https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO1210/S00079/qa-paul-holmes-interviews-john-tamihere.htm
|
| ||
Q+A: Paul Holmes interviews John Tamihere |
||
Q+A: Paul Holmes interviews John
Tamihere.
Former Cabinet minister
“looking seriously” at return to Parliament and “being
lobbied quite a bit”, but too early in electoral cycle to
declare.
But Tamihere lets slip “the only thing
that would stop me making a return” would be family and
voters.
Criticises his old party: “There’s no
doubt, the [Labour] front bench is not firing across the
whole line, whether it’s health, welfare or
education.”
Factional fighting within Labour
could be good for the party in the long run “because out
of those trials and tribulations comes a strengthened
group”.
Would only stand for Labour, but won’t
be contesting a Maori seat – “been there done that”,
politics in Maori seats is “extraordinarily
grueling”.
Is targeting Waitakere: “I’m from
the region, know it back to front… The Waitakere seat is
not a marginal seat. It’s a safe seat for Labour. It
should never have been lost in 2008 and should have been won
back 2011.”
Asked about who might be good to
replace Shearer as Labour leader: “Gosh, that’s a very
good question… I can’t come back to you with an informed
decision.”
“We are gouging our middle class,
and that’s why people are going to
Australia.”
“Crony capitalism” companies
gouging New Zealand with state-created virtual
monopolies.
“If you think that Fletcher’s
haven’t set the supply side of construction, haven’t set
the dollar values for subcontractors and for labourers in
this country and continue to gouge it… you’ve got
another thing coming.”
Wants to stop Australian
banks as they “shovel billions” back to
Australia.
Q+A, 9-10am Sundays on TV ONE
and one hour later on TV ONE plus
1.
Thanks to the support from NZ
ON Air.
Q+A is on Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/NZQandA#!/NZQandA
and on Twitter, http://twitter.com/#!/NZQandA
Q
+ A – October 7, 2012
JOHN
TAMIHERE
Former Labour Cabinet
Minister
Interviewed by PAUL
HOLMES
PAUL
You were saying just before we went on air – I think you
feel it’s unfinished business.
JOHN
TAMIHERE Well, you always do, but what I’d say
is that it’s early in the electoral cycle to be absolutely
definitive about a
return.
PAUL
Right, so you’re not going to tell me much at all this
morning.
MR TAMIHERE What I
want to say in terms of this conversation – I think Russel
Norman’s raising it – is that the market that we have in
this New Zealand is a myth; that there's crony capitalism.
It’s all monopolies and cartels, and so the promise of
Rogernomics has gone, and so therefore we have to change the
major macroeconomic
settings.
PAUL
Let us talk about that, though, when we get into a bit more
of the interview. I mean, why would you want, though, to go
back? I mean, do you want to go back?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, let me put it this way:
I’m a practitioner on the street, and in terms of trying
to change in terms of volumes into prisons and hospitals,
right. To do that, there's a lot of things that can help you
achieve that and there's a lot of things that can get in the
way. Now, you’ve got to change some
policies.
PAUL
So are your saying--? I mean, I think you were saying to us
the other day that you’d rather like to be in there doing
things rather than being a paid political commentator on the
outside discussing things.
MR
TAMIHERE A paid political commentator is
quite handsome. There's no doubt about that. You don’t
suffer the same difficulties. But you do have to make a
decision sooner or later as to whether you’re going to
jump in the ring or
not.
PAUL
So you are seriously considering going back,
yeah?
MR TAMIHERE
Yeah.
PAUL
We can say this morning that you are giving it serious
consideration, the 2014 race?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, I’ve been lobbied quite
a
bit.
PAUL
By whom?
MR TAMIHERE Well, I
don’t intend breaking confidences right now, because
there's a nomination and a race to be won if you do go down
that track. And so I’m looking seriously at
it.
PAUL
I think a lot of people might be looking at you, saying why
would you want to go back in? Because last time, God, it
ended in such grief for you.
MR
TAMIHERE Yeah, well, that’s what my
wife said. (laughs) But, you
know—
PAUL
Well, she probably went through it.
MR
TAMIHERE Oh, the whole family did, and
the only thing that would stop me making a return would be
that conversation and getting across that
line.
PAUL
Why would it be different, though, this time?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, I’m a lot more wiser.
I’ve been around a lot more and a lot more experienced, in
the event that I did throw my hat in the ring. But I also
think that— I know, for instance, that with, say, the
growing age that we’re going to have major issues in
pensions if we don’t do something. Same with
education.
PAUL
Well, we’re talking Waitakere, surely? You probably would
be looking at Waitakere, would you?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, look, I’ve played
league out there – New Lynn and Glenora. I mean, I’m
from the region, know it back to
front.
PAUL
You wouldn’t be chasing a Maori seat?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, I’m over
it.
PAUL
(laughs) Explain.
MR TAMIHERE
Well... (laughs) I’ve been there and done that, and those
sort of politics— The politics in the Maori seats are
extraordinarily gruelling, and I think that it’s time for
building bridges and to do the
crossovers.
PAUL
I suppose the other big question people will be asking you
– and they are going to ask you next year at the selection
process, if we get that far – is can you beat Paula
Bennett?
MR TAMIHERE The
Waitakere seat is not a marginal seat. It’s a safe seat
for Labour. It should never have been lost in 2008 and
should have been won back 2011. Now, something needs to
happen within the party to up that
conversation.
PAUL
So you would be talking Labour?
MR
TAMIHERE Labour is the only party that
has provided worthwhile change to the country, from the
’35-’38 Labour government, even the ’57 government,
which reset tax. And you look at Kirk – if we’d stayed
the course on the superannuation programme, we’d be a
generation ahead of Australia and so
on.
PAUL
Let me just ask you one more of these questions about the
return. I mean, how do you cease to be yesterday’s man? I
mean, is there a second chance?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, you’ve had a
few!
(both laugh)
MR
TAMIHERE So, you know, work it out.
Yeah.
PAUL
Fair enough. How are the left doing at the moment, do you
think? Because you’re obviously expressing some concerns
about the policies we’ve been following more or less
since, what, 1994.
MR TAMIHERE
Yeah. No, no, there's no doubt that the Rogernomic economic
settings— The jury is in and the evidence is palpable –
it’s wrong. It’s got to be changed. So people who are
earning $60,000 to $80,000 watching this programme today –
they’re finding it tough. Can you imagine what it’s
like on $50,000 or less? So we’re gouging out our middle
class, and that’s why people are going to
Australia.
PAUL
So are you now talking--? Like, you want to see a major
economic shift in direction. You want us to try different
things. Some of those things might be things that were tried
in the past under Muldoon and didn’t work, of
course.
MR TAMIHERE No, no,
I’m not suggesting capitalism is wrong. I’m suggesting
to you that the crony capitalism we have applied is
absolutely out of whack and it’s provided— There's no
competition.
PAUL
What do you mean by crony capitalism?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, I’ll give you a couple
of—
PAUL
It’s a small country. Everyone’s going to know everyone
else.
MR TAMIHERE I’ll give
you an example. If you think that Fletcher’s haven’t set
the supply side of construction, haven’t set the dollar
values for subcontractors and for labourers in this country
and continue to gouge it, and then we make out that
they’re great businessmen when you’ve given a
state-granted monopoly, you’ve got another thing
coming.
PAUL
You’re talking about Christchurch?
MR
TAMIHERE I’m not just talking about
Christchurch. I’m talking about the supply side in
grocery. We’ve only got two in grocery. The
telecommunications – we’ve only got two. The banks –
we’ve got four, and they shovel billions of dollars across
the ditch. Now, you’ve just got to stop
it.
PAUL
Let me ask you a couple of quickies. Does there need to be a
reshuffle of the Labour Party front bench?
MR
TAMIHERE The Labour Party front bench
has not fired as well as it
could.
PAUL
Has Labour reconnected with the people as Shearer wanted
to?
MR TAMIHERE Look, it’s in
a major constitutional review and it’s in a major review
of its whole
processes.
PAUL
Is that a “no” answer?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, it’s in rebuild mode,
as National was in 2002 after that outrageous defeat then.
Labour’s got to come through
that.
PAUL
Well, we’re up to 2012. We need to get rebuilt pretty
quickly, don’t we?
MR
TAMIHERE I think it’s happening
quite— Well, look, you mightn’t be aware of it, but out
on the street, there's new conversations going. There's new
energy being clicked into the party. Because after 19 years
of Clark, power actually starts to implode towards the
centre. So the party’s had to go out and regrow
activism.
PAUL
Well, another simple way of putting that might be to quote
Deborah Coddington on ZB yesterday, who said, well, all the
members of the Labour Party hate each other. So that’s the
problem they’ve got, really, about rebuilding is that
they’re at each other’s throats, they’re all still
doing numbers on the leadership and so forth.
MR
TAMIHERE Well, the problem you’ve got
is the same as with National, if I could reflect on that,
because I watched that very closely. After their loss in
’99 and 2002, you do have factions, but, you know,
that’s a healthy contest, and you’ve got to see it
healthy in the first instance, because out of those trials
and tribulations comes a strengthened
group.
PAUL
Yeah, but we’re now 2012, as I say. I mean, do you think
David Shearer’s got to really reshuffle that front bench?
I mean, you can’t honestly look at that front bench and
think they’re performing well as an
Opposition.
MR TAMIHERE
That’s true, but he’s also got to look to 2014 for the
list.
PAUL
It’s critical, because this week – you take this week.
Bad week for the government. Should have been. More Dotcom
coming left, right and centre at the Prime
Minister.
MR TAMIHERE You’ve
got me. There’s no
doubt—
PAUL
Wilkinson’s reversal on Mike Tyson.
MR
TAMIHERE Front bench is not
firing.
PAUL
No.
MR TAMIHERE Across the
whole line, whether it’s health, welfare or education, and
those are the biggies. But there's a lot of other things
going on, and I agree with that, but what you have to say is
Shearer’s a decent bloke, got a strong social conscience
and doesn’t have any fingerprints on either the Lange era
or the Clark
era.
PAUL
Well, you’ve got a lot of fingerprints, of course, over
quite a few groups. For example, you’d have to get past
the gays, you’d have to get past the unionists, and
you’d have to get past the women to win Waitakere
nomination, wouldn’t you? Can you do that?
MR
TAMIHERE Well, you know, I don’t...
The tussle and the contest, in the event that I did flag,
I’d look forward
to.
PAUL
Who—? If you just took a, you know, just a little punt at
the moment, just thinking around. We’re not on telly or
anything like that, just pretend for a moment. If
David—
MR TAMIHERE I’ll
just pretend you’re Ian Wishart.
(both
laugh)
PAUL
My tape recorder. The red light’s on. If David Shearer
were not leader, who would be a good leader, do you think?
Who do you think the party could go with at the moment,
safely?
MR TAMIHERE Gosh,
that’s a very good question. It’s one that I haven’t
given much thought to, because I did back Shearer, right. I
can’t come back to you with an informed
decision.
PAUL
That’s fair enough. We’ll leave that there. No, there's
plenty of time for you to think about this. I’m sure there
will be. John Tamihere, thank you for your
time.
ENDS