World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


US Proposal for Darfur Flawed; ICC Referral Needed

U.N. Rights Chief Details Crimes in Darfur

U.S. Proposal for Darfur Tribunal Flawed; ICC Referral Needed

(New York, February 16, 2005) – The top U.N. human rights official will brief the Security Council today on atrocities in Darfur. Following Louise Arbour’s report, the Security Council should take prompt action to protect civilians and refer Darfur to the International Criminal Court, Human Rights Watch said.

Arbour, who serves as the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, will present the report of a U.N. Commission of Inquiry for Darfur, which found that grave crimes committed in Darfur “may be no less serious and heinous than genocide.” The commission strongly recommended the Security Council refer the situation in Darfur to the International Criminal Court (ICC) to hold those most responsible to account.

“The people of Darfur continue to suffer horrendous abuses fueled by ongoing impunity for crimes against humanity,” said Richard Dicker, director of the International Justice Program at Human Rights Watch. “The Bush administration’s intransigence on the International Criminal Court is only delaying justice for the people of Darfur.”

In September, Washington sponsored the resolution that created the U.N. Commission of Inquiry for Darfur. But now, the United States is ignoring the commission’s findings that the ICC is the “single best mechanism” and “only credible way” to ensure justice is done. Instead, the Bush administration has proposed a new ad hoc tribunal for Darfur.

“The U.S. proposal to create a new tribunal for Darfur is a mirage of a solution,” said Dicker. “A new, ad hoc court would lack the speed and staying power to get the job done.”

The U.S. government claims that this new tribunal could begin operating quickly because it would share infrastructure with the Rwanda tribunal in Arusha, Tanzania.

However, an official at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda said on February 10 that it is already challenged by efforts to increase courtroom capacity and schedule new trials while handling the eight trials already in progress. The tribunal’s press release noted that a fourth courtroom is currently under construction to ensure even more steady progress in completing cases for Rwanda. A new tribunal for Darfur would thus have to be built effectively from scratch.

“To complete its existing docket on schedule, the Rwanda tribunal will have to use every resource it has,” said Dicker. “The U.S. plan to graft a new tribunal on the Rwanda court’s facilities is like squeezing three more passengers into an already overstuffed car.”

A key problem with the U.S. proposal is that, as a temporary court, it would be necessarily time-limited. That would make it easier for fugitives or an uncooperative Sudanese government to run out the court’s clock.

The U.S. government has also attempted to pass off its proposed court in Arusha as an “African court,” while dismissing the ICC as a “European” tribunal. This public relations ploy ignores the many strong ties between members of the African Union and the ICC.

African governments played an active role in establishing the court, and half of the African Union members have already ratified the ICC treaty. Additionally, as the principal funder of any new tribunal for Darfur, Washington would control the purse strings, which would raise questions about the court’s legitimacy.

Moreover, the ICC treaty permits the court to sit outside its headquarters in The Hague. This would allow the ICC to conduct hearings in Africa.

Human Rights Watch has prepared a backgrounder detailing why the U.S. proposal would fail to effectively handle the challenges of ensuring justice for atrocities committed in Darfur. Excerpts from the U.N. Commission of Inquiry’s report also discuss why mechanisms other than the ICC are not advisable.


© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>

ALSO:

Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>

ALSO:


Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>

ALSO:

Mexico: Violence And Repression Of Teachers

The member organizations of Network for Peace express our indignation over the acts of repression that the Mexican State has carried out, through the police forces... In Chiapas, Guerrero and Oaxaca, the conflict has resulted in murders of teachers and civilians as well as hundreds of wounded and dozens of people arrested. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Britain's Pleas For Mercy

So… Boris Johnson is promising that he won't be holding a snap general election, if he's chosen as the next UK Conservative Party leader. Reportedly, he is even making that promise a feature of his leadership campaign, since a vote for Boris would therefore mean (wink wink) that his colleagues wouldn't have to risk their jobs and face the wrath of the British public until 2020. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news