https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1207/S00170/qa-corin-dann-interviews-hone-harawira.htm
|
| ||
Q+A: Corin Dann interviews Hone Harawira |
||
Q+A: Corin Dann interviews Hone
Harawira
Maori Party should walk over this
issue but won’t - this is exactly the same as the
Foreshore and Seabed which saw the Maori Party
formed.
John Key’s comments insulted the judicial
process and attacked the Waitangi Tribunal.
Maori
have the opportunity to use the treaty to provide a lead for
New Zealanders to stop the asset
sales.
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TV ONE.
Thanks to the support from NZ ON
Air.
Q+A is on Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/NZQandA#!/NZQandA
and on Twitter, http://twitter.com/#!/NZQandA
Q+A
CORIN
DANN INTERVIEWS
HONE
HARAWIRA
CORIN
DANN
Another bump in the road for the
government’s controversial asset sales. This time it’s
Maori claims over water rights. The week saw an urgent
Waitangi Tribunal hearing into the matter. But the Prime
Minister stirred things up by saying the government can
ignore the tribunal’s outcome, meaning any decision
wouldn’t affect the sale of Mighty River Power. John
Key’s attitude towards the tribunal has left many Maori
furious - Tariana Turia called it ‘corrosive’ - and
it’s left the Maori Party relationship with National in
jeopardy. Former Maori Party MP, now Mana Party leader Hone
Harawira joins us. Kia ora.
HONE HARAWIRA,
Mana Party
leader
Kia ora,
Corin.
CORIN
Do you think the Maori Party should walk
now?
HONE I
think the Maori Party should have walked over the Marina
Coastal Area Bill. They should walk over this. They didn’t
then; they won’t now.
CORIN But
it’s a reasonable position for them to take. There’s a
number of hurdles still to come. There’s the tribunal’s
findings to come back. There’s potential court action.
They need to work through this, don’t
they?
HONE
Who’s this, the Maori Party or the
government?
CORIN
The Maori Party.
HONE Look,
you can’t talk about the Prime Minster’s comments as
being corrosive and insulting and inflaming and then stay at
the table. You’ve got to make a decision that- This is
exactly what Helen Clark said about the foreshore and
seabed. If our Prime Minister is saying this about water,
should we be doing what they did then? And the answer is,
yes, they
should.
CORIN
But Helen Clark legislated. She took away a right for Maori.
That hasn’t been done yet. So why walk away before we get
to that
point?
HONE
Because at the end of the day that’s exactly where John
Key is heading. He’s right to say that it’s non-binding,
and he can ignore it, but in the same way Helen Clark also
ignored the opportunity for the High Court to rule, and she
brought in legislation. John Key could do exactly the same
thing, and chances are he will. If the Maori Council gets a
good ruling from the Tribunal, takes it to the High Court,
gets a positive ruling there, I have no doubt that John Key
will legislate to take control of the water.
CORIN But the
Maori Party’s got a relationship here. Why not stay inside
the tent, work at them, try and make sure that the Maori
Party can get the best that they can get from inside the
tent?
HONE
You’ve been at the news desk for the last two or three
years, Corin. You tell me. Their flagship policy is Whanau
Ora. What’s the one success they’ve had with Whanau
Ora?
CORIN
Well, they’re getting money out into community groups and
giving presumably low-income Maori New Zealanders the
support they
need.
HONE
Tariana budgeted that at $1 billion and they’ve got $134
million. 13.4%. That’s no success. It’s been an absolute
failure in terms of what it was that they aimed to achieve.
In terms of what’s been a success at Whanau Ora, I doubt
that any commentator could tell me. So if you’re at the
table to achieve those gains, you’ve gotta ask yourself
‘what are those gains?’, and if they’re not there, and
you’re continuing to be insulted, then it’s time to
move.
CORIN
All right, I’m gonna ask you about John Key’s comments.
Do you think he was being deliberate with his comments, or
was he being sloppy, or he just didn’t think it
through?
HONE
Don’t really
care.
CORIN
No, but it matters, because if it was
deliberate-
HONE
What matters is how the rest of New Zealand sees it. Now, by
insulting the judicial process and insulting the commitment
that Maori have made to that process, he’s also sending a
signal - ‘Get used to this, New Zealand, because if this
goes through to the High Court, I’m likely to
insult-‘
CORIN
How exactly did he insult the process? He stated what has
happened in the past.
HONE It’s
also true that in the past governments legislate over the
top of the High Court, but do you hear him ever insulting
the High Court by saying, ‘That’s non-binding and we can
legislate against that as
well’?
CORIN
And they do. Governments do
legislate.
HONE
Yes, they do, but does he ever insult the High Court by
saying
so?
CORIN How
did he insult the Tribunal,
though?
HONE
Has he ever said that about the High Court? The answer is
no. He’s attacked the Tribunal because it’s seen to be a
Maori thing and because he doesn’t particularly care for
the Maori vote anyway. And by him saying things like,
‘Well, I’ve insulted the Tribunal, but guess what -
I’m totally sure, I’m totally positive that this is not
going to upset my relationship with the Maori Party.’ He
already knows that they’re going to stay at the table.
I’ll put down $100 they stay.
CORIN
What’s your sense on the feeling within Maoridom about
this? Is there a sense that there’s gonna be hikois
heading for parliament about this? Is there the same level
of outrage as there was over the foreshore and seabed?
HONE I
think the difference between the foreshore and seabed and
this one here is that water and the state asset sales are
issues that affect all New Zealanders in exactly the same
way. The majority of us don’t support it. And so I think
that what’s happening is that John Key is going to see
more and more New Zealanders come on board. You’re seeing
a lot of first-time protestors. You’re seeing a lot of
marches - big marches - turning into rolling protests. I’m
getting emails from Pakehas that I’ve never met before
wishing us well in this fight against the asset sales.
CORIN OK, so
the asset sales is one fight, but why are we having the
scrap about water ownership now? I mean, this could have
happened- You could have gone to the Tribunal, presumably, a
long time
ago.
HONE
Yeah, I think Maori, and Tuwharetoa’s made the position,
as have another of the claimants in the Tribunal hearing,
that as long as water is available for the benefit of all
New Zealanders, you know, we’re comfortable working slowly
through the process of establishing that kaitiakitanga,
rangatiratanga and mana, but the minute that the government
says, ‘We’re gonna use that and we’re gonna sell
shares in the future of the use of that water on the open
market,’ then that really hurts all of New Zealand.
CORIN
That’s an excellent point. Tuwharetoa, you could argue,
have a pretty good claim. They own a lake which stores the
water which gets used for Mighty River Power to generate
electricity. That could be a good claim which can go through
a separate process. Why do we have to be going through a
discussion now about who owns water in general, which is a
very hard concept to get your head around? Is it right to
ownership of water? What is
it?
HONE The
Maori Council’s claim is quite simple – that the Maori
interest in water has yet to be settled. This is not an
ownership claim. It’s about recognition of Kaitiakitanga
and the principle of guardianship over resources that have
been part and parcel of our history since we first got here.
Every Maori you talk to will identify themselves by their
marae, by their mountain, by their river. That is how much
water is important to Maori. If we don’t settle that
interest, those issues will be ongoing, and I’m glad,
because I think that Maori have the opportunity here to use
the Treaty to provide a lead for all New Zealanders in
stopping the sale of the assets that nobody wants.
CORIN Hone
Harawira, thank you very much for your time.
ENDS