World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


Jordan: Why the US impunity agreement is illegal


Jordan: Why the US impunity agreement is illegal

This week the Jordanian Senate decided to support the ratification of an agreement with the USA granting US nationals impunity for crimes under international law, including, genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. In doing so, members contended that the agreement is consistent with the International Criminal Court's Statute.

Only two weeks earlier, the Chamber of Deputies rejected the agreement as incompatible with Jordan's obligations under international law, a decision which Amnesty International publicly welcomed. As a result of the disagreement the two bodies will now seek to resolve the issue. It is essential that the Senate joins the Chamber of Deputies in rejecting the illegal agreement.

The Senate's claim that the agreement is consistent with the ICC's Statute and international law is seriously flawed. Jordan, as a state party to the Rome Statute, the Genocide Convention, the Geneva Conventions, the Convention against Torture and under other international law, is under an obligation to bring those suspected of crimes under international law to justice. Ratifying an agreement committing Jordan to exempt the nationals of one country from justice is an obvious and serious violation of these obligations.

The agreement Jordan has signed goes significantly further than refusing to surrender US nationals to the International Criminal Court. It is designed to provide absolute impunity for US nationals from all courts, including, Jordanian courts. In particular, the USA has steadfastly refused to include any guarantee in the agreements signed with other states that the US will investigate and prosecute persons accused of crimes who are returned to the USA and it does not define crimes against humanity and certain other crimes as crimes under US law. In the event that the USA does nothing, there is no requirement that it must re-extradite the person to Jordan for prosecution or to surrender them to the International Criminal Court.

The result could include that Jordan would be unable to investigate and prosecute US nationals accused of crimes committed on Jordan's territory or against Jordanian nationals.

The Senate is wrong to argue that there is provision for such agreements in the ICC's Statute. Article 98 of the ICC's Statute relates to status of forces agreements (SOFAs) existing at the time the Statute was created. SOFAs allocate jurisdiction between two states – they do not seek to exclude jurisdiction altogether as this agreement does.

It is for these reasons that many states and the EU, which has issued a legal memorandum confirming the unlawfulness of impunity agreements, have refused to enter into such agreements with the USA. Jordan which has been among the strongest supporters of the International Criminal Court, must join other states in upholding the new system of international justice.

In supporting the agreement, the Senate has stated that it would serve "Jordan's higher interests". On the contrary, it would undermine the rule of law and preserve a system of impunity that has contributed to the killing and suffering of millions of people in the Middle East and other regions of the world over the last half century. Surely, Jordan's higher interest is to work towards confining these crimes to the past.

View all AI documents on Jordan: http://amnesty-news.c.topica.com/maadPzOabjeOfbb0hPub/

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

At The UN: Paris Climate Agreement Moves Closer To Entry Into Force

The Paris Agreement on climate change moved closer toward entering into force in 2016 as 31 more countries joined the agreement today at a special event hosted by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>

ALSO:

Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news