World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search


Maryland Voters Suit Against Unauditable Elections

April 21, 2004


Lawsuit Would Require Upgraded Security Measures and a Voter-Verified Paper Audit Trail for November 2004 Election

WASHINGTON, D.C. - A cross-partisan group of registered Maryland voters announced today they have filed a lawsuit against the Maryland State Board of Elections and its Administrator, charging that the new Diebold AccuVote-TS electronic voting machines recently purchased by Maryland fail to comply with both state and federal law. The lawsuit -- to be filed Wednesday in Anne Arundel County Circuit Court -- would force state election officials to decertify the electronic machines until the manufacturer, Ohio-based Diebold Election Systems, remedies well-publicized security vulnerabilities in the new machines and institutes a voter-verified paper audit trail.

Maryland is at the epicenter of a nationwide controversy regarding the use of electronic voting systems. "States throughout the country are demanding increased security measures and a paper audit trail after having reviewed reports that were commissioned by Maryland to evaluate these machines," said plaintiff Linda Schade, Co-founder of the Campaign for Verifiable Voting in Maryland. "The Maryland State Board's refusal to implement the recommendations of its own reports is irresponsible and contrary to both federal and state law."

Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include concerned Maryland voters, city council candidates, sitting city councilmen, a founder of a statewide citizens network, and the Minority Whip of the Maryland State Senate.

Maryland's election law provides that the State Board cannot certify voting systems unless it determines that the system is secure, reliable, and "capable of providing an audit trail of all ballots cast so that, in a recount, the election can be reconstructed, starting with the individual votes of all eligible voters." Maryland law also requires the State Board to decertify a system if the system "no longer protects the security of the voting process."

"The security concerns with the Diebold machines are well-known and very real," said Paul Suh, a security specialist for the Campaign for Verifiable Voting in Maryland. "If we don't get them up to election law standards before the November 2004 general election, Maryland will be voting on flawed systems with serious security vulnerabilities and no capability for a recount. Maryland could become the Florida of the 2004 election."

Plaintiffs are represented by attorneys from the Washington, D.C. office of Kirkland & Ellis LLP and the Baltimore, MD office of Tydings and Rosenberg LLP.

To view the Complaint, go to:

© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Ramzy Baroud: Year in Review Will 2018 Usher in a New Palestinian Strategy

2017 will be remembered as the year that the so-called ‘peace process’, at least in its American formulation, has ended. And with its demise, a political framework that has served as the foundation for US foreign policy in the Middle East has also collapsed. More>>


North Korea: NZ Denounces Missile Test

Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters has denounced North Korea’s latest ballistic missile test. The test, which took place this morning, is North Korea’s third test flight of an inter-continental ballistic missile. More>>


Campbell On: the US demonising of Iran

Satan may not exist, but the Evil One has always been a handy tool for priests and politicians alike.

Currently, Iran is the latest bogey conjured up by Washington to (a) justify its foreign policy interventions and (b) distract attention from its foreign policy failures.

Once upon a time, the Soviet Union was the nightmare threat for the entire Cold War era – and since then the US has cast the Taliban, al Qaeda, and Islamic State in the same demonic role. Iran is now the latest example…More

Catalan Independence:
Pro-independence parties appear to have a narrow majority. More>>