World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 

Venezuelan Electoral Authorities Deny Expat Voting

Email: coha@coha.org Website: http://www.coha.org/
Council On Hemispheric Affairs
Monitoring Political, Economic and Diplomatic Issues Affecting the Western Hemisphere
Memorandum to the Press 03.70

Tuesday, November 18, 2003

Venezuelan Electoral Authorities Deny Expatriates Their Voting Rights, a Set-Back to Venezuelan Democracy

On Friday, November 14, Venezuela’s independent National Electoral Council (CNE) decided that Venezuelan citizens living abroad could not participate in a petition calling for a referendum on President Hugo Chávez’s continued rule.

The opposition-backed petitioning drive, known to Venezuelans as the “reafirmazo,” will take place from November 28-December 1 of this year. The CNE, a non-partisan body, is in charge of monitoring the entire process.

An estimated 300,000 Venezuelans live outside their country and the country’s Chávez-authored current constitution grants them the right to participate in electoral processes such as the referendum and the “reafirmazo.” Nevertheless, the CNE has exercised its rights and has refused to make arrangements for these potential voters to exercise theirs, on the grounds that it was technically impossible to monitor the petition drive abroad.

In Venezuela, the CNE has managed to train 2,842 volunteers to monitor the “reafirmazo.” It will also set up a call center and provide cell-phones for monitors across the country to report developments and results. Over the past month, representatives of Venezuelan political and civil society groups abroad offered to assist the Venezuelan government to set up a monitoring mechanism in the country’s consulates abroad, but the CNE’s decision rules out that possibility.

Decisions in the CNE are made by a board of five rectors, three of whom voted against holding the “reafirmazo” abroad. Several solutions to the issue were proposed earlier last week. Rector Jorge Rodriguez for example, said that only 26,555 petition forms should have been sent abroad, because that is the number of Venezuelans who have registered as voters in their consulates.

Rector Sobelia Mejias, who voted against the CNE’s final decision, demanded that the electoral body facilitate the participation of all Venezuelans abroad, on the grounds that most Venezuelans in foreign residences are registered voters, but in their hometown’s, not their consulate’s registry. In an October 21 proclamation, Supreme Court Justice Antonio Garcia stated that any Venezuelan who is registered on the electoral record (regardless of place) should be allowed to participate in national electoral activities.

The CNE’s ultimate decision can be considered to be a significant setback for Venezuelan democracy, even if it deserves being seen as giving a boost to Chávez, because most Venezuelans living abroad can be assumed to be anti-Chavistas. It could be argued that Venezuela’s institutions should have striven to overcome all technical obstacles in order to guarantee the right of all of the country’s citizens to participate in the “reafirmazo”, or any other national electoral process sanctioned by the country’s organic law. Sadly, one must conclude that it was not so much the lack of a technical capacity but rather of political will which has denied the Venezuelan diaspora’s right to exercise their franchise.

This analysis was prepared by Manuel Rueda, COHA Research Fellow.

Issued 18 November 2003

The Council on Hemispheric Affairs, founded in 1975, is an independent, non-profit, non-partisan, tax-exempt research and information organization. It has been described on the Senate floor as being “one of the nation’s most respected bodies of scholars and policy makers.” For more information, please see our web page at www.coha.org; or contact our Washington offices by phone (202) 216-9261, fax (202) 223-6035, or email coha@coha.org.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
World Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: Is This Guy The World’s Most Dangerous Thirtysomething?

Saudi Arabia has long been regarded as a pillar of stability in the Middle East, and is the essential caterer to the West’s fossil fuel needs. It is also the country that gave us Osama Bin Laden, al Qaeda, and 15 of the 19 terrorists who carried out the 9/11 attacks... More>>

ALSO:

Non-Binding Postal Vote: Australia Says Yes To Same Sex Marriage

Binoy Kampmark: Out of 150 federal seats, 133 registered affirmative totals in returning their response to the question “Should the law be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry?”. More>>

ALSO:

Bonn Climate Change Conference: Protecting Health In Small Island States

The vision is that, by 2030, all Small Island Developing States will have health systems that are resilient to climate change and countries around the world will be reducing their carbon emissions both to protect the most vulnerable from climate risks and deliver large health benefits in carbon-emitting countries. More>>

ALSO:

Camp Shut Down: Refugees Must Be Rescued From Manus

On 31st October 2017, the detention centre on Manus Island in which the Australian Government has been holding more than 700 refugees was closed, leaving those living there in a desperate situation. More>>

ALSO:

EARLIER:

Rohingya Muslims Massacred: Restrictions On Aid Put 1000s At Risk

Amnesty: The Myanmar authorities’ restrictions on international aid in Rakhine state is putting tens of thousands of lives at risk in a region where mainly Rohingya people are already suffering horrific abuses from a disproportionate military campaign. More>>

ALSO:

 
 
 
 
 
 
  • Pacific.Scoop
  • Cafe Pacific
  • PMC