World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 

Egypt: Fifty-one convicted in unfair trial

Egypt: Fifty-one convicted in unfair trial


* News Release Issued by the International Secretariat of Amnesty International *

10 September 2002 MDE 12/028/2002

Amnesty International is seriously concerned about the conviction of fifty-one alleged members of an armed Islamist group in an unfair trial before Egypt's Supreme Military Court on 9 September.

The accused were sentenced to between two and fifteen years' imprisonment on various charges, including possession of arms and membership of an illegal organization which has been referred to as Tanzim al-Wa'd (Organization of Promise).

"This trial of civilians before the Supreme Military Court violates fundamental international fair trial standards, including the right to appeal to a higher court and the right to be tried before an independent and impartial tribunal," Amnesty International said.

Dozens of the accused -- including Magdi Hassan Idris Muhammad, and 'Omar 'Abd al-'Aziz Khalifa 'Omar Hagayif Mahdi, who were all sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment -- reported before the prosecution that they were subjected to torture, including electric shocks, by members of the State Security Intelligence. Several of them claimed that they had been coerced into making confessions.

Amnesty International has, on several occasions, called on the authorities to investigate these torture allegations thoroughly and impartially, but has received no response.

Many of the defendants were detained in May 2001. Defendants included several foreign national, including Russian citizens from the Republic of Dagestan. In October 2001, ninety-four defendants were referred for trial before Egypt's Supreme Military Court. Fourty-three of them were acquitted.

Amnesty International calls on President Mubarak not to ratify this verdict and to ensure that the accused will be guaranteed a fair trial in accordance with international standards.

Background In October 1992 President Hosni Mubarak began issuing special decrees referring civilians charged with offences related to "terrorism" for trial in military courts. Proceedings before these courts violate some of the most fundamental requirements of international human rights law, including the right to be tried before an independent and impartial tribunal and the right to appeal to a higher court.

Verdicts by military courts are subject only to review by the Military Appeals Bureau, a body composed of military judges, which is not a court, and ratification by the President. Article 14 (5) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which Egypt has ratified stipulates: "Everyone convicted of a crime shall have the right to his conviction and sentence being reviewed by a higher tribunal according to law."

Egypt's military judges are serving military officers appointed by the Ministry of Defence for a two-year term, which can be renewed for additional two-year terms at the discretion of the Minster of Defence. This does not provide sufficient guarantees of independence of the judiciary as required by international law, including the Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary.

In July 1993 the UN Human Rights Committee expressed deep concern about military courts trying civilians in Egypt, concluding that "military courts should not have the faculty to try cases which do not refer to offences committed by members of the armed forces in the course of their duties." In 1994, the Committee against Torture has also expressed concern about "the existence in Egypt of ... military courts whose functioning would suggest that they are subordinate to the head of the executive branch."

According to Article 15 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, statements obtained as a result of torture should not be used as evidence against the person subjected to torture in any proceedings.

*********************

You may repost this message onto other sources provided the main text is not altered in any way and both the header crediting Amnesty International and this footer remain intact.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
World Headlines

 

Swing States: Gordon Campbell On Why The US Needs MMP

After the bizarre events this week in Helsinki, the world will be hoping and praying that the US midterm elections in November can put a restraining brake on the presidency of Donald Trump. This may happen, but there’s a highly undemocratic reason why such hopes may be frustrated. More>>

ALSO:

putin, trump scalpGordon Campbell: On The White House Romance With Russia

Tough on Europe over trade, at the G-7. Tough on Europe over defence, at NATO. And utterly smitten as usual by Vladimir Putin at the Helsinki summit. More>>

ALSO:


Gordon Campbell: On This Week’s NATO Debacle

For someone routinely cast as a clown presiding over an administration in chaos, Donald Trump has been very consistent about his agenda, and remarkably successful in achieving it, in the short term at least. More>>

ALSO:

NZ Law Society: Rule Of Law Threatened In Nauru

“The recently enacted Administration of Justice Act 2018 is another clear sign of the deterioration of civil rights in Nauru,” the Law Society’s Rule of Law Committee convenor Austin Forbes QC says. More>>

ALSO:

'Fixing' Family Separation: Executive Order Imprisons Families Indefinitely

Amnesty: President Trump signed an executive order today mandating for children to stay with their parents in detention while their asylum claims are processed. More>>

ALSO: