World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


Condoleezza Rice IV On Fox's The O'Reilly Factor

Interview With Bill O'Reilly of The O'Reilly Factor


Secretary Condoleezza Rice
Washington, DC
August 1, 2006


QUESTION: Joining us from Washington, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Very nice to have you on the program this evening, Madame Secretary. I'm going to start right off with our reporters at Fox tell us the ground war is underway in southern Lebanon. What do you know about it and what do you think is going to happen there?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, clearly in southern Lebanon there's been a situation in which a terrorist group, Hezbollah, decided to launch an attack from Lebanese territory without the knowledge of the Lebanese Government against Israel. Israel then exercised its right to defend itself.

We think it's very important that after these events are over that we will not have a return to the status quo ante, and so the United States is working for a ceasefire, for an end to the hostilities that will not allow a return to the status quo ante. And if we don't work for a ceasefire that will be lasting and enduring, then we're going to be right back here in several months talking about another ceasefire.

So we've been laying those political conditions and I think we're making progress, Bill.

QUESTION: (Inaudible) state that cannot do so.

SECRETARY RICE: Well, I think there's a lesson from what is being learned about Hezbollah, and that is that over the last several years they have significantly improved their capabilities, largely because of the forbearance and the largesse of Syria and particularly Iran which has given them much more sophisticated technology. And so yes, they have improved their capabilities.

But ultimately, Hezbollah is going to be defeated through a combination of the desire to make sure that they don't have the military capabilities, but also they're going to be defeated politically. And so we are trying to work to extend the authority of the Lebanese Government, to extend the authority of the Lebanese armed forces throughout Lebanon, and we're making progress. I think during my trip I saw a Lebanese Government that is prepared to take its responsibilities and an Israeli Government that will be prepared also to have a partner.

QUESTION: So what you're telling me -- and correct me if I'm wrong, as I so often am -- is you were caught by surprise, the United States was caught by surprise, Israel was caught by surprise, didn't know Hezbollah had all those rockets aimed at the Israeli cities and that there is going to be a substantial ground campaign to eliminate the threat from those missiles. Am I taking anything wrong here? Am I making a mistake?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, I'm not going to try to account for what the Israelis will do in their military operations. We don't plan military operations with the Israelis. We don't -- what we do with the Israelis is to talk with them about the situation, how to end this violence in a way that does not permit Hezbollah to claim victory, that does not permit a return to the status quo ante. But I don't know whether the Israelis fully understood the extent of the Hezbollah capabilities. I can't say. I do know that those capabilities were quite extensive and it points right to the insolence of Iran in this region.

QUESTION: But Madame Secretary, up to 9/11 and after the Iraq, you know, occupation, it troubles me as an American citizen. I didn't know Hezbollah had 15,000 rockets in southern Lebanon. And we had the Israeli Ambassador on last night. He didn't say so, but it looks like Mossad didn't know. It looks like the CIA didn't know. You had 2,000 UN peacekeepers there for two years trying to enforce 1559. They didn't -- either they didn't know or they didn't say anything. Doesn't that trouble you that all of this armament was built up?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, I'm not going to try to get into the intelligence. You know that, Bill. I'm not going to try to get into the intelligence. But of course it's troubling, the capabilities that Hezbollah has. But if you think about how these terrorist organizations operate, they burrow in with the population, they hide their capabilities inside of villages. They're very hard to detect.

But we do know that this is more than just Hezbollah in Lebanon. This is an extension of Iranian power through a proxy war.

QUESTION: Sure, and Syria too.

SECRETARY RICE: And Syria as well, yes.

QUESTION: Is Hezbollah using women and children as human shields?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, I would not be at all surprised because, of course, terrorist organizations like nothing better than to expose or to use civilian populations to shield their activities, so I wouldn't be at all surprised.

QUESTION: You haven't made a determination on that after Qana?

SECRETARY RICE: No, we've not. And as you know, the Israelis have said that they will investigate that very, very tragic circumstance. And let's recognize, Bill, that that was a terribly tragic circumstance.

QUESTION: Well, everybody knows that.

SECRETARY RICE: It was tragic for the Lebanese people. It was tragic for the world. But the fact is, unfortunately, these terrorist organizations are very much bred into these villages and it's very hard to root them out.

QUESTION: Now, you know that most of the world, at least the world press, including in our own country, is now saying that Israel is overly aggressive and the United States is wrong for backing Israel. The Los Angeles Times has shifted their position. They're now saying that it's too much. The New York Times, it's too much. The Boston Globe, it's too much. And around the world you see the demonstrations.

So again, the United States' image is taking a beating here. What do you have to say about that?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, of course, the United States has to do what it thinks is right, and President Bush is always going to do what he thinks is right. Now, we do think that the violence should end. We think it should end, of course, on a basis that is not going to create a situation in which we're right back here again several months from now or several years from now. The Middle East is littered with ceasefires that didn't work, and so we have to work this time to try and change the circumstances on the ground, change the political circumstances, extend the authority of the Lebanese armed forces south. We can have an end to the violence. We need to have an end to the violence. But we also have to be certain that we're pointing in the right direction politically.

QUESTION: All right. We'll take a quick break. When we come back, I'm going to ask you about a peacekeeping force that's being bantered around, and then the French Foreign Minister also said some very controversial things. And later, is the American press covering the Middle East crisis in a fair way? Bernie Goldberg and Jane Hall with analysis upcoming.

(Commercial break.)

QUESTION: Continuing now with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. You know French Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy, right?

SECRETARY RICE: Right. I do.

QUESTION: Is he your pal? Do you know him well?

SECRETARY RICE: Oh, he is. I know him well. We work well together. Yes.

QUESTION: All right. Now, today he said, "Iran is a key player in the Middle East and is a stabilizer," plays a stabilizing role. Now, for those of us who don't know Mr. Blazy and think France is ridiculous, this sounds crazy. Your reaction?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, Iran is not a stabilizing force in the Middle East.

QUESTION: So Philippe is misguided?

SECRETARY RICE: I don't know the context of the statement. I'll just tell you Iran is not a stabilizing force in the region. It's one of the most destabilizing forces in a long, long time in the Middle East.

QUESTION: All right. So here's the context. He met with Foreign Minister Fawzi Salloukh from Lebanon. You know him.

SECRETARY RICE: Yes. Yes, I do.

QUESTION: And then they came out and said all kinds of great things about Iran. You know, with allies like France, who needs Hezbollah? You know? See, what I'm not getting -- and you've known me for a long time, you know I'm pretty dense, I'm not the smartest guy in the world, all right? What I'm not getting is I see Hezbollah attack Israel. My viewers see it unprovoked, killing eight Israeli soldiers, going in, kidnapping two. Didn't have to happen. There's no real reason for it to happen. We understand that Iran and Syria transferred all these missiles that are going to kill civilians to Hezbollah.

I see it. You see it. We all see it. But France thinks it didn't happen and the rest of the world is blaming Israel and the USA. Can you explain that to me in just terms that I can understand?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, Bill, I've actually found more of a consensus than you might think about what started this. If you go back to the statement that the leaders had at G-8, it was very clear where people put the blame for what happened here.

QUESTION: But not now. They've turned -- since Qana they've turned against Israel. Oh, Israel is overreacting. You know that. Come on.

SECRETARY RICE: Well, I do think that sometimes the very, very tragic pictures and the toll in human lives has an effect on people. But I think we have to acknowledge that the important thing is to keep clear about what your strategic goals are.

QUESTION: Okay.

SECRETARY RICE: And Iran is a very, very bad factor in the international system.

QUESTION: But our French allies don't seem to see it that way and it's extremely troubling because unless you get a world consensus you're never going to win the war on terror; you're never going to defeat Islamafascism.

SECRETARY RICE: Well, Bill, but let me just make a point here. Of course, we just yesterday passed a Security Council resolution on Iran in which France has been one of the major sponsors.

QUESTION: Yeah, but then Iran said they're not going to obey it. Again, blank you. That's what they basically said.

SECRETARY RICE: Well, but -- well, and when the Iranians get past this August 31 deadline, I think they're going to see sanctions from the international system that are going to start to make life pretty miserable.

QUESTION: What about a peacekeeping force? Is that going to be in southern Lebanon? Do you support that? U.S. troops going to be in there?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, I don't think there's any anticipation, expectation of U.S. combat forces on the ground, for a lot of reasons. But I do think that we are looking at an international force. It will likely be a force that would go in sometime after a ceasefire. I think they can't go in under fire. Nobody expects that. But it's going to be an important element of making sure that the Lebanese can deploy their forces to the south.

QUESTION: Right. It'll protect the Lebanese who can't stand up against Hezbollah. So you think that peacekeeping force is going to happen under the auspice of the United Nations?

SECRETARY RICE: I do think it will happen. I think after the Rome conference one of the things that was really missed about the Rome conference, everybody talked about the immediate ceasefire calls, but what really the Rome conference did was to say that the international community believes there needs to be an international force that can help Lebanon extend its authority and can thereby get rid of that vacuum into which Hezbollah has flown.

QUESTION: Okay. Well, last question. And we really appreciate you taking time, Madame Secretary.

Richard Armitage, who was the Deputy Secretary of State before you guys took over, he said that you should talk directly to the Syrians and that you made a mistake not talking to the Syrians. Your reply?

SECRETARY RICE: Well, you know, Rich Armitage was one of the last U.S. administration officials to talk to the Syrians and they didn't react very well or, in fact, react at all to what he said. And it was a very strong message that Syria had to make a strategic choice. We're still waiting for Syria to make that strategic choice.

The problem isn't that people don't talk to the Syrians; it's that the Syrians don't act. And so I think we are very clear with the Syrians what needs to be done and hopefully one day the Syrians are going to do it.

QUESTION: Do you think France thinks they're a stabilizer, too?

SECRETARY RICE: I know that there are a lot of problems with Syria and France. There's no doubt about that.

QUESTION: All right, Madame Secretary. Good luck to you and we appreciate you coming on the program. You're welcome anytime and we all hope that this situation winds down. Thank you very much.

SECRETARY RICE: Thank you, Bill.

2006/728

Released on August 1, 2006

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

At The UN: Paris Climate Agreement Moves Closer To Entry Into Force

The Paris Agreement on climate change moved closer toward entering into force in 2016 as 31 more countries joined the agreement today at a special event hosted by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. More>>

ALSO:

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On The End Game In Spain (And Other World News)

The coverage of international news seems almost entirely dependent on a random selection of whatever some overseas news agency happens to be carrying overnight... Here are a few interesting international stories that have largely flown beneath the radar this past week. More>>

Amnesty/Human Rights Watch: Appalling Abuse, Neglect Of Refugees On Nauru

Refugees and asylum seekers on Nauru, most of whom have been held there for three years, routinely face neglect by health workers and other service providers who have been hired by the Australian government, as well as frequent unpunished assaults by local Nauruans. More>>

ALSO:

Other Australian Detention

Gordon Campbell: On The Censorship Havoc In South Africa’s State Broadcaster

Demands have included an order to staff that there should be no further negative news about the country’s President Jacob Zuma, and SABC camera operators responsible for choosing camera angles that have allegedly made the President ‘look shorter’ were to be retrained... More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On A Bad Week For Malcolm Turnbull, And The Queen

Malcolm Turnbull’s immediate goal – mere survival – is still within his grasp... In every other respect though, this election has been a total disaster for the Liberals. More>>

ALSO:

Gordon Campbell: On Bidding Bye Bye To Boris

Boris Johnson’s exit from the contest for Conservative Party leadership supports the conspiracy theory that he never really expected the “Leave” option to win the referendum – and he has no intention now of picking up the poisoned chalice that managing the outcome will entail... More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news