World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search


Five Australian universities break global top ten

Five Australian universities break global top ten in QS World University Rankings by Subject

London 8th May: Five of Australia’s leading universities make the global top ten in at least one of the 30 disciplines covered in QS World University Rankings by Subject, released today on

University of Melbourne leads the way, making the global top ten in six subjects: education (3rd), law (5th), linguistics (6th), psychology (7th), accounting and finance (7th) and medicine (9th).

ANU attains top-ten rankings in politics and international studies (6th), history (7th), geography (8th=), linguistic ( 9th) and philosophy (10th). The University of Queensland ranks 7th in agriculture and forestry, 9th in both environmental sciences and psychology, and 10th in education. The University of Sydney highest ranking positions are in education (6th) accounting and finance (9th) and Law 10th). Monash University makes the top ten in education (6th) and pharmacy and pharmacology (7th=).

Melbourne ranks top nationally in 15 subjects while ANU ranks top in nine. University of Queensland and University of Sydney both claim two spots and Monash University and University of New South Wales (UNSW) are top in one subject apiece, pharmacy and material science respectively. A total of 35 Australian institutions make the global top 200 in at least one discipline.

The rankings are based on surveys of some 70,000 academics and graduate employers, alongside research citations and a new ‘H-Index’ measuring research impact.

Over 46,000 academics identified the leading institutions for research within their field and region of expertise, while employers identified the institutions that have produced outstanding graduates in a given discipline area.

“These rankings provide the most comprehensive global comparison of universities yet at individual subject level,” says QS head of research Ben Sowter. “The world-class performance of several Australian institutions reflects their high-impact research and outstanding reputation among an industry-leading sample of global academic experts and graduate employers.”

Globally, Harvard University ranks number one in 10 disciplines, ahead of MIT (7), University of California, Berkeley (4), Oxford (4), Cambridge (3), Imperial (1) and University of California, Davis (1).

The rankings feature several notable performances from Asian universities, particularly in the hotly contested areas of science and technology.

Nine of the top 20 institutions in civil engineering are Asian, led by Japan’s University of Tokyo (3rd) and Kyoto University (7th). Traditionally the two dominant forces in international rankings, the US and UK account for just five of the top 20.

“The shift in global economic power is transforming the international higher education landscape, with countries such as Australia, Japan, Hong Kong and Singapore emerging as genuine challengers to the traditional elite,” says Sowter. “Many institutions in Europe are struggling to keep pace in technical disciplines, in which financial resources are particularly crucial.”

Top-ranked institutions in the world

Institution No.1 rankings Subjects
Harvard University 10 Psychology, politics, pharmacy,
medicine, law, education, economics,
earth/marine sciences, biology, accounting
MIT 7 Physics, materials science, mechanical
engineering, electrical engineering, chemical
engineering, computer science, chemistry,
UC, Berkeley 4 Statistics, sociology, environmental
sciences, communications
University of Oxford 4 Philosophy, modern languages,
geography, English language and literature
University of Cambridge 3 Mathematics, linguistics, history
Imperial College London 1 Civil engineering
UC, Davis 1 Agriculture
© QS Quacquarelli Symonds 2004-2013 Disclaimer

QS World University Rankings by Subject offer new level of detail for students

This year’s revamped QS World University Rankings by Subject have been expanded to cover a record 30 disciplines, offering students the most detailed comparison of the world’s top universities at individual discipline level. This year our research citations indicator has been supplemented with a new ‘H-Index’, measuring research productivity and impact. The two measures in tandem help us to more accurately account for both the quality and quantity of a university’s research output in a given field.

Competition at the top
Across the 30 disciplines the number one spots are distributed among large US and UK institutions that operate primarily in English: Harvard (10), MIT (7), UC Berkeley (4), Oxford (4), Cambridge (3), Imperial College London (1) and UC Davis (1). The 30 individual tables are not intended to combine to form an overall ranking, and indeed there is more than one way to interpret which university comes out on top if we attempt to do so. While Harvard claims more top spots than any other institution, the university that appears in the top ten in most disciplines is University of Cambridge, with 27, ahead of Oxford and Berkeley on 23, with Stanford (22) and Harvard (21). Cambridge’s near-blanket presence in the top ten indicates that, perhaps more than any other institution, it can claim to be world-class in nearly every major area of academic research. Yet Harvard and MIT have more departments that are truly world’s leading.

The view from employers
While US institutions remain preeminent for research, the rankings suggest that graduates from the UK’s two most famous institutions are more highly regarded than their Ivy League rivals by the world’s employers. Employers regard Cambridge graduates as the world’s best in 13 of the 30 subjects, while Oxford ties with Harvard on seven, ahead of London School of Economics, University of Tokyo and UC Davis, top in one subject each. The US/UK monopoly extends to nearly two-thirds of the elite positions – 397 of the 600 top-20 spots across the 30 disciplines. Yet there is plenty of evidence in these rankings of world-class departments outside of this traditional power cluster.
Asia excels in engineering

The rankings feature several notable performances from Asian universities, particularly in the hotly contested areas of science, engineering and technology. Nine of the top 20 institutions in civil engineering are Asian, led by Japan’s University of Tokyo (3rd) and Kyoto University (7th), Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University (8=) and National University of Singapore (11), alongside three universities from Hong Kong and two from mainland China. The US and UK account for just five of the top 20.

The pace of change is demonstrated by the rapid development of young Asian tech-focused institutions. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Nanyang Technological University have been in existence for just over 20 years, yet are now established in the global top 20 in several engineering and technical disciplines.

Mixed results for the BRIC nations
While Australia, Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan emerge as global players in several disciplines, the world’s major emerging economies see more mixed fortunes.

The rankings are positive for China, whose ambitious schemes to improve higher education standards in the last 20 years have yet to see its universities break the top 20 in the overall QS World university Rankings. Here however, there are Chinese universities in the top 20 in ten disciplines, with Tsinghua University ranking tenth in materials sciences and eleventh in statistics.

Brazil’s efforts to improve its research output have been less high profile, yet its universities have been steadily improving their international standing in recent years. Universidade de Sao Paulo in particular performs well here, ranking among the top 50 universities in the world in four disciplines. Brazil’s total of 19 top-200 universities in at least one of the 30 subjects compares to eight from Chile, five from Argentina, four from Mexico and two from Colombia.

Yet there are less encouraging signs from the remaining two BRIC nations, India and Russia. The Indian Institutes of Technology perform reasonably well in their specialist areas, with the IIT Bombay, IIT Delhi and IIT Madras all making the top 50 in at least one of the engineering disciplines. Yet there are 11 subjects in which not a single Indian institution makes the top 200.
Russian institutions feature in just eight of the 30 disciplines. The best performance comes from Lomonosov Moscow State University, which makes the top 50 in mathematics, a subject in which Russia has historically produced numerous world leaders.

France and Germany feel the squeeze
France and Germany have both introduced ‘excel
lence initiatives’ to improve the performance of their top universities, and both can point to positive performances in some areas. Germany has five top-50 institutions for mechanical engineering, led by Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen [17], and an impressive five institutions in the top 35 for physics – only the US can claim more. France can also point to top-20 performances from three of its universities: Université Paris-Sorbonne (Paris IV) ranks 14th for modern languages, Sciences Po Paris is 16th for politics and international studies, and Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne ranks 18th for law and 19th for history. Yet the rankings also reveal areas in which both France and Germany are trailing in the wake of intensified global competition. Germany has no top-50 institutions in important areas such as mathematics and economics, while there are no French institutions in the top 50 in computer science or any of the four areas of engineering: chemical, civil, electrical and mechanical. The increased competition that is squeezing some European institutions out of the global elite is coming not only from Asia, but also increasingly Australia. Australian universities make the global top 20 in 25 of the 30 disciplines.

© Scoop Media

World Headlines


Le Pen Beaten: English Congratulates Macron On French Election Win

Prime Minister Bill English has this morning congratulated Emmanuel Macron on his victory in the French presidential election. More>>


Gordon Campbell: On The French Election Result

Macron is shaping as the third major test case, after Bill Clinton, after Tony Blair – on whether the aim of ‘progressive social policy’ and realities of ‘neo-liberal economic settings’ can be made to credibly co-exist within the same sentence, let alone within the decrees from the Elysee Palace. More>>

Werewolf: The Maverick On Moloka’i

Monday, April 17 was Moloka’i’s turn for some face-to-face time with Tulsi Gabbard, who is part Samoan and part haole (pakeha), a practising Hindu, and a Middle East combat veteran. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Snap Election In Britain

The election call is entirely opportunistic and self-serving and will – regardless of the outcome – put Britain in a worse negotiating position for managing its Brexit. More>>

Turkey: Observers Say Erdogan’s Constitutional Referendum Flawed

Lack of equal opportunities, one-sided media coverage and limitations on fundamental freedoms created unlevel playing field in Turkey’s constitutional referendum, international observers say. More>>


Westminster: NZ PM Condemns London Attack

“London is a place many thousands of New Zealanders have visited and called home, and where many more have friends and family based, so this attack feels very close to home,” Mr English says. More>>