Cablegate: Media Reaction: U.S.-Taiwan Relations


DE RUEHIN #2623/01 3530914
R 190914Z DEC 07





E.O. 12958: N/A

1. Summary: Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news
coverage December 19 on the controversy over the "one-step" and
"two-step" voting formats for the 2008 legislative elections; on the
arrest of a former Ministry of Justice Investigation Bureau
operative Tuesday who has allegedly threatened President Chen
Shui-bian and several DPP and KMT politicians; on Japan's successful
test of SM3 missile defense system Tuesday; and on the presidential
elections in South Korea today. The pro-independence "Liberty
Times" ran an exclusive news story on page two with a banner
headline saying "On the Topic of Dirty Tricks, U.S. Official Says It
is [Vincent] Siew, Not [Raymond] Burghardt Who Has Brought It up."
The English-language "Taipei Times," the sister paper of the
"Liberty Times," also ran the same full story in English on its
front page.

2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, a "Liberty Times" op-ed
criticized AIT Chairman Raymond Burghardt's comment on Taiwan's UN
referendum and urged KMT vice presidential candidate Vincent Siew to
state clearly what he said during his meeting with Burghardt on
December 8. A "Taipei Times" op-ed also urged Washington to "do the
right thing" and support Taiwan's membership in the international
organizations. End summary.

A) "Please State It Plainly and Clearly"

Chang Teh-chien, general secretary of the Presbyterian Church in
Taiwan, opined in the pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation:
720,000] (12/19):

"... AIT Chairman Raymond Burghardt's visit to Taiwan was official
by nature; he came to Taiwan prior to the presidential election, so
the timing was highly sensitive. Visiting Taiwan in his capacity as
a diplomatic envoy and coming from the United States of America,
which honors democracy and freedom as its founding principles,
Burghardt was supposed to speak up for Taiwan in a respectful and
supportive manner with regard to the democratic and rational means
the Taiwan people plan to adopt to voice their will, and to make
Taiwan a world model of 'founding its nation by peaceful and
democratic means.' Unexpectedly, Burghardt, as if in an attempt to
interfere with Taiwan's domestic affairs, cited a farfetched reason
such as 'it [i.e. the UN referendum] may possibly affect
cross-Strait peace' and told this to a vice presidential candidate.
The move [by Burghardt] was highly inappropriate in terms of his
status as a diplomatic envoy. Also, Burghardt seems to have
forgotten that had people like George Washington and Benjamin
Franklin accepted the principle of 'sacrificing justice for the sake
of peace' more than two hundred years ago, would the United States
and the UN have been able to claim themselves to be the 'defenders
of human rights' nowadays? The Taiwan people like to become friends
with people from other countries, but they definitely will not
accept hypocrites who interfere and suppress them in the excuse of
fake friendship. ..."

B) "The US Needs to Do the Right Thing"

Chen Wen-yen, executive director of the Washington-based Formosan
Association for Public Affairs, opined in the pro-independence,
English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 30,000] (12/19):

"... On Dec. 6, Deputy Assistant US Secretary of State Thomas
Christensen reiterated his opposition to the referendum, while a few
days later, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Chairman Ray
Burghardt made similar statements during a visit to Taipei. These
statements are undermining democracy in Taiwan and are playing into
China's hands. As an organization of US citizens of Taiwanese
descent we find this unacceptable. ... The statements by
Christensen and Burghardt are also antithetical to keeping a level
playing field in Taiwan.

"By singling out the Democratic Progressive Party's referendum and
not saying anything about a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
referendum -- which also supports joining the UN -- Christensen and
Burghardt are taking sides in an internal Taiwanese debate and are
influencing the election campaign. No doubt their statements will be
played up by the pan-blue press. In opposing the referendum, the US
officials are regrettably doing the bidding of the authoritarian
leaders of China. Beijing long ago learned that the shortest way to
Taipei is through Washington and is now manipulating the US into
trying to 'control' Taiwan. In spite of US denials, it is letting
itself be used to 'co-manage' Taiwan. ...

"Christensen and Burghardt also made statements to the effect that
they want to stick to the faulty and outdated 'one China' policy.
We would like to quote one of Burghardt's own statements: 'One of
the wonderful things about democracy is that when new leaders come
in, the new leaders present a new opportunity.' We certainly hope
that, when a new leader comes into power in Washington, he or she
will see fit to ditch the anachronistic 'one China' policy and
replace it with a pragmatic policy based on the reality that Taiwan

is a free and democratic nation in its own right. In the meantime,
we of course hope that the administration of US President George W.
Bush will be sensible and rational on the issue of the DPP's
referendum, and not overreact. For the time being, it should remain
quiet on the issue and let democracy in Taiwan take its course.


© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Ramzy Baroud: Year in Review Will 2018 Usher in a New Palestinian Strategy

2017 will be remembered as the year that the so-called ‘peace process’, at least in its American formulation, has ended. And with its demise, a political framework that has served as the foundation for US foreign policy in the Middle East has also collapsed. More>>


North Korea: NZ Denounces Missile Test

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has denounced North Korea’s latest ballistic missile test. The test, which took place this morning, is North Korea’s third test flight of an inter-continental ballistic missile. More>>


Campbell On: the US demonising of Iran

Satan may not exist, but the Evil One has always been a handy tool for priests and politicians alike.

Currently, Iran is the latest bogey conjured up by Washington to (a) justify its foreign policy interventions and (b) distract attention from its foreign policy failures.

Once upon a time, the Soviet Union was the nightmare threat for the entire Cold War era – and since then the US has cast the Taliban, al Qaeda, and Islamic State in the same demonic role. Iran is now the latest example…More

Catalan Independence:
Pro-independence parties appear to have a narrow majority. More>>