World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


Powell IV With Egyptian Television and Nile News

Interview With Mohamed Elsetouhi of Egyptian Television and Nile News

Secretary Colin L. Powell
Washington, DC
October 29, 2004

(10:35 a.m. EDT)

Note: To be released 1:00 p.m.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary, for another opportunity, a third one, actually.

SECRETARY POWELL: My pleasure to see you again.

MR. ELSETOUHI: It's our pleasure, sir. And as you know now, President Arafat is in Paris to seek treatment. What's your assessment of the situation? How serious you think it is?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I don't know. He is being attended by a number of doctors, and I am pleased that he is now in a sophisticated medical facility where his health condition can be more carefully assessed. And I trust he will get the treatment that he needs. But I have no independent knowledge with respect to his medical condition.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Okay, how about the political condition? People are wondering how things would look like without Yasser Arafat.

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I'm not prepared to speculate because he is still alive, Chairman Arafat, and he certainly was expressing to the people who were with him that he was looking forward to returning.

So I don't think it's wise for any of us now to put out hypotheticals as to what would happen after Chairman Arafat leaves, because he is still alive and receiving medical treatment, and that's what I think we all should focus on. But I'm not going to speculate on the post-Arafat period if there is one in the near future.

MR. ELSETOUHI: But you've been asking him for a while to step aside. Actually, Dr. Rice just did that a couple of weeks ago, so. So do you see this possibility now, that he is that sick?

SECRETARY POWELL: I don't want to speculate on what the outcome of his health situation will be. We have said, for a long period of time, that we believe the Palestinian people would be better off with an empowered prime minister who has political authority and who has control of the security forces. And that individual, so empowered, would give the Israelis a partner for negotiations, and would give the Quartet a partner for negotiations.

But in that scenario, as Dr. Rice has said and as I have said on many occasions, we would assume that Chairman Arafat would assume a different kind of position within the Palestinian community. This is an entirely different matter now than when we were talking about his health.

So I don't think it is useful for us to speculate about his health and I think it is best to stay with our position that we have stayed with for -- had for a long time, that suggests that we have been seeking an empowered prime minister with political authority and control of the security forces so that the Palestinian Authority can get ready to assume responsibility for Gaza when those settlements are removed and be prepared to participate in the roadmap deliberations that will follow, as four settlements in the West Bank are removed. That still remains our goal.

MR. ELSETOUHI: But are you concerned at all about the possibility of power struggle within the Palestinian Authority?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm not going to discuss what might happen should the worst happen with Chairman Arafat. Chairman Arafat is ill. He is getting the medical attention that he needs, and I'm pleased that he is in a sophisticated medical facility where he can get the care that he needs.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Okay. The Israeli Knesset just approved the disengagement plan, and many Palestinians feel that Mr. Sharon will use the withdrawal from Gaza to strengthen Israel's hold over the West Bank and east Jerusalem. What do you think about that?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, I've heard this concern expressed, but in the understanding that we have with Prime Minister Sharon that was announced by Prime Minister Sharon and President Bush in April, this is part of the roadmap process, to bring out the settlements in Gaza, start with four settlements in the West Bank, and get into the roadmap where both sides, the Palestinian side and the Israeli side, will negotiate further reduction of settlements in the West Bank and resolve all final status issues between the two of them, not the United States resolving them, but only the two parties negotiating with each other.

I think that even though this might have started out as a unilateral action on the part of the Israeli Government, it now holds the possibility of Palestinians getting control over all of Gaza, with no Israeli settlements, and using this as a way to enter into final status discussions with the Israelis.

So rather than argue what the original motives might have been or might still be on the part of the Israelis, it is an opportunity that I think the Palestinians should seize, by bringing control over security forces, reducing the number of forces, making sure that they are trained and equipped, and making sure that the Palestinian Authority is ready to provide political control over Gaza and security control over Gaza, working with the Egyptians and others, when these settlements are removed.

The settlements are going to be removed. For years and years and years, people have said, we want settlement activity ended and we want settlements to be removed. Well, here's an opportunity. It should be grabbed. Settlements are being removed. And one can debate the motives, whether it was a unilateral action to reinforce their position in the West Bank or really it is the beginning of the roadmap process, whatever motive one wants to attribute to this, I think it is an opportunity that should be grabbed by the Palestinian Authority.

The U.S. position is that what Mr. Sharon is doing and what he is now pushing through his government is part of the overall roadmap process, and it is an opportunity that the Palestinian Authority and the international community should use to further progress toward final status discussions.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Well, people have plenty of reasons to doubt Mr. Sharon's commitment to the roadmap. Even his advisor has said that the withdrawal will be an opportunity to freeze the peace process.

So this is a real possibility that they are taking this withdrawal to get out of the roadmap and stop this peace process.

SECRETARY POWELL: Prime Minister Sharon himself has stepped up, spoken out on this subject, after some of his advisors had spoken on it, and said he's committed to the roadmap. And the President knows what Prime Minister Sharon said to him in April when they made their announcement with respect to the Gaza disengagement.

And so one can debate it and argue it, but it is there as an opportunity. Everybody has wanted settlements to be gone. They're going to be gone, 21 in the West -- in Gaza, and then four initially in the West Bank.

So why not just take that and work with it?

MR. ELSETOUHI: But they are also expanding in the West Bank. They are building the so-called "natural growth," and even the United States is getting mixed messages and signals on this.

SECRETARY POWELL: We are concerned about the continued settlement activity, but that doesn't --

MR. ELSETOUHI: Natural growth?

SECRETARY POWELL: We are concerned about all kinds of settlement activity, to include different definitions of what growth is. And we're working with the Israelis to define what a settlement is and what the difference is between natural growth and expansion, and is natural growth something that is consistent with the Israelis' commitments to us.

But all of that is-- should not be looked at as an obstacle or a reason not to seize the opportunity of actual settlements being removed. We can argue about natural growth, but let's not take the position that we don't want to see settlements come out of Gaza because we're concerned about natural growth in the West Bank. Let's get started. Let's work to make sure that the transition from 21 settlements in Gaza to no settlements in Gaza is handled in an efficient way so that the Palestinian Authority can have full political and security control over Gaza, working with Egyptians and other members of the international community, and then work on the four settlements in the West Bank as a start, and grab this opportunity while we work on many more difficult issues having to do with settlement growth, natural growth, investment in settlements, the wall that gives us concerns -- all of the other issues that have to be dealt with.

These issues don't go away if you don't have disengagement in Gaza, so let's get disengagement in Gaza, use it as an opportunity to deal with all these other questions and issues.

MR. ELSETOUHI: But, as you know, time is not on our side here, and here and many Palestinians fear that with the Israeli expansion of settlements that maybe the two-state solution is not going to be feasible anymore, that they are thinking now more and more about the one-state solution.

SECRETARY POWELL: But while they're worrying about these issues, and they are legitimate issues in the mind of Palestinians and Palestinian leaders and we want to pursue all of these issues, this should not be a reason to be against the Gaza disengagement. I can't quite get the logic that says they may be doing this, they may be doing that in the West Bank; therefore, we shouldn't be supportive of or get ready for the disengagement that's going to take place in Gaza. Disengagement is going to take place in Gaza, and I believe that it would be in the best interest of the Palestinian people and the Palestinian Authority to prepare for that disengagement, make it a smooth one, make sure they're ready to handle the politics of it, political control, security control, security forces, and then use that as an opportunity to get into the roadmap because the Israelis said that all of this is going to be done consistent with the roadmap. So accept that and let's move on with it.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Okay, moving to the Iraqi problem, what do you expect from this coming meeting in Sharm el-Sheikh?

SECRETARY POWELL: I think in Sharm el-Sheikh we will have an opportunity for Iraq to sit with all of its neighbors and with members of the G-8 and other nations and organizations that will be invited so that Prime Minister Allawi can lay out his goals, can lay out the concerns he has about the neighbors' activities, and we can have a good discussion. People have wanted to have regional and larger conferences so that the international community can be more involved in what's happening in Iraq, and this is an opportunity to do that, and we look forward to this meeting.

MR. ELSETOUHI: What do you expect from Egypt and other neighbors?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, support for the Iraqi Interim Government, support for the process of moving forward to elections in January of 2005, condemnation of the insurgent action and the terrorist action that each day is killing not just coalition forces, but killing Iraqis. These are people left over from a tyrannical, dictatorial regime, and they should not be found to be acceptable actions by anybody. And so we would hope at the conference in Sharm el-Sheikh there will be an acknowledgement that the Iraqi Interim Government is deserving of the support of its neighbors and the international community so they can move toward elections in January.

MR. ELSETOUHI: But Dr. Osama el-Baz was quoted as saying we will be defining the resistance in Iraq. Is there any sort of legitimate resistance, so to speak, in Iraq?

SECRETARY POWELL: They are resisting the Interim Government that has been put in place with the support of the United Nations Security Council, a Security Council resolution. It is a transitional government, not the final government. It's a transitional government that takes the Iraqi people to elections in January of 2005.

Increasingly, security is being handled by police and military forces of this new Interim Government. The coalition is supporting that Interim Government until it's able to handle all of its own security needs and until it gets an elected government, and then the coalition wants to withdraw.

So who are these insurgents attacking? What legitimacy can they have? Attacking the Interim Government that enjoys the benefit of the UN resolution? Blowing up policemen who are standing in line to join the police force or blowing up policemen who are doing their work, doing their jobs, murdering 50 Iraqi soldiers in execution style who have just finished training and are heading home to some leave, and after leave they're going to take up their responsibilities to protect their country, and they are laid out on the ground and murdered with a bullet in the head? Can there be any justification? No, there can't be any justification. We must not speak in terms of justifying this kind of barbarous activity.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Senator Kerry, I believe in his first debate with President Bush, talked about building 14 military bases in Iraq. Is it-- is this what's going on now?

SECRETARY POWELL: The Bush Administration is not building 14 permanent military bases in Iraq.

MR. ELSETOUHI: So it's not true, then?

SECRETARY POWELL: You'll have to ask Mr. Kerry, not me. We are not building permanent -- 14 permanent military bases in Iraq. Our goal is to assist the Iraqi people to have elections, to write a constitution, to put in place a fully legitimate government that rests on that constitution and rests on an election, and then to bring our troops out.

Now, we have friendly relations with so many nations around the world where there is some U.S. military presence, but the suggestion that somehow the United States wants to continue to occupy Iraq for some indefinite period of time, and therefore, we are building bases so that we can continue to be an occupying nation, this is absurd. This is not the American tradition. It is not the pattern of our behavior in other nations with which we have alliances and friendships. Everywhere we have been elsewhere in the world, whether it's Germany or Korea or Japan, and we have facilities there, it is at the invitation of the legitimate government, it is at the invitation of the people of that country as expressed through their government.

MR. ELSETOUHI: There have been reports that the United States is thinking about imposing more sanctions on Syria. Is this at least --

SECRETARY POWELL: We are forever reviewing Syrian behavior. We have responsibilities under the Syrian Accountability Act. But at the moment I have no recommendations from my staff, but we continue to monitor the situation.

MR. ELSETOUHI: The United States is selling bunker-busting weapons to Israel, and is it, in a way, supporting Israel in a possible attack on Iran's nuclear facilities?

SECRETARY POWELL: We are providing Israel the weaponry it needs to defend itself. We are not participating in any contingency planning that has to do with any facilities in Iran or anywhere else.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Bunker-busting weapons against what, sir?

SECRETARY POWELL: Well, you know, bunker-busting weapons, I mean, it's essentially a large bomb that can penetrate something. And I'm not sure what's being -- whether that is being sold or not. You'll have to ask my colleagues at the Defense Department.

But the heart of your question is: Are we working with Israel on some contingency plan with respect to Iran? And the answer to that question is no.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Okay, my last question, Mr. Secretary. As you know, in a divided state like Washington, we know only one thing, that you are leaving in January. Do you accept -- you know, you accept this question? And I do accept your answer that "I serve at the President's pleasure."

SECRETARY POWELL: Right.

MR. ELSETOUHI: But, what is the situation on this?

SECRETARY POWELL: I serve at the President's pleasure. And the city is not divided. I have been giving this answer to both sides of the city, and it is one answer. And I serve at the pleasure of the President and that's the only answer I can give.

MR. ELSETOUHI: And how is his pleasure these days?

SECRETARY POWELL: His pleasure is very well. We're looking forward to a fascinating Election Day next Tuesday and I'm confident the President will have another four years.

MR. ELSETOUHI: How do you see your legacy as Secretary of State after four years?

SECRETARY POWELL: I've worked very hard on issues of peace and freedom and democracy. We've removed a dictatorial regime in Kabul; we removed a dictatorial regime in Baghdad. The people of Afghanistan are now voting for their own democratic leadership. The people of Iraq should have that same opportunity.

We have increased the development assistance that we provide to nations in the world that are in need, that are coming along. We have increased our funding of HIV/AIDS programs around the world. We have enhanced our relationship with the major powers of the world, Russia and China and India and Pakistan; we have helped them to a rapprochement.

We have tried to work through now, and I think we will be successful, the difficulties that we encountered last year as a result of the Iraq war. We are now working with the French and the Germans, working with NATO to assist Iraq to train people.

We have increased our efforts on opening up free trade in your part of the world. We have good relations with most of the nations in the broader Middle East and North Africa area. We have a new initiative, A Forum for the Future, where we will help the nations of the broader Middle East and North Africa move toward reform and modernization at a pace they choose and in a way that they choose.

We stand ready with the roadmap and the Quartet to assist the parties in the Middle East to achieve a solution to the Middle East peace problem that has been such a problem for so long a period of time, and the roadmap is alive and well and ready. We need enhanced leadership in the prime minister's office on the Palestinian Authority side, and the President remains very much engaged and anxious to move forward toward peace in the Middle East.

So we have done a lot over the last four years and a lot of it, I think, has been quite successful with respect to fostering peace, partnership and democracy throughout the world. I don't think the President or the Administration gets enough credit for what we have done with respect to our development assistance programs and what we have done with respect to providing the basis for stability in Asia and other parts of the world.

We are also working very hard in Africa. We helped Liberia free itself last year. We are working on peacekeeping efforts throughout the region. We have been in the forefront of efforts to help the people of Sudan.

And so I think it's been an active foreign policy that has had many successes and many programs in place that will be even more successful during the President's next term.

MR. ELSETOUHI: Thank you very much, Mr. Secretary.

SECRETARY POWELL: You're welcome.

2004/1178

[End]


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>

ALSO:

Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>

ALSO:


Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>

ALSO:

Mexico: Violence And Repression Of Teachers

The member organizations of Network for Peace express our indignation over the acts of repression that the Mexican State has carried out, through the police forces... In Chiapas, Guerrero and Oaxaca, the conflict has resulted in murders of teachers and civilians as well as hundreds of wounded and dozens of people arrested. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Britain's Pleas For Mercy

So… Boris Johnson is promising that he won't be holding a snap general election, if he's chosen as the next UK Conservative Party leader. Reportedly, he is even making that promise a feature of his leadership campaign, since a vote for Boris would therefore mean (wink wink) that his colleagues wouldn't have to risk their jobs and face the wrath of the British public until 2020. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news