

https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1310/S00214/is-windows-81-rt-really-that-bad.htm

Is Windows 8.1 RT really that bad?

Saturday, 26 October 2013, 2:59 pm
Article: Digitl

Most press reviewers and bloggers agree there's little wrong with the Microsoft Surface 2 hardware. Microsoft gets credit for bringing its tablet hardware up to date.

There's a different story with the tablet's software. Scan the news feeds and you'll find Windows RT 8.1 comes in for almost as much criticism as the original Windows RT.

Is this justified?

Windows 8.1 RT is a small update on the operating system that shipped with the original Surface RT tablet. For most of the time it looks and behaves exactly the same as Microsoft's desktop operating system: Windows 8.1.

Windows 8.1 RT perceptions

This is where problems begin, because Windows 8.1 RT can't do all the things that a desktop operating system can. More precisely, it can't run full Windows applications. That means users are locked out of the Windows apps they've used in the past. It also means they no longer have millions to choose from.

You can't run Photoshop or install the Chrome browser as an alternative to Internet Explorer. You can't run some cloud services that have Windows clients.

On the other hand you can run any of the apps in the Windows Store. Some of the traditional Windows apps come in Windows Store versions for RT, but many don't. It would pay to look at the store to check it meets your needs before plonking down cash for Surface 2.

The wrong Windows?

Microsoft has a product for people who want to run Windows apps on a tablet. It's called the Surface Pro 2 - prices start at $1300, roughly twice the price of a Windows RT tablet.

At least part of Windows RT's problem is confusion about the difference between the two product ranges. Given that the OS looks like Windows and acts like Windows, people expect it to do everything full-blown Windows can.

This is essentially a marketing and perception problem for Microsoft. It doesn't help that the flip-side of the logic could be framed as 'you pay less money and get an inferior experience'.

How Apple deals with this

You could ask yourself why Apple doesn't face exactly the same problem. The iPad's operating system is equally limited when compared to the Mac's operating system.

There's a clue in the names. Apple calls its tablet OS iOS, while the desktop OS is called OS X. If Apple had launched iPads with OS X RT, it may have run into similar problems.

Which brings up to an interesting point. How does Windows 8.1 RT compare with iOS 7?

It's certainly a different experience. You may find cast iron reasons why you consider one better than the other, but most of that is a matter of taste and need.

Where Office fits

Windows 8.1 RT comes with plenty of software. There's a version of Microsoft Office which looks and behaves just like the desktop version. Not so long ago, you'd pay more for a single copy of Office than you pay now for a Surface 2 with the software installed.

Office works with Skydrive, so you can work with files on the move, then make changes to the same documents from a desktop computer later. Or on a smartphone. The new version of RT comes with a full copy of Outlook, an important productivity tool for companies committed to Microsoft's technology stack.

Overall Microsoft Windows 8.1 RT works well. I found the touch controls in Windows 8 were clunky and awkward on a desktop, on a 10-inch screen they make perfect sense. Everything is well signposted with big clear buttons to tap and lots of navigation help.

Cognitive leap

There's a cognitive leap you have to make - particularly if you've used other tablets - because many screens are quite minimal. This keeps things tidy and uncluttered. What isn't immediately obvious is that there are screens and menus behind these screens which you get at through swipe gestures from the edge of the display.

Once you grasp this, you'll find Windows 8.1 RT can be as productive as any tablet. Possibly more so. I wouldn't describe it as intuitive. I would say that finding your way around isn't hard.

Multi-tasking is much improved over the original Windows 8 RT. It's now practical to have two windows open at the same time, making it easier for tasks such as cutting and pasting between apps.

Where's the desktop?

Long-time Windows 8 users will notice there's no desktop button on the 8.1 RT start page. That's because you mainly don't need to go there. However, the one aspect of Windows 8.1 RT I dislike most is that the Office apps all work on the desktop. So there's a jarring transition between what was formerly known as the Metro interface and the old-school Windows desktop when you switch to Office.

Personally, I would have been happier if Microsoft had created Metro-style versions of the Office apps. I don't know whether the company chose not to maintain full compatibility with the desktop version or whether Microsoft just hasn't got around to modernising the apps yet. Either way, this discontinuity is annoying.

So to answer my original question, is the media criticism of Windows 8.1 RT justified? We certainly need to stay critical but some of the negativity is overstated.

Work needed on sales and marketing

Microsoft and the people in retail stores selling the Surface 2 could do a better job of managing customer expectations. I heard a sales person, wrongly, tell a customer an earlier RT device had a full copy of Windows. That really doesn't help. More retail training and clearer advertising may help.

The switch to desktop when using Office is not enough to dismiss the OS. For people who don't need powerful desktop apps like Photoshop - let's face it, that means most people - a Surface 2 tablet will be all the computer they need. RT's limitations are not such a big deal for 90 percent of the population.

[digitl 2013]

digitl on Google+