>>