World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search


Wolfowitz Interview with New York Times

NEWS TRANSCRIPT from the United States Department of Defense

DoD News Briefing Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz Saturday, May 3, 2003

(Interview with Doug Jehl, New York Times. Kevin Kellems, OASD(PA) also participated.)

Wolfowitz: (Inaudible) The State Department Future of Iraq Project was a major source of these people. In fact, when we were initially trying to make contact with Iraqi-Americans, that I think virtually all the people we met in the first go-round were from that project.

Kellems: And the IFD itself, which was the host organization, I think I referred you to them before, I mean, the beauty of that as a host organization for that town hall, from which a lot of this flowed, was that they dont back any candidate nor any ideology and its right there in their by-laws. Theyre for two things: getting rid of Saddam, and establishing democracy. Period. End of story. In fact, they dont allow political involvement. And so the purity of that as a starting point, first of all was a rare find, and secondly the fact that these folks, the leadership and core people who formed the core then of the IRDC, were all veterans, or most of them were veterans of the Future of Iraq Project. So it was a nice inter-departmental starting point as well.

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Kellems: I dont like the secretive part, because we havent been secretive in any way, shape or form. So you can drop that second part of it. I mean, for example, I dont know if youve looked at our website, but

Wolfowitz: There are four different interviews that

Kellems: We did 60 Minutes II, Foreign Press Center briefing, LBC, Al Arabiya, BBC. Thats a small fraction. There were dozens, if not hundreds, of interviews done. In fact, I used it as sort of a major way to get the word out about IRDC and a way of putting an Iraqi face on the whole process.

Jehl: (Inauduble)

Wolfowitz: I think the question sort of answers itself. I mean, its an enormously valuable asset to have people who share our values, understand what were about as a country in most cases actually are citizens of this country but who also speak the language, understand the culture, know their way around that country. I mean, Id be amazed or rather a bit unhappy if the U.S. government didnt take advantage of a resource like that.

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Wolfowitz: That is simply absurd. I mean, what theyre saying is they share our values, so we shouldnt be dealing with them. I mean, we have all kinds of Americans working for us there, and it is particularly valuable to have Americans who know their way around that country and can interpret that country for us. And the fact that they share our values, I would have thought would have been a clear point in their favor. I mean, frankly, it is very puzzling why there should be so many questions about the role of Iraqi-Americans as opposed to non-Iraqi-Americans. They obviously bring something important to us.

One of our challenges in that country is going to be figuring out which of the people whove been there all along are people that we can deal with, and were going to need lots of sources of information. But the implication of the question is that, you know, maybe we should go to the CIA instead of Iraqi-Americans. Were going to look for information from wherever we can get it.

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Wolfowitz: Among the people whove been there, who are the people that we can really trust and work with, and who are people who represent the values of the old order?

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Kellems: Well, Im not sure that were done with this topic yet. I mean, I dont

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Wolfowitz: Before we leave the other subject, I mean, I hope its clear if its not clear, it should be made clear that these people are not going to play a political role in Iraq. Theyre going to help give us technical advice and liaison with the people who are going to have to administer ministries for us, and in fact precisely if these folks want to be participants in the Iraqi political process, then they have to terminate their connection with IRDC. There are a couple who went to the Nasiriyah meeting who did exactly that. Is that clear?

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Wolfowitz: Well look, I mean, Im sorry, thats not unique to Iraqi-Americans. Were going to have to figure out which of the values that are important to us really are requirements for a free and democratic Iraq and which are issues that Iraqis need to decide for themselves, and there are going to be a lot of people giving advice at the end of the day. There are going to be decisions made and, if theyre U.S. government positions, theyll be made by the appropriate U.S. government officials. And if theyre Iraqi decisions, theyll be made by people who are not on our payroll and not working for us and who are part of the political process. I dont know the gentleman you referred to, but it sounds like he expects to be an advisor to the senior American who is playing a role in that particular ministry, and I mean, I certainly wouldnt want to discriminate against someone who holds those views.

Kellems: It sounds to me like the people who are feeding you this are inflating purposefully or out of misunderstanding the role, the seniority, that these people have, as a way to try to undercut or whip up fear and misinformation.

Wolfowitz: There does seem to be an agenda at work, Doug.

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Kellems: No, there are no senior. No senior. These are teams.

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Kellems: I dont understand there to be a formal structure where there is a Okay, go ahead. Im taking up too much of your air time.

Jehl: (Inaudible)

Wolfowitz: Theyre advisory roles, and no one persons opinion is in any way a decisive opinion, and I mean, we are nominating a whole bunch of senior advisors, none of whom one might say unfortunately are Iraqi-American. I dont know whether thats good or bad. As it turns out, none of them I dont even think theres an Arab-American among them. Theyre mostly State Department ambassadors. Theyre playing a senior advisory role in the ministries. Theyre going to be a filter for any advice of the kind you describe. I hope they wont filter out democratic advice; thats certainly not their job. And they themselves are advisors and, insofar as the U.S. government has a position on anything as fundamental as whether or not we take a position on the role of religion in a future Iraqi government, I can assure you thats going to be way above even those senior advisors level. So, theres a fear mongering at work here thats very counterproductive.

[Web Version:]


© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Rohingya Muslims Massacred: Restrictions On Aid Put 1000s At Risk

Amnesty: The Myanmar authorities’ restrictions on international aid in Rakhine state is putting tens of thousands of lives at risk in a region where mainly Rohingya people are already suffering horrific abuses from a disproportionate military campaign. More>>


Werewolf: Gordon Campbell On North Korea, Neo-Nazism, And Milo

With a bit of luck the planet won’t be devastated by nuclear war in the next few days. US President Donald Trump will have begun to fixate on some other way to gratify his self-esteem – maybe by invading Venezuela or starting a war with Iran. More>>


Victory Declared: New Stabilisation Funding From NZ As Mosul Is Retaken

New Zealand has congratulated the Iraqi government on the successful liberation of Mosul from ISIS after a long and hard-fought campaign. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Current US Moves Against North Korea

If Martians visited early last week, they’d probably be scratching their heads as to why North Korea was being treated as a potential trigger for global conflict... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The Lessons From Corbyn’s Campaign

Leaving partisan politics aside – and ignoring Jeremy Corbyn’s sensational election campaign for a moment – it has to be said that Britain is now really up shit creek... More>>