World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


Colin Powell IVs: Fox News And ABC

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Office of the Spokesman For Immediate Release November 18, 2001


INTERVIEW

Secretary Of State Colin L. Powell On Fox News With Tony Snow

November 18, 2001

QUESTION: The Taliban on the run, al-Qaida on the defensive. What's next? We'll ask Secretary of State Colin Powell.

Joining us now, Secretary of State Colin Powell.

Secretary Powell, let's respond to the latest news. The Northern Alliance, I gather, actually has now agreed to hold meetings outside of Afghanistan to try to form a new government.

SECRETARY POWELL: Yes, Jim Dobbins, the United States ambassador to the Northern Alliance, who has been over there for the last several days, met with the foreign minister of the Northern Alliance in Tashkent.

And as a result of that meeting, the Northern Alliance has agreed that they would send representatives to a meeting chaired by the Mr. Brahimi, who is Secretary General Kofi Annan's representative for this matter. Now, where that meeting will be held is yet to be decided, but I'm very pleased that the Northern Alliance has now shown a willingness to participate in that meeting.

QUESTION: Any timetable on a meeting?

SECRETARY POWELL: As soon as possible, I'm quite sure is what Mr. Brahimi is hoping for, but I cannot give you a specific timetable. But I would hope it would be within days, not within weeks. We've got to get this moving. And the purpose of the meeting would be to bring together a number of leaders representing different parts of Afghanistan, different ethnicities, different tribes, and see if we can get an interim government in place and then stand up a broader government over time.

QUESTION: The Northern Alliance covers a lot of the northern tribes, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Hazara -- but, obviously, the Pashtun in the south may be the most important element to get in there. Do you have agreement now that there's going to be Pashtun cooperation?

SECRETARY POWELL: Yes. Mr. Brahimi has agreement that there will be Pashtun representatives at this meeting. The holdup has been the Northern Alliance and, with this announcement today, we should be able to move forward quickly.

QUESTION: There's been a lot of talk of the former King, Zahir Shah, heading up some sort of caretaker government. Is that still on the table?

SECRETARY POWELL: I think the King plays an important role, a symbolic role. I don't want to prejudge what the discussions might lead to, but it seems to me that his role would continue to be symbolic, as opposed to being the executive or the chief executive of the new government.

QUESTION: Now, there's been some skepticism in the past about the Northern Alliance. One of the reasons that we feared their setting up a government is they didn't have a whole lot of success the first time around. How are they behaving right now?

SECRETARY POWELL: Quite well. They have kept the bulk of their forces outside of Kabul, which is what we hoped they would do and asked them to do. They did send security forces into the city, and as a result of that, the city has been relatively calm compared to what happened last time they were in Kabul, and compared to what we thought might happen. So things are going rather well right now.

Mr. Rabbani went back into Kabul, but he made it clear that he was still supporting a broad-based government to be formed. He represents a minority of the Afghan people, and he understands that. And for us not to go back to the kind of Afghanistan we've seen in the past, we need this broad-based coalition, and I'm pleased that he understands that and wants to participate in the creation of this coalition.

QUESTION: Is it your sense now that the Taliban, the Afghan elements in the Taliban have, for the most part, fled and what remains are Arab fighters who are not themselves Afghan citizens?

SECRETARY POWELL: Yes. Arab fighters are the toughest, but there are still Taliban elements that are fighting in Kunduz, up in the north, as your reporter noted, as well as in Kandahar in the south. So this war is not over. It will continue for a while, until the Taliban power is totally cracked and other tribes in the south start to reassert control.

Let's also keep in mind that our political objective was to get al- Qaida, that terrorist network, and to get Usama bin Laden. So the United States' political objective and military objective will not be satisfied until we have done that in Afghanistan. And the broader strategic objective that President Bush had was to go after al-Qaida in all of the 50 countries it's located in around the world, each one of them capable of designing and executing a terrorist attack, and also to go after terrorism in general.

So let's not see this as all suddenly coming to an end. It's a long- term campaign against terrorism that will take years, and we'll stick with it.

QUESTION: Are we closing in on bin Laden?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, a lot of reports suggest that his freedom to maneuver has become quite limited. And I don't think there's any country in the region that would be anxious to give him guest privileges if he showed up.

QUESTION: Do you think he's still in Afghanistan?

SECRETARY POWELL: I think he's still in Afghanistan, simply because I have seen no intelligence or information to suggest he has left Afghanistan, and I don't know of any country in the region that would be very anxious to see him arrive.

So I think he's still in Afghanistan, and it's getting harder for him to hide, as more and more territory is removed from Taliban control.

QUESTION: There's also word that al-Qaida fighters are actually turning on Taliban fighters. Is there some prospect that maybe some Taliban fighters may ultimately be the ones who point the finger at where bin Laden is?

SECRETARY POWELL: It could well be. There's quite a reward out there. And, as they start to realize that there is no future hanging around with either the al-Qaida organization or, for that matter, with the Taliban regime, it wouldn't surprise me to see some people start to make more informed choices about where their best interests lie.

QUESTION: Allied forces came across a safe house recently. It had a lot of evidence that there were some attempts to develop weapons of mass destruction. What do we think bin Laden has?

SECRETARY POWELL: I don't think he has a nuclear weapon. I think that's quite unlikely. And the material that we've seen in these safe houses certainly suggests that he was interested in one and they were moving in that direction, but it doesn't seem to me that we've seen anything that would suggest he had one or was close to having one.

QUESTION: Do we think he has radioactive material?

SECRETARY POWELL: I can't confirm that. I don't know. We are always interested in fissile material that might be loose or has gotten away from those nations that have such material. But I can't confirm that he ever got his hands on any.

QUESTION: All right. So, we should or should not worry about a dirty nuke?

QUESTION: You should always worry about someone who is trying to develop a nuclear device or dirty material to spread around or chemical or biological weapons. But at the moment, I don't think that Mr. bin Laden had reached that level of capability, with respect to nukes anyway.

QUESTION: Let us suppose Usama bin Laden somehow got out of Afghanistan, either into Pakistan or a neighboring country. Have we worked out arrangements with those governments that our forces could pursue him across borders?

SECRETARY POWELL: With the countries that you have identified, I'm quite confident that they would be more than anxious to detain him. If it's an element or a situation of hot pursuit, I'm sure we would coordinate with them if we were hot on his trail. But they have been very cooperative, and he is not going to find a safe haven in Pakistan or Uzbekistan or Tajikistan or Turkmenistan or Iran...

QUESTION: China?

SECRETARY POWELL: I don't even think in China. I mean, I don't think this fellow is going to be welcomed anywhere. He is an outcast. He is a murderer. He's a terrorist. The whole world recognizes that. And he is on the run, just as the President said he would be. And we will get him.

QUESTION: A story in today's Washington Post says that the Central Command, headed by General Tommy Franks, has to sign off on specific kinds of operations against the Taliban fighters and al-Qaida fighters and, as a consequence, on a number of occasions, the permission has returned to the region so late that they were not able to strike those targets. Is that how it ought to work?

SECRETARY POWELL: I can't talk to those stories because, although I used to be in that system, I'm not in the targeting system now. But, based on my experience, there was always creative discussion between the targeters and the lawyers and others when you go after targets. We are a nation of law. And we are also a nation that wants to minimize civilian casualties. So you always have these kinds of discussions.

But I'm quite confident that General Tommy Franks, a terrific commander who's done a great job, is able to resolve these matters in a way that is appropriate. And I'm also quite sure that Secretary Rumsfeld and his associates have been in a position to make determinations as well.

So I read the story, but I can't say much more about it except, these things go on. And you have a method to resolve any difficulties or differences with the commander, General Franks, who we have great confidence in, and Secretary Rumsfeld, who has great experience in these kinds of matters.

QUESTION: Has General Franks gotten a bad rap?

SECRETARY POWELL: Yes. I mean, two weeks ago everybody was beating up on Tommy. He's a great commander. But he didn't satisfy people two weeks ago. Now everything's falling in place. Such is the nature of celebrity life in Washington and in the United States.

QUESTION: Well, you're a celebrity. Tomorrow you're going to head to the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville and deliver a speech on the Middle East.

SECRETARY POWELL: Right.

QUESTION: The Administration's position is we would like to see a Palestinian state next to a safe and secure Israeli state. We don't have that right now. What does Yasser Arafat need to do?

SECRETARY POWELL: He needs to get the violence down. He needs to make a 100 percent effort to end all the violence. And we need to see results that reflect that 100 percent effort.

And in my speech tomorrow, I will lay out the vision that we have for the region, a vision of hope and promise. I will lay out what the United States is prepared to do to push this process forward. Both sides have to do certain things. And I hope it will be just a comprehensive statement.

I am not introducing a new plan. People keep asking for a new plan. We have a plan. It's a solid plan. It's called the Mitchell Committee Report. It leads to the kinds of negotiations that are required to settle these issues. But the only way you get to those negotiations is to enter the front door of the Mitchell Plan by getting the violence down. And until that happens, we're not going to go anywhere. And a new plan coming in from the flank isn't what's going to do it.

It's both sides working together, finding ways to talk to each other, so that we can get a real cease-fire in place. And we can use that cease- fire to start rebuilding trust and confidence, get openings in the region so people can go back and forth and get to their jobs. And when you start to build that level of trust, then you're on your way to the negotiations called for in the Mitchell Plan.

QUESTION: It's our position that Hizballah, Islamic Jihad, HAMAS and a number of other organizations are terrorist outfits.

SECRETARY POWELL: We have so identified them.

QUESTION: Yasser Arafat has talked about forming a coalition government with them. Should it be incumbent on him to go back on that proposal and say, no, no, no, and make them outcasts also in his midst?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, we think that these organizations have been so identified, as you described them. And we deal with the Palestinian Authority. And any coalition that brings into that coalition the sorts of organizations that practice those kinds of activities, we would have to take, you know, a dim view of that.

QUESTION: The State Department also has taken a pretty dim view of their operations, those organizations in Syria. Is Syria a potential target in the future if it does not go ahead and try to go after at least a dozen identified terrorist groups that are operating freely out of Damascus?

SECRETARY POWELL: I met with the Syrian foreign minister last week in New York at the United Nations General Assembly. And we had a very straightforward, you know, three-feet-apart, eyeball-to-eyeball talk. And I said, terrorism is terrorism. And terrorism masquerading as freedom fighters who go out and kill innocent people are not freedom fighters; they're terrorists.

And in order for us to move forward in our relationship -- the United States and Syria -- and to get the past behind us to see if that's what you want to do, you have to recognize that we will not ignore this kind of activity that is sponsored or supported by Syria or finds a safe haven in Syria. So we've had some rather direct conversations with the Syrians. They have said and done some things and have cooperated with us recently that suggest that they're looking for a better relationship with the United States, and maybe there are opportunities here that we can now explore.

QUESTION: You also have shaken hands with Iran's foreign minister. The Iranian people like us; the government does not. Do you think that government is going to fall sometime?

SECRETARY POWELL: I have no way of knowing. And the government really has two parts to it, really.

QUESTION: An elected part and then you've got the mullahs.

SECRETARY POWELL: You have the religious leader, Mr. Khamenei, and then Mr. Khatami, the president. And clearly there's tension between those two elements of the Iranian political leadership. And you can just see the Iranian people bubbling, wanting more freedom, wanting more access to what the 21st-century world offers to people who are ready to come out and play in the 21st-century world. And so, hopefully, we can explore new opportunities with the Iranians as well.

But we have no illusions about the nature of that regime. It has not meant us well. And it is developing weapons of mass destruction that cause us a great deal of concern. And the Iranian foreign minister and I were together last week at a meeting on Afghanistan. And it was the same morning that we lost the airplane, the American Airlines airliner, coming out of Kennedy. And he gave a very gracious statement of condolences to the American people and to those who lost their lives. I thanked him and shook his hand to express my appreciation for his message of condolence.

QUESTION: The Russians just sold nuclear plant technology to the Iranians. I think that probably violates the Iran Nonproliferation Act. That law calls for the United States to impose sanctions on companies that do the sales. Are we going to do that?

SECRETARY POWELL: We are in constant discussions with the Russians with respect to their cooperation with the Iranians and their sale of power plant components to the Iranians and other things they sell to the Iranians. We have had rather tense discussions with the Russians, and we made it clear to them that anything that leads to the ability of the Iranians to develop any weapons of mass destruction, especially nuclear weapons, and the means to deliver them, the United States will find it as very, very troubling, and it will affect our relationship. The Russians have responded that they understand that and they are not making those kinds of sales.

So, we are still in discussions with the Russians on this one. There is nothing to be invoked at the moment. But it has been a consistent element in our discussions.

QUESTION: Okay. A couple of very quick questions. One, are we about to give the Russians a six-month notification on the ABM Treaty?

SECRETARY POWELL: We will continue having discussions with the Russians with respect to the ABM Treaty and missile defense. What they know is that the President is totally committed to developing a limited missile defense system that does not threaten Russian strategic offensive weapons. And we will continue to discuss that.

But they know that, sooner or later, the testing that we have to do will run into the constraints of the ABM Treaty and when that happens, we have got to get out of the constraints of the ABM Treaty.

QUESTION: Within the next year?

SECRETARY POWELL: The good news -- I don't want to give a specific time, I'll leave that with Mr. Rumsfeld.

The good news out of the meetings last week was that the President gave to the Russians a new strategic offensive number that will reduce our strategic offensive weapons by two-thirds over the level we now have, and about 40 percent below what the START II Treaty called for. And we expect the Russians in the very near future to respond to that with a number that is in that same range of 1,700 to 2,200 or something around that range.

And so the good news is that these two nations, who used to keep 10- 15,000 weapons, strategic weapons, pointed at each other, have now got it down to somewhere under 2,000, with an opportunity to build transparency, build confidence-building measures as to where those weapons are, what they might be available for. And this shows the strength of the new relationship that is developing between the United States and Russia.

QUESTION: Let me try to get a yes or no out of you on this one. There's a report that the Taliban in Kunduz may be ready to surrender. Should we accept that?

SECRETARY POWELL: I can't confirm that. If they're ready to surrender, then one has to let somebody surrender who intends to surrender.

QUESTION: Okay. I think I understand that. (Laughter.) Secretary of State Colin Powell, thank you.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE Office of the Spokesman For Immediate Release November 19, 2001

Interview Of Secretary Of State Colin L. Powell On ABC's "This Week"

November 18, 2001

QUESTION: (In progress) happen next in Afghanistan. And what about Usama bin Laden? A short time ago, Secretary of State Colin Powell joined us to answer those questions and others.

Thanks so much for being here this morning, Mr. Secretary.

SECRETARY POWELL: Good morning, Cokie.

QUESTION: We've heard that the hunt for Usama is getting closer. Is that the case? Are we about to get him?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I think his options are being narrowed. As more and more of the country is released from Taliban domination, he has fewer and fewer places in which to hide. We think he's still in Afghanistan. There aren't many countries around Afghanistan which would welcome him at the moment, or for that matter, any country in the world, with one or two exceptions, that would welcome him.

So I think, as the President has always said, the noose is getting tighter. We're going to get him out of his hole sooner or later, but we'll get him.

QUESTION: We heard David Wright say that he has found evidence in those safe houses of some link to September 11th. They have also seen in those houses evidence of looking at bombs. Do you think Usama has a bomb?

SECRETARY POWELL: I have no reason to believe that he has a nuclear weapon. There's no doubt that he would like to have had one, and I'm sure they were trying to see what they could do to bring the components together to produce one. But based on what I've seen so far, it's most unlikely that he had one or was anywhere near getting one.

QUESTION: Now, Usama is -- the American people see very strongly as a sign that we've won if we get Usama bin Laden. But the news of the past week is sounding like the war is getting won. Is it effectively won?

SECRETARY POWELL: One part of the conflict, I think, is moving along rather well, and that is to get the Taliban regime out of power and to make it much more difficult for the al-Qaida network to function in Afghanistan. We're not going to lose sight of the objective of destroying the al-Qaida organization in Afghanistan and getting Usama bin Laden.

But as the President has said from the very beginning, our campaign is much broader than that. We want to go after al-Qaida wherever it exists in the world. And it is in some 50 countries, and any one of those cells in those 50 countries could be planning a terrorist operation right now during this Ramadan season.

And so we're not going to lose sight of that objective, and we're not going to lose sight of the broader objective that the President put before the American people and put before the world that has brought this coalition together, is that we're going after terrorism around the world.

And so this is the beginning -- a successful beginning, I believe -- of a very long campaign. And we have to be patient, we have to be persistent, and at the end, I'm confident we will prevail under the President's leadership.

QUESTION: I want to come back to that in a minute, but I want to stay in Afghanistan for a couple more minutes.

In terms of what's happening there on the ground in the fighting, there are reports today that there's a CIA paramilitary force in there. Are they -- first of all, is that true? And secondly, what role are they playing?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I don't want to confirm what the CIA does or does not do. Let me just say that they have been doing some rather splendid work with respect to our activities in Afghanistan, working alongside our military forces that are inside in Afghanistan that we've reported on rather extensively.

I think we've got a very fine linkup between our intelligence assets, our military assets, all within the framework of a good political- military strategy. And it's now starting to show rather significant results.

QUESTION: Now, there are those who say that the diplomacy is behind the military action. And you've had the return of a former Afghan leader, Rabbani, coming in, talks about a meeting coming up this coming week, maybe in Europe, of various Afghan factions. Is that going to happen? And what is the significance?

SECRETARY POWELL: We think the diplomacy is catching up with the rapid pace of military operations. United States Ambassador Jim Dobbins, who is our Special Envoy to the region, and to work with the Northern Alliance, had a meeting this morning in Tashkent with the Foreign Minister of the Northern Alliance, Mr. Abdullah.

And Mr. Abdullah has agreed on behalf of the Northern Alliance to send Northern Alliance representatives to a meeting that's being convened by Mr. Brahimi, the Secretary General of the United Nations' representative on these matters.

Now, where that meeting will be held is still being debated. And the purpose of that meeting is to bring together the factions as quickly as possible so that as quickly as possible we can create an interim government that can go in and begin to take administrative control in Kabul, and then over a longer period of time, you create a more comprehensive, broad-based government.

QUESTION: And while that --

SECRETARY POWELL: So things are now starting to move on the diplomatic front rather well.

QUESTION: And while that interim government is in place, does that require peacekeepers on the ground, including US peacekeepers?

SECRETARY POWELL: It may well require some military presence on the ground, if that seems to be appropriate, both in order to bring in humanitarian supplies, or for the purpose of just providing a level of stability in the towns that are being liberated.

And I think we'll have to make a judgment on each of those places as we go forward. In Mazar-e-Sharif, coalition forces are coming in. That's the town in the north that was the first one that was liberated. And they have come in, really, to help with the delivery of humanitarian supplies and provide more security in that region so that the nongovernmental workers and human rights workers and humanitarian workers and UN workers can get in to deliver food.

QUESTION: One of the extraordinary things that happened over this weekend was the First Lady giving the radio address and talking about the women of Afghanistan. And you have issued a State Department white paper on that subject which says -- and we're going to put it up here -- "The Afghan people want, and the US Government supports, a broad- based representative government which includes women in post-Taliban Afghanistan."

Does that mean the United States says to Afghanistan, you must include women in your government?

SECRETARY POWELL: We will say to the Afghan leaders that if you truly want a representative government that will be respected in the eyes of the world and that reflects the aspirations of all the Afghan people, you have to include women in this political structure.

Now, this, I think, can be done. There are Afghan women who are more than able to contribute to such a government. And we're not going to dictate what they do with their government. It has to come out of the Afghan people.

But we hope they will realize, having gotten rid of the Taliban, having gotten rid of these deprivations and these degradations that they were putting on women and against women, it is now time to allow women to participate more fully in Afghan society, and that includes the political structure of a future Afghan government.

QUESTION: Now, there are those who say this is all part of a propaganda ploy -- and you do have a new office of public diplomacy -- but there are those who say no propaganda will work unless the Middle East, Palestinian-Israeli situation is solved.

You're making a major speech tomorrow. You're expected to talk about this issue. We hear that you're going to say that -- you're going to waive the seven days of no violence before the Mitchell Plan goes into effect. Is that the case?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, the two are not that directly linked. Usama bin Laden tried to steal the Palestinian issue, but he failed, and Chairman Arafat said clearly he wants no part of bin Laden and considers him an outcast.

QUESTION: What about the --

SECRETARY POWELL: With respect to the Middle East, I will be making a speech tomorrow. I will lay out a vision that the United States has, and I believe the international community has, for settlement --

QUESTION: And will you waive the seven days?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'll get to that. I didn't impose the seven days, so therefore I can't waive it. We'll have to see how Mr. Sharon reacts to my speech and what other actions he might take.

What Mr. Sharon has said -- and he was the one who said he needed seven days of quiet before he would be in a position to participate in discussions with the Palestinian side -- Mr. Sharon is determined to bring the violence down. He was brought into office on the basis of security for the Israeli people.

And so we are in a delicate situation right now, and I hope that my statement tomorrow will lay out what the United States believes, our vision, a comprehensive statement of our vision. No new plans are coming. We have a plan. It's a plan that works, the Mitchell Plan. And what we have to do is to get the two sides talking to each other, security officials to security officials, in order to get a cease-fire in place.

With that cease-fire in place, lots of things happen quickly, leading to negotiations.

QUESTION: Now, does that mean no conditions for going to the Mitchell Plan?

SECRETARY POWELL: The United States is not in a position to impose upon either of the two sides specific conditions. We can encourage them. Israel is a democratic nation, freely elected leaders, that makes their judgment. We can encourage, we can prod both sides, and Mr. Arafat, as the leader of the Palestinian Authority.

We do encourage and prod both sides to move both of them in a direction where we can get the violence down, confidence built back up between them, trust restored, so that we can start into the Mitchell Plan and get to negotiations, which is the sole purpose of the Mitchell Plan.

QUESTION: But Mr. Secretary you've been saying that since the first interview we had here in February.

SECRETARY POWELL: And I'm sorry, it hasn't changed since the first interview I gave in February. The violence has continued. It's time to bring an end to the violence. And until that violence is ended, we're not going to get forward movement into the Mitchell Plan.

QUESTION: Thank you. Thank you so much for being with us, Secretary Powell.

SECRETARY POWELL: Thank you, Cokie.

# # #


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>

ALSO:

Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>

ALSO:


Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>

ALSO:

Mexico: Violence And Repression Of Teachers

The member organizations of Network for Peace express our indignation over the acts of repression that the Mexican State has carried out, through the police forces... In Chiapas, Guerrero and Oaxaca, the conflict has resulted in murders of teachers and civilians as well as hundreds of wounded and dozens of people arrested. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Britain's Pleas For Mercy

So… Boris Johnson is promising that he won't be holding a snap general election, if he's chosen as the next UK Conservative Party leader. Reportedly, he is even making that promise a feature of his leadership campaign, since a vote for Boris would therefore mean (wink wink) that his colleagues wouldn't have to risk their jobs and face the wrath of the British public until 2020. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news