https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1205/S00459/qa-panel-discussions-27-may-2012.htm
|
| ||
Q+A: Panel Discussions 27 May 2012 |
||
Q+A
PANEL
DISCUSSIONS
HOSTED BY PAUL
HOLMES
PAUL HOLMES
The
panel this morning is Dr Raymond Miller from Auckland
University, and the former ACT MP and minister Heather Roy,
now chair of the pharmaceutical lobby group Medicines New
Zealand, and we also have with us the head of the UNITE
union and the Herald on Sunday columnist Matt McCarten.
Well, does either of those two men have the
ideas?
HEATHER ROY - former ACT Deputy
Leader
No, I don’t think they do. I was hoping
for something bold in this budget. One measure would have
done it for me, and that would have been superannuation.
Bill English said it’s going to take 15 years to get any
change, but you’ve got to start planning for the future
now.
DR RAYMOND MILLER - Political
Scientist
That’s right. That’s an argument,
really, for announcing it right now. The point is, I think,
that they’ve made the promise. They don’t want to back
away from that promise. 20% of all voters are over the age
of 65. 40% are over the age of 50. They’re concerned about
electability. Many of those people, of course, are going to
be voting National. They’re just- Leadership is all about,
you know, it’s not about popularity only. It’s also
about being fair and
reasonable.
PAUL
But when we talk about the costs of super, that’s really a
cost-saving measure, isn’t it? Where’s what’s going to
address the exports? Exports drive this country. We’ve had
a 17% decline in the value of exports in the last six
months.
MATT MCCARTEN – UNITE
Union
Yeah, they’re not going to do it. The
problem- Where we come to a consensus is these guys don’t
work because they believe in the same model - the free
market will fix it. What do they do about the exporting?
They don’t know. So somehow they say, ‘Oh well, it’ll
kind of work out.’ And so we do get distracted on
superannuation. The truth is that superannuation is
affordable. And what Labour says, let’s move it. So
working people have gotta work longer, but they don’t
address, if they wanna be honest about it, you’ve got a
number of MPs, enormous amount of people are still working
and getting super. Then they go on about the KiwiSaver, make
that compulsory, which is actually gonna take the place of
pensions by the time the kids get to that
age.
RAYMOND
I think that’s
a really important point, and really what Shane was talking
about was this intergenerational fairness. $3.5
billion more it’ll cost for superannuation in four
years’ time. If there was more that went into growth
amongst the young, a sense of optimism, you know, in terms
of employment, in terms of curing problems like child
poverty, there are many opportunities that are there for a
government that really is prepared to recognise this
intergenerational fairness
issue.
PAUL
What about this issue with Australia? How serious do you
regard it?
MATT
Well, it was a few months ago we had a discussion here,
remember, when the Reserve Bank Governor came and said
we’re never gonna catch up with Australia. ‘Course, all
the politicians huffed and puffed. ‘This is outrageous.
This is our policy. We’re going to catch up with
Australia.’ Well, it seems the irony is we’re exporting
our kids to Australia so they can get Australian wages.
There is no answer None of them have got any answers. It’s
all very vague - ‘Oh, you know, if we tinker around.’
That’s because we don’t have any growth responsibility
by the state. We’ve given it
up.
PAUL
That’s another thing about the budget. Where is the big
idea to turn the country into another direction? Obviously
we need a new direction.
RAYMOND
Well, it is an accounting exercise, really, and this is part
of the problem. And if we keep going over the next five
years the way we’ve done this last year with Australia,
we’ll be losing a city the size of Wellington, and this is
a really serious problem.
PAUL It’s a
really serious problem. I don’t think it’s an
exaggeration to call it a diaspora. I mean, it’s an
exodus. 53,000 people last year.
HEATHER
It
is a lot, but you need to also look at who those people are.
Is it our best and brightest? Is it not? We want our young
people to travel. That’s always been a proud New Zealand
tradition, but we want them to come back. Unless we’ve got
strong economic growth, good jobs for them to come back to
and opportunity, they’re not going to come
back.
MATT But,
look, the new right and Heather’s ideology, they’ve had
the reins for this for 30 years, and now we’ve actually
got what they want. Kids are going. We’re going to be a
tourist outfit for the world, and that’s now our future.
Neither of those two parties put anything up about growth.
It’s all about cutting, cutting. I mean, to be fair,
Labour is starting to try and address it, but nothing
concrete It’s, ‘Oh, well, let’s save more’. What
does that
mean?
PAUL I
don’t know. That apparently helps the exporter as he walks
down the street in
Shanghai.
MATT
Well, 17% drop this
year.
PAUL
Yes, I know. Can I just go back to this Australia thing,
though? I heard a frightening thing the other night. You
know, after the budget the students were blockading Symonds
Street. I don’t know why, but they were.
MATT In protest
against the student loan restrictions, yeah.
PAUL Yes, the
rise from
10-
MATT To 12,
and in Australia it’s 4% after $60,000, and after $19,000
you pay 12% in this country, and then you say, ‘What sort
of message-‘ And then you’ve got the paper run thing and
you say, ‘What message is that sending to young people’?
PAUL Well,
stay on the students, because he says, ‘Well, because of
the 12%, now I’ve got no option but to stay in
Australia.’ And so we’ve got this benign student loan
scheme now being used as a weapon by students
to-
MATT Well,
the generations who made decisions to bring these loans in
actually got it from the taxpayer and didn’t actually have
a loan, so we’ve privatised education, and now we’re
privatising the super, then we hit the pay packets. What
message does it send? ‘Course they’re gonna go. Anyone
with half a brain is out of this
country.
RAYMOND
I
think to be fair to the government the signs of innovation
initiatives are very encouraging, but part of the problem is
a lot of that money comes out of the students, not just in
terms of the speed of paying back student loans, but also
post-graduate study, because allowances are being removed
for students who are going into post-graduate study. So
where is the knowledge economy? Where is the growth
there?
PAUL
And I think that it was stated the other day that we’re
gonna have 600 more engineers, and I thought, great for the
mining
industry.
MATT
Exactly. But here’s the thing, right - with the student
loans, they only go up to four years. So anyone who wants to
do post-graduate and comes from a poor family, there’s no
chance.
PAUL
Steven Joyce covered that off and said there’s no
difference. But listen, going back to this business of
holding the government to account. I mean, they’re saying
it’s not necessarily a failure that when they came in it
was the Westpac Stadium going - 35,000. Now it’s 53,000.
No one’s holding the government to
account.
MATT
No, it’s all vague. The best we can come up with - ‘Oh,
we like to see them travel.’ As we’ve just said, the
difference is they’re not coming
back.
RAYMOND
The
sad thing about it all, really, is there’s nothing
inspirational in this budget that would cause people to read
it and say, ‘I’m gonna stay
here.’
HEATHER
That’s right. There’s got to be a reason for people to
stay or a reason for people to come back. That comes back to
prudent fiscal management and strong economic growth.
MATT It’s
tinker and
hope.
PAUL
Tinker and hope, yes. That’s a very good thing - there’s
no inspiration. People need inspiration and hope, don’t
they?
PAUL
You’re back with Q+A and the final panel -
Raymond Miller, Heather Roy and Matt McMarten. How dangerous
were that
crowd?
MATT
Well, on the day, when you see the TV, you think, ‘Wow,
what’s going on here?’ And then they mention that the
terrorist cell leader is Tame Iti, and then you realise - is
this a joke?
HEATHER
Yes,
looking at those drills, I don’t think they’d have got
me through my army basic training. But we have to remember-
I’ve got a slightly different take on this, maybe, from
others. Remember that at that time the police were operating
under the Terrorism Suppression Act, and the state had
actually had huge power bestowed on it, and when you do that
you actually need checks and balances in place. Then the
solicitor general came in and said, ‘This isn’t
treason’-
PAUL
Having first of all apparently said,
‘Yes, you can use the act.’
HEATHER
That’s right. Then it went to the Crimes Act, and then it
ended up being charges under the Arms Act. Now, should New
Zealanders be allowed to run around with unlicensed weapons
and Molotov cocktails? Absolutely not. And so that’s where
we’ve got to now. It was a comedy of errors, and nobody
comes out of this looking any good at
all.
RAYMOND
But the thing is that they’d been monitoring their
behaviour for 18 months. Now, surely if there was such a
danger they could have moved in long before that. They
allowed the leader of the opposition to go in and be
vulnerable there. I mean, it seems very strange. They went
on this fishing expedition, basically, to try and find out
what they could. Having monitored for 18 months, they should
have known who the people were. The other thing that really
concerns me is that, you know, we live in a democracy, and
here is the Minister of
Police-
PAUL
The Commissioner of Police.
RAYMOND
Yes,
but the Minister of Police is not being adequately informed
the night before. Now, he says it’s an operational matter.
The politicians- the buck stops with them. They have to
actually answer for the behaviour of the police. I think
that, you know, he was extremely dismissive of the Minister
of Police and the role she played as
accountable-
PAUL
Annette King was adamant at the time that this was not what
she was briefed on, that this was well beyond the scale of
what she’d been briefed
upon.
MATT
It’s been a farce from start to finish. As you say, no one
is covered in glory in this. Anyone with an IQ above average
knows exactly what went
on.
PAUL Well,
tell me, because I’m a bit
slow.
MATT OK,
Tame Iti is an icon. This is up in the Ureweras in the
Tuhoe. There’s a history there. Young kids from Wellington
go up there for trips. They do Maoritanga. Part of it was
out in the bush. Everyone in the Tuhoe’s got guns. The guy
who went to jail, all the guns there were licenced. There
were four which weren’t. Rangi’s were licenced. They
went out and had a bit of a shoot round. We’re not talking
about Molotov cocktails. We’re talking Coke bottles, one,
with petrol in it, and they threw it. They talked stuff.
Anyone who’s had kids or been to the pub knows that you
talk politics and you do things. But here’s the
seriousness of the raid. I think they’ve watched too much
American TV. There were raids on the same day in Aro Valley
in Wellington, where a number of them were picked up. Any
roadblocks there? No. Knocked on the door, ‘Can you come
with us, please? Get your bags.’ It was different.
That’s the thing. One last thing. Tame Iti, when he got
arrested, the great ‘terrorist’, was allowed to go to
Paris, not on the terrorist watchlist, and go on a holiday
around the art galleries in Europe. That’s the level
of-
PAUL The
Police Commissioner was dismissive of the story about the
school bus, kohanga reo bus, having ninjas jump on the bus,
but here’s what the bus driver told us at the
time.
---CLIP---
BUS
DRIVER
I was one of the drivers. They did
hop on our bus and they did search our
bus.
REPORTER
How many police hopped on the
bus?
DRIVER
One
Kotahi.
REPORTER
Was he
armed?
DRIVER
Yes, he was. He had a- They always held their
rifles.
---END OF
CLIP---
PAUL
So who do you believe, I suppose? And that’s on the day.
You believe the witness on the day, don’t
you?
RAYMOND
I still do think an apology is in order, and quite frankly,
that was the most half-hearted attempt at an apology from
the Commissioner. If people really were upset - and it seems
that there is plenty of evidence that they were - then there
is no harm in the police going in and actually apologising.
PAUL Well,
who was he apologising to? He’s talking about the innocent
people, isn’t he, he’ll apologise
to.
MATT Of
course. He goes on as if somehow he’s been asked to
apologise to the defendants. No one’s asked for that. See,
what they’re doing is they can’t admit they botched up
from day one. All this Terrorism Act, it all got thrown out,
so it’s firearm charges. Tame and his mate were always
going to jail because the establishment now has to actually
not just send them to jail, has to prove the whole
thing’s- That’s why they went to jail. And your case
about the Rena - 7 months, 2 ½ years, - says exactly what
this is about. Who’s done more damage to this
country?
HEATHER
I think you also need to remember that the Terrorism
Suppression Act was there and bestowed huge power on the
state, which allowed the police to think they had the right
to go in. And so it’s not just the police who are
responsible. The politicians putting in place the
legislation also need to be held to
account.
PAUL
And there I’ve gotta leave it. Thank you all very much,
panel – Raymond Miller, Heather and Matt McCarten.
MATT We’re
waiting for an arrest for the Pike River. The Commissioner
can get on to that
now.
PAUL
Yes.
ENDS