World Video | Defence | Foreign Affairs | Natural Events | Trade | NZ in World News | NZ National News Video | NZ Regional News | Search

 


War Crimes Committed by Hamas: the use of Human Shields

War Crimes Committed by Hamas: the use of Human Shields

21 July 2014

I. The Principle of Distinction

A core principle of the law of armed conflict is the 'principle of distinction' - the obligation imposed on each party to the conflict to ensure at all times that a distinction is made between combatants and civilians. This principle is reflected in Article 48 to the Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions:

In order to ensure respect for and protection of the civilian population and civilian objects, the Parties to the conflict shall at all times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants and between civilian objects and military objectives and accordingly shall direct their operations only against military objectives.

This principle which is widely accepted worldwide requires parties to a conflict to ensure the protection of civilians on both sides. Accordingly, a party to the conflict is prohibited from using its own civilians as shields. As the Secretary General's report on the 1993 attack on UN forces in Somalia noted:
No principle is more central to the humanitarian law of war than the obligation to respect the distinction between combatants and non-combatants. That principle is violated and criminal responsibility thereby incurred when organizations deliberately target civilians or when they use civilians as shields or otherwise demonstrate a wanton indifference to the protection of non-combatants.[1]

II. War Crimes Committed by Hamas

Hamas, a terrorist organization which is designated as such by many states including the United States and the European Union, has ascribed to an ongoing strategy of purposefully and blatantly violating the most fundamental principles of the laws of armed conflict including the law of distinction outlined above.

The laws of armed conflict clearly establish that parties to the conflict are prohibited from using civilian population or civilian objects for the purpose of shielding military objectives,

The presence or movements of the civilian population or individual civilians shall not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations, in particular in attempts to shield military objectives from attacks.[2]

In addition the very presence of military objectives in densely populated areas is explicitly prohibited under the rules of law. Such a requirement is set forth in Article 58 of Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions which requires all parties to a conflict to “…avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas”.

In flagrant violation of the laws outlined above Hamas' deliberate placement of military objects (command centers, weaponry including rocket launching pads and the like) in the heart of civilian areas is a serious violation of international law. For over 14 years Hamas has fired rockets from schools and mosques[3]; has used ambulances to transport weapons and terrorists[4]; has commandeered private homes for use as command centers and for carrying out attacks while the resident family is prevented from leaving[5]. In recent days we have seen Hamas efforts to use the civilian population as human shields, as the organization has tried to encourage civilians to ignore IDF advanced warnings of attacks. These are all severe violations of international humanitarian law, which amount to war crimes for which Hamas bears full responsibility.

And as international law expert Yoram Dinstein wrote:

Should civilian casualties ensue from an attempt to shield combatants or a military objective, the ultimate responsibility lies with the belligerent placing innocent civilians at risk. [Emphasis added][6]

To sum up, Hamas thus violates the principle of distinction and the obligation to clearly distinguish itself from its own civilian population and to avoid the use of civilian population as human shields. By doing so, Hamas and the terror organizations in the Gaza Strip are clearly committing war crimes.

[1] The Secretary General report pursuant to paragraph 5 of UN Security Council resolution 837 (1993)
S/1994/653.

[2] Article 51 of Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions.
[3] Under Article 53 of the Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions, "…it is prohibited to use such objects in support of the military effort."
[4] According to Article 12 of the Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions, "Under no circumstances shall medical units be used in an attempt to shield military objectives from attack."
[5] Article 58 of Additional Protocol I of the Geneva Conventions requires all parties to a conflict to “…avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas; take the other necessary precautions to protect the civilian population, individual civilians and civilian objects under their control against the dangers resulting from military operations."
[6] Dinstein, Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 2004 p.131.

Ends.

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
 
 
World Headlines

 

Amnesty: Campaign Mass Hangings And Extermination At Syrian Prison

A chilling new report by Amnesty International exposes the Syrian government’s calculated campaign of extrajudicial executions by mass hangings at Saydnaya Prison. Between 2011 and 2015, every week and often twice a week, groups of up to 50 people ... More>>

Russian Hack Job?: White House - Actions In Response To Russian Malicious Cyber Activity & Harassment

President Obama authorized a number of actions in response to the Russian government’s aggressive harassment of U.S. officials and cyber operations aimed at the U.S. election in 2016. More>>


Israel/Palestine: Michael Field - Background To How Israel Nearly Went To War With New Zealand

New Zealand and Senegal managed to get the United Nations Security Council to pass resolution 2334 which said Israel’s settlements in Palestinian territory violate international law and undermine a two-state solution in Israel's conflict with Palestine. More>>

ALSO:

US Indigenous Affairs: How President Obama Has Protected Our Sacred Land

I am very proud to be both Navajo and American. As the President of the Navajo Nation, I’ve dedicated my life to ensuring that, as a Navajo, my story -- and our stories -- are part of our collective American history. Today, I want to share one of those stories with you. More>>


Binoy Kampmark: The Berlin Truck Attack And The Refugee Question

The hard-nosed neo-cons were certainly showing little interest in linking arguments, examining evidence, or even considering elementary logic in the aftermath of the Berlin truck attack near the Gedächtniskirche. With the bodies fresh in the morgue, former US ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, peered into the mind of the everyday German, and found teeth chattering fear. More>>

Demonetisation: Gordon Campbell On India’s Huge Socio-Economic Experiment

Without much coverage at all in the West, India has just been engaged for the past few weeks in one of the world’s biggest socio-economic experiments since the Cultural Revolution in China. More>>

Gordon Campbell: On The Death Of Fidel Castro

New Zealand likes to think we played our part – via the 1981 Springbok tour – in bringing the apartheid regime in South Africa to an end… Jacob Zuma treated the death of Fidel Castro at the weekend as an occasion to pay a heartfelt tribute to the thousands of Cuban soldiers who travelled across the world to inflict the first significant military defeat on the forces of white supremacy. More>>

ALSO:

Get More From Scoop

 
 
 
 
World
Search Scoop  
 
 
Powered by Vodafone
NZ independent news