https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL2104/S00103/apple-m1-at-least-a-generation-ahead-of-intel.htm
|
| ||
Apple M1: At least a generation ahead of Intel |
||
Six months have past since Apple launched its first M1 based Macs. This week saw a slew of new Macs and an iPad Pro all using the same processor.
M1 is at least a generation ahead of anything Intel can offer. It is, in effect, an entire system on a chip. There’s no indication the chipmaker will close the gap any time soon. Intel is in trouble.
If you want the best battery performance and
the most powerful everyday processor it’s Apple all the
way.
The M1 is nominally an eight-core processor. In practice it is more complicated. There are four high-performance cores and four low power, high-efficiency cores.
There’s something else going on.
The M1 changes how we think about the relationship between processors and computers.
Over the years we’ve been trained to see processors as the key component defining the difference between low-end and high-end computers.
Until now it always been the
case.
That extra money buys you more grunt to crush more numbers, render huge graphics files or kill virtual aliens faster.
It wasn’t always a linear
relationship. There were sweet spots in the Intel line-up
where you could buy the maximum bang for the minimum number
of bucks.
Or, to put it another
way, unless you have specific needs, there’s no longer any
need to worry about the processor part of a computer’s
specification.
Apple’s price-performance advantage is stark. Yes, you can buy Windows laptops or desktops for less than Mac prices. In cases, a lot less. If you’re not looking for performance, that remains a plausible buying strategy.
Otherwise, it is becoming harder and harder to
justify the prices of higher-end Intel-based laptops or
desktops.
Take Microsoft Surface. The devices have a lot going for them. It’s hard to make direct comparisons and, at the time of writing, the market is muddied by a lot of aggressive discounting.
Yet there are cases where Microsoft asks for 40 percent more than Apple for computers with shorter battery life and less raw processing power.
It’s much
the same when you look at HP, Dell or any other well-known
PC brand.
This isn’t always irrational. Many people have a lot invested in Windows, although that is less of a barrier than it was.Running Windows on Mac may be easy, but it means compromises and extra spending.
For everyone else, it’s getting harder and harder to walk past Apple’s computers.
On a personal note, I'm concerned that this looks unbalanced. Perhaps I've swallowed the Apple propaganda. The advantage seems so extreme, there must be a catch somewhere. I've been over the numbers repeatedly and I don't see it. Yes, you can find all kinds of reasons to not want an Apple computer, but, for now, the raw price-performance argument seems solid.
Apple M1: At least a generation ahead of
Intel was first posted at
billbennett.co.nz.
Home Page | Headlines | Previous Story | Next Story
Copyright (c) Scoop Media