World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search


A Vote Against Common Sense

A Vote Against Common Sense


Thursday, January 24, 2013

ISRAELIS voted on Tuesday to kill the prospect of peace. Out of 34 factions contesting election, voters chose right wing parties advocating land annexation and "Jewish-only" settlements.

This should come as no surprise as an opinion poll conducted by Israel Democracy and Tel Aviv University last month revealed that 67 per cent of Israelis supported their government's policies on the stalled peace process.

For the first time in history, peace was not in the top two issues in the latest Israeli election.

In fact, public opinion surveys carried out over the last year showed that the majority of Israelis preferred the status quo over rigorous efforts to achieve peace with the Palestinians.

Having had a de facto peace for the last 10 years, Israelis have reason to aspire to something else in the "hierarchy of human needs".

Other than their extra-judicial assassinations and a "starvation diet" imposed on Gazans, Israelis have enjoyed genuine peace.

At the same time, governments from all political spectrums have persisted in championing the building of "Jewish-only" settlements, intending to prejudge the outcome of negotiation.

In the Tel Aviv University polling, prospective Israeli voters were asked who was best to handle socio-economic issues.

Forty-five per cent believed it was Labour party leader Shelly Yachimovich, while 36pc backed Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu.

Playing to deep-seated Israeli racism and copying George W Bush's second term, "external threat" strategy, Netanyahu succeeded in muddling voters' priorities - so that overblown fear triumphed over reason.

Despite concern over the economy, Israelis voted for the less qualified candidate to lead their country.

In a meeting earlier this week with a group of American senators, the Israeli Prime Minister asserted that the "Iranian threat", not Jewish settlement building, was a threat to world peace.

Likewise, more than 20 years ago Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir told then President George Bush that dealing with Iraq took precedence over peace with the Palestinians.

A decade from now, another Israeli leader will likely conjure up another distant threat to avoid dealing with its occupation of Palestine.

Sadly, the international community continues to ignore the fact that these fictitious, remote enemies exist only as a direct result of Israeli occupation and injustice inflicted on the people of Palestine.

Understanding these palpable facts, world leaders - while remaining powerless - have privately expressed frustration with Israeli policies undermining the peace process.

In 2011, then French President Nicolas Sarkozy was overheard telling President Barack Obama that Netanyahu was a "liar".

In the same year German Chancellor Angela Merkel rebuked the Israeli Prime Minister, saying "how dare you" when he called to complain about Germany's vote at the United Nations Security Council.

Recently, US President Barack Obama was quoted as saying in a private conversation: "Israel doesn't know what its own best interest are [sic]."

Even former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert, in an interview with Israel's Channel 7 last Thursday, said the current Israeli government was disinterested in peace or reaching a resolution with the Palestinian people.

Israel will continue to be led by a Prime Minister who bragged in 2001 of his intention "to put an end" to the peace process.

Since his election in 2009, Netanyahu's policies of building illegal settlements have made the prospects of a viable Palestinian state very unlikely.

The leaders of the newly-recognised state of Palestine face new challenges.

Should they allow Israel to eviscerate the meaning of UN recognition, or force their agenda before indifferent world powers?

Protesting against illegal land theft should not be limited to boycotting negotiations and oral condemnations.

In the absence of a viable, independent Palestinian state, a single-state option should become part of a new strategy.

Israelis want to continue their occupation and have peace. They can't have it both ways.

*Jamal Kanj ( writes frequently on Arab issues and is the author of Children of Catastrophe, Journey from a Palestinian Refugee Camp to America. A version of this article was first published by the Gulf Daily News newspaper


© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Werewolf: America, The Gated

How, in a global metropolis like New York, do you write about immigration as a problem to be solved? And yet immigration is a hot button issue among those fighting to break away from the unruly clump of starters in the race for Republican nominee. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: US Bomb Strikes Hospital In Kunduz

According to US military sources, “there may have been collateral damage” to the medical facility. “This incident is under investigation.” A statement issued by the office of the President Ashraf Ghani said that Army General John Campbell, chief of US-led forces in Afghanistan, apologised. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: The Fall Of Tony Abbott

The question was one of timing. The Coalition had been registering losses in poll after poll. The Abbott style hardly improved after a spill was forced on the party. Despite claiming that he would be ushering in a spring clean, he continued bypassing ministers and MPs... More>>



Pacific.Scoop: Smaller Pacific States Call For Coal Moratorium

PNG Loop: Leaders of the Pacific Smaller Island States have called on all nations – especially the advanced economies in the region – to rise to the challenge of climate change. They want to steer the world on a path where climate change is no longer a threat to earth. More>>


Get More From Scoop

Search Scoop  
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news