World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search


HR Orgs Seek Change To IOF Gaza Shelling Policies

16 April 2006
Press Release

Israeli and Palestinian human rights organizations petition the High Court:
Reducing "Safety Zone" in Shelling of Gaza Strip is Manifestly Illegal Order

The order given to Israeli forces to aim shells only 100 meters from houses of residents injures civilians and subjects Israeli army officers and soldiers to war crimes charges

Today, six Israeli and Palestinian human rights organizations petitioned the High Court, demanding that Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz and Chief of Staff Dan Halutz revoke the order recently given to soldiers that reduces the safety zone of shells fired into the Gaza Strip to only 100 meters from civilians, civilians' houses, or any other civilian object. Previously, the safety zone had been 300 meters. Last week, the order resulted in the loss of life. In light of the substantial risk of further civilian casualties that may occur before the order is revoked, an urgent hearing on the petition is requested, if possible, as early as tomorrow (Monday, 17 April). The petitioners, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights in Gaza, Btselem, Gaza Community Mental Health Programme, Association for Civil Rights in Israel, and the Public Committee against Torture in Israel, are represented by attorney Micha'el Sfard.

The order given to reduce the safety zone was revealed last week by Ha'aretz's military correspondent, Amos Harel, and was not denied by the Israeli Army. The article quoted a "senior official" who expressly confirmed that the Israeli Army was aware that the reduction endangers civilian lives. The organizations argue that, given that the shell fragmentation range is 100 meters in any case, and that the weaponry is not precise and shells can land dozens of meters from the target, reduction of the safety zone substantially endangers civilian lives, buildings, and other civilian objects located near the target. Last week, shelling into the reduced range caused the death of 7-year-old Hadeel Ghaban from Beit Lahiya, when a shell landed inside her house. The blast wounded 12 members of her family, among them her pregnant mother and her small brothers. Dozens of shells landed dozens of meters, and in some cases only a few meters, from houses. The organizations emphasize that the shelling is not a defensive measure, directed at the source of Qassam rocket fire at the time the rockets are launched at Israel, but shelling into "the Qassam launching spaces," broad areas from which – it is estimated – Qassam rockets had previously been fired. Thus, the attack is Israeli army initiated, intending to punish and/or deter, and not as self-defense.

The organizations argue that reducing the safety zone gravely breaches fundamental principles of the laws of war, and that the order is manifestly illegal to the point that Israeli soldiers should not obey them. In carrying out the order, Israeli army officers and soldiers risk being charged with war crimes and with legal measures that may be taken against them by international judicial bodies. The order flagrantly breaches at least three fundamental principles of international humanitarian law: the requirement to distinguish between combatants and civilians, the principle of proportionality in the use of force, and the requirement to use caution in carrying out attacks. Attorney Sfard argues that, in reducing the safety zone, the Israeli Army is playing Russian roulette with the lives of Gaza's civilians, by knowingly placing civilian homes within the area in which the shells will fall, and whether civilians, including whole families, will be injured depends on variables over which the army has no control.


© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>


Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>


Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>


Mexico: Violence And Repression Of Teachers

The member organizations of Network for Peace express our indignation over the acts of repression that the Mexican State has carried out, through the police forces... In Chiapas, Guerrero and Oaxaca, the conflict has resulted in murders of teachers and civilians as well as hundreds of wounded and dozens of people arrested. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On Britain's Pleas For Mercy

So… Boris Johnson is promising that he won't be holding a snap general election, if he's chosen as the next UK Conservative Party leader. Reportedly, he is even making that promise a feature of his leadership campaign, since a vote for Boris would therefore mean (wink wink) that his colleagues wouldn't have to risk their jobs and face the wrath of the British public until 2020. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news