International Solidarity Movement Update

ISM Digest 8/10/07

1.Haaretz: The Hebron Tactic 2. Christian Peacemaker Teams Delegation to Install Football Net in Old City 3. Al-Jazeera: Israel Evicts Hebron Settlers 4. Haaretz: IDF to halt training in populated West Bank villages 5.MIFTAH: Family Reunification 6. Hebron: Spitting in Babies' Faces 7.Hebron: Masked Settlers Attack Human Rights Worker 8. Haaretz: A Visit to the Jungle 9. Settlers Suspected as Qurdoba School Set Ablaze

Haaretz: The Hebron Tactic August 9th, 2007 By Amira Hass For about 25 minutes, they behaved liked lords of the land: One man, followed later by a young guy, descended from Mitzpeh Yair, one of the unauthorized outposts in the southern Mt. Hebron area, and prevented a United Nations jeep from traveling. UN directives prohibit leaving the vehicle in such cases, in order to avoid an escalation of friction. And so we, three Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) staffers and two Haaretz journalists, were forced to watch them demonstrate their lordliness from inside the car: The older one blocked the vehicle, in the middle of the unpaved road, with his body. Using hand movements, he ordered the engine shut down. When that didn't happen, he jumped on the hood and then on the roof and back on the hood, and finally lay back on the windshield and played with the wipers, taking them apart. The driver progressed slowly down the track, and the man leaned back on the windshield with force, until it broke and shards went into the driver's eyes. In the meantime, the younger guy appeared. He tried opening the doors of the jeep, screaming, "show me your identity cards" and placing big rocks in front of the wheels. By the time the army and police drove up, the older man yelled at Haaretz photographer Alex Levac: "Go back to where you came from."

When he realized that Levac was a Jew and born in this country, he shouted: "Traitor, going with the UN." Both the older man and younger guy living at the outpost were born abroad. The younger man, a British citizen, has not yet been given new- immigrant status. But what does that matter? It also didn't matter that the soldier described them as "problematic" and that the police are familiar with the older man from previous incidents of harassment.

Nor did it matter that the police officers did not believe their absurd story that we had been in their olive grove and that we had tried to run the older man over. The tactic is one that is well-known from Hebron, the same tactic that helped to cleanse the Old City of most of its Palestinian residents: Jews harass and bully and then threaten to lodge complaints against their victims with the Israeli police. Harassment and sabotage of a much more serious nature than what we experienced has become routine for the Palestinian shepherds and farmers in the area. As a result, about 850 of the 3,500 or so inhabitants of the area known as Masafer Yatta (Yatta's periphery) have left their habitations, in caves and tent encampments.

Sometimes it is their access to water sources that is damaged, sometimes their herds, other times themselves. They have piles of papers attesting to the police complaints they have submitted. Until they stopped filing complaints. It is easy to blame the two men, or those like them. But they practice terrorizing Palestinians because Israeli authorities let them do so. In their own way, they do the same thing the "legitimate" occupation authorities do: They drive the Palestinians off their land to make room for Jews. In other words, they are following orders. About 10 days ago, a Civil Administration inspector impounded a tractor and water tanker belonging to the Hadidyah, a community of farmers and herders in the northern Jordan Valley, as a pressure tactic aimed at getting them to leave their tent encampment on the grounds that it is located in a closed military area. They are one of dozens of communities that have been living in the valley for many decades. Since 1967 the Hadidyah have been displaced four times. Using all sorts of inventive tactics, the occupation authorities have turned these communities into unauthorized residents on their own land. The springs and wells they used were turned over to the Mekorot Water Company: The water from the national company's drilling nearby is used by the "legitimate" settlers and its use by the Hadidyah is prohibited. As a result, they have to truck in water from a distant spring. The army has declared large areas of the valley firing zones. They end at the boundaries of the settlements. The Israeli authorities have refused to rezone land to enable the community to live in the place the elders remember as their childhood home.

But the adjacent land has been rezoned for the residence of Jews, Israeli citizens. Now the Civil Administration is hoping that thirst will drive them out of the piece of land allotted to them, which no longer has any land suitable for agriculture or grazing. That is Israel's policy toward the Palestinians in a nutshell, and talk of peace has not stopped it. The residents of the unauthorized outposts are merely imitating it and receiving both inspiration and protection from it. ***********************************

Christian Peacemaker Teams Delegation to Install Football Net in Old City August 8th, 2007 By Christian Peacemaker Teams On Thursday, August 9th, at 11:00 am, a delegation from Christian Peacemaker Teams (CPT) will install a net across the street in front of the CPT apartment in the Chicken Market of the Old City. The delegates will connect the netting to the CPT apartment building and the building opposite, which is occupied by the Israeli military. The netting will hang in front of the razor wire and metal fence at the end of the street in order to prevent players from kicking the balls over the fence. For the past several weeks, local youths have gathered at the improvised football pitch on the street in front of the CPT apartment, in Souq Shaheen, for a daily football practice. Zleekha Muhtaseb, a local kindergarten teacher, and CPT worked with boys from the Old City to form a football team in February 2007. It has proved difficult to find a suitable place for the practice, and the street has proved an ideal area, but for the fact that players occasionally kick the ball over the razor wire fence and concrete barrier blocking access from the market to Shuhada Street. The balls land on Shuhada Street, where the Palestinian youths cannot enter, and it is not possible to retrieve the balls. In December of 2006 the Israeli Defense Force issued an order allowing Palestinian pedestrian movement along Shuhada Street and the Attorney General assured the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) that the street would be opened. However, the street remains blocked and Palestinians generally cannot enter. Muhtaseb said "I am happy that this netting is to be erected. We have lost several balls after boys kicked them too high. The football is important for the young boys and it gives them a way to use their energy in a constructive way."

************************ Al Jazeera: Israel Evicts Hebron Settlers link to video by: Al Jazeera and agencies Israeli security forces have removed about two dozen Jewish settlers and supporters from two Palestinian properties they took over last year in an abandoned Palestinian market in the West Bank city of Hebron. Hundreds of Israeli border guards moved in at dawn on Tuesday to evict the settlers from the buildings they had been occupying. A police spokesman said 14 police officers and 12 settlers were injured during scuffles, with settlers throwing stones and showering soldiers with urine. Five people were arrested during the operation, police said. Settler leaders said the eviction was a criminal act and insisted that their protest was peaceful. "This is a crime against justice and against Jewish history," said Noam Arnon, a spokesman for the Hebron settlers. "I am sure we will return. Hebron has a long history and we will return." Settlers as victims? Jacky Rowland, Al Jazeera's Jerusalem correspondent, said: "The settlers are defying the authorities and they are keen to portray themselves as the victims. "Within a matter of weeks, the settlers will probably find a way to reoccupy the houses." The two settler families that took over the structures said they were once owned by Jews. About 650 Israelis live illegally in heavily guarded enclaves in Hebron, home to about 180,000 Palestinians, and have long sought to expand the Jewish presence in the biblical city. Settlers in Hebron are among the most militant in the West Bank, territory Israel has occupied since the 1967 Middle East war.

Soldiers sentenced The Israeli army said on Monday it sentenced several soldiers to one month's imprisonment for refusing to take part in the forced removal of the settlers. "Of the dozen soldiers - 10 ordinary ranks and two officers - tried for 'refusing to obey orders', several were sentenced to four weeks in military prison," a military spokesman said. The soldiers, most of them religious, told their commanding officers that they would refuse to join in the operation to evacuate the Hebron market, an army spokesman said.

"A number of soldiers from the Kfir regiment training base protested before their commanders this (Monday) morning over the task they had been given," the army said. General Gadi Shamni, the head of the central army command, ordered the court martial of "two company commanders and some 10 soldiers, who will be removed from their unit", the army said in another statement. Zvi Handel, an ultra-nationalist opposition legislator, expressed support for the insubordinate soldiers. "I am proud that we have soldiers who think before obeying illegal orders and refuse to be part of a political game," he said. *******************************

Haaretz: IDF to halt training in populated West Bank villages

August 7th, 2007 By Amos Harel The Israel Defense Forces will no longer conduct reserves training exercises which involve the "capture" of populated villages in the West Bank, the military Advocate General Brigadier General Avihai Mandelblit announced this week. Mandelblit informed the human rights organization Yesh Din of the army's decision pending the completion of an investigation into the practice. Yesh Din approached the advocate general in March, after several complaints were filed by reserves soldiers serving in paratrooper battalions. The battalions were trained in the capture of villages in the West Bank as well as battle in residential areas. These exercises were carried out without any military justification. The 'dry-run' exercises were carried out without live fire, but nonetheless sparked panic among the residents of the villages. Mandelblit responded to Yesh Din's attorney Michael Sfard, announcing that the IDF would reexamine their policy on these types of training exercises. Mandelblit said the investigation would include the scope of the exercises as well as their immediate effect on the population of the Arab villages in question.

The advocate general promised that until the completion of the probe, these trainings would be halted. Sfard also requested that a criminal investigation be launched against those responsible for the existence of such training, claiming that the exercises unnecessarily endangered lives. The advocate general rejected this request, saying that no crime had been committed.

*****************************

Family Reunification August 7th, 2007 By MIFTAH Since the beginning of Israeli occupation in 1967, all policies towards curbing the process of Palestinian family reunification have greatly threatened normal and stable family life for many. This has been especially true for residents of Jerusalem, whose linkage with the West Bank has been severed, not only geographically but also socially. Families have had to establish two homes, one in Jerusalem and one in the West Bank, which is disruptive to children's educational process to say the least.

Israel's policy is far from benign; its control of people's basic right to choose a spouse and create a family is a malicious attempt to drive people out of the city of Jerusalem, specifically, and even to encourage Arab migration outside the boundaries of Palestinian Authority areas and Israel proper.

This "silent transfer" does not get the attention it deserves, because it is just that, a quiet but consistent pressure on Palestinian residents of Jerusalem and Arab citizens of Israel to leave. Brief Timeline: 1967 - Family unification of a limited number of Palestinian refugees was allowed. 45,000-50,000 persons were approved for family unification between 1967 and 1972 under this policy. The original requests amounted to 140,000 and approval was denied to males between the ages of 16-60. 1973 - Most applications for family unification were denied. The policy was unclear and was done on "strict confidential criteria" .

Over 150,000 families put in requests for unification from 1973 - 1982, but only 1,000 requests were approved annually. 1983 - A new policy was set in place to make it impossible to approve requests for family unification. Part of the policy was to deny applicants for family unification a permit to enter to visit his or her family if an application is in the process. The procedure could take a number of years and it was expected that a parent and spouse would want to see their family during that period. As a result, many families either did not apply for family unification in order to secure the right to get a permit or moved to the Occupied Palestinian Territories to be with their spouse, thus risking their own residency rights in Jerusalem. Alternatively, some chose to stay in the city on an expired permit, risking deportation and denial of reentry. >From 1983 to August 1992 only a few hundred requests were approved annually, based largely on administrative and humanitarian needs.

This was slightly amended in 1985 to include a provision that stipulates that an applicant must remain away until his or her request is approved. Before 1987, children were automatically registered in their father's Jerusalem ID, regardless of the status of their mother. After 1987 a new military order forbid registration of a child whose mother is not already a resident. 1993 - An annual quota of 2,000 requests for family unification was implemented starting August of that year; however, the exact number of approved applications is unclear. This new policy restricted requests to those made for a spouse and any child under the age of 16. The previous military order concerning a non-resident mother was annulled, but it was still ignored by the Civil Administration in reviewing cases for family unification. 1995 - After the establishment of the Palestinian Authority, the aforementioned quota system remained in effect, but also included requests coming from throughout the Occupied Territories, including areas under the PA's control. 1998 & 1999 - The quota system rose to 3,000 per year and according to some figures 3,000 applications in both years were approved. 2000 - The quota system was raised to 4,000 family reunification requests. Despite the rise in the quota, only 3,600 requests were approved that year. Since 2000, all family reunification requests have been frozen. 2003 - The Knesset enacts the Nationality and Entry into Israel (Temporary Order) Law, 5762-2003 in July. This law effectively annulled all the procedures for family unification. One of the main reasons for this law was on security grounds, especially since "The granting of a permit to stay for the purpose of settling in Israel to a resident of a state or political entity that is in armed conflict with the State of Israel entails a security risk, in that the allegiance and commitment of the said person is liable to be to the state or political entity in conflict with Israel. And because it is possible to pressure a person whose family members continue to live in such a place, to get that person to assist terror organizations, if he doesn't want any harm to come to his family..." Process and Procedures: The Israeli Ministry of Interior very rarely approved applications for family reunification. It imposed strict criteria, often changing rules and policies in the middle of the application procedure. This often meant that the spouse applying for family unification must submit another application based on the new changes. It is a long process with no set timeframe and can drag on for decades. According to Israeli human rights organization B'Tselem it can take ten years on average from the day of submission to the day the family reunification request is finally approved. Before 1991, many families opted out of the process because there were no movement restrictions between Jerusalem and the West Bank. Early in 1991, however, a new Israeli policy was being enforced, requiring that all West Bank ID holders obtain permits in order to enter Jerusalem and Israel. The introduction of stricter movement measures in 1993 spelled disaster for many families, who had never even contemplated that their lives would be torn apart as such, with one parent on one side of a checkpoint and the other on the opposite side. During the processing of an application, applicants were not allowed to reside in Jerusalem during that period. On the other hand, if the spouse applying on behalf of their wife was known to be living in the West Bank, his residency rights were jeopardized. This made ordinary family life a challenge. Families applying for unification were made to jump through hoops, displaying intimate details of their lives for Ministry of Interior officials, only to have even more unreasonable demands made. Proof of residence, producing utilities bills, school registration forms for children, etc. were all requested in addition to many more documents. There was no written policy in the Ministry of Interior and the papers required from each applicant were left to the case file officer to determine. In addition, the male spouse of a women requesting unification must undergo a thorough security check. If the wife is a West Bank citizen, her Jerusalem ID husband would also need to go through the same background check. After the outbreak of the second Intifada in September 2000, the process became more difficult in light of "security concerns" as per the Israeli official line. Between 100,000 and 140,000 persons from the Occupied Territories became legal residents in Israel between 1993 and 2003 as a result of the process of family unification. Of these, only 23 persons or 0.02 per cent actually carried out attacks against Israel . The security reason, therefore, did not appear to be a convincing reason for the difficulties that faced applicants of family unification. Whether in Israel proper or Jerusalem, there are some strong arguments that indicate that the actual reason for the halting of the unification process really has to do with keeping the demographic balance in favor of its Jewish citizens. Subsequent Israeli Ministers of Interior have implemented different policies with regards to the family unification process. In 2001, Eli Yishai, interior minister at the time actively created obstacles for non-Jewish applicants to receive Israeli residency or citizenship and lobbied in the Knesset in order to set legal policies that would support his decisions. On May 12, 2002 the government decided to freeze all unification cases for the Palestinian spouse of an Israeli citizen or permanent resident (Government Decision #1813). The decision also stipulated the rejection of any new applications. This was followed in 2003 with the Law of Nationality and Entry into Israel (Temporary Order 2003) being enacted and it has been repeatedly extended since then. Its main provisions are based on Government Decision #1813. The State of Israel considered family unification a subversive method used by Palestinians in order to exercise their "right of return" It also upheld the notion that it was exploitative in nature, as residents and citizens were given access to health and other benefits that were not available in the Occupied Territories. It also became concerned with the fact that there were some applications for family unification for spouses from so called "enemy states" with Israel, such as Syria, Lebanon, Iran and Iraq. Therefore, in January 2007, the Nationality and Entry into Israel Law of 2003 was again extended, to include the aforementioned provision as well as a provision for the Ministry of Interior to reject or accept applications for spouses of countries not on the list based on its discretion. Human Rights and the Discriminatory Policy regarding Family Reunification: The Israeli policy to deny reunification and in some cases registration for children is in contravention to Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Government Decision #1813 "severely violates the fundamental rights of individuals to equality, liberty, privacy and family life, as it limits the ability of Israeli citizens', namely Palestinian citizens of Israel, to exercise these rights based on the ethnicity of their spouses." Israeli law discriminates against Palestinians and prevents the right to choose a partner or begin a family, as it "explicitly denies rights on the basis of national origin... Existing families will be broken up and other families will not be established." According to Article 23 of the ICCPR of 1966, the family is the "natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State." Article 10 of the covenant strictly forbids the interference with the "privacy, family, or home of a person." Although any given country can impose laws in a state of emergency, Israel has imposed a "sweeping infringement of these rights" and does not meet the condition applied for a state of emergency especially since it discriminates heavily among its citizens. East Jerusalem is classified as occupied territory under International Law; therefore, Israel is prohibited from discriminating against occupied citizens, including their individual and family rights. Israel's policy clearly victimizes families and denies these very basic rights especially to Palestinian residents of Jerusalem in an effort to drive out as many indigenous Palestinian residents of the city and maintain a Jewish majority. References and Background: * Israel and the Occupied Territories - Torn Apart: Families split by discriminatory policies. Amnesty International, July 2004 * Perpetual Limbo - Israel's Freeze on Unification of Palestinian Families in the Occupied Territories, B'Tselem, Hamoked, July 2006 * Forbidden Families - Family Unification and Child Registration in East Jerusalem, B'Tselem and Hamoked, January 2004 * Jerusalem Residency - Hamoked Activity Report 2004 (www.hamoked.org .il/items/12904_eng.pdf) * News Update, 22 January 2007, Adalah - The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel. Source: MIFTAH www.miftah.org/Display.cfm?DocId=14464&CategoryId=4

Hebron: Spitting in Babies' Faces August 7th, 2007

At approximately 2 pm (the 6th August) two internationals observed a group of 6 Israeli settler girls between the ages of 12 and 18 harassing and intimidating Palestinian residents as they walked along a Palestinian road in Tel Rumaida. The internationals witnessed the settler girls spitting in the face of a baby being carried by a family member, and insulting Palestinians with language so abusive that a soldier attempted to remove them from the area. The soldier was immediately chastised by his commanding officer, and the girls continued to walk along the road unabated, threatening residents by lunging and stamping as if about to hit them.

*************************** Hebron: Masked Settlers Attack Human Rights Worker August 7th, 2007 | At approximately 1 pm, an international human rights worker saw approximately eight masked Israeli settlers approach the edge of Tel Rumaida settlement. The masked settlers proceeded to exit the settlement and carry out a targeted attack on a human rights observer monitoring a check point. The settlers brought the HRW to the ground kicking and punching him, then continued to kick and punch him repeatedly. Two observing soldiers made some attempt to stop the attack, but this amounted only to feeble requests to stop and was accompanied by very little physical intervention. About 5 minutes after the attack began two other HRWs arrived, followed closely by 3 soldiers and managed to bring the violence to an end. The HRWs camera was stolen in the attack meaning there was no independent footage of the incident. Despite this gratuitous violence and that the attackers were still in possession of stolen property, the attackers, still with their faces covered, were escorted back to their settlement before the police could arrive. ****************

Haaretz: A visit to the jungle August 7th, 2007 By Akiva Eldar Last week the prime minister congratulated Ariel College for being elevated by the Judea and Samaria Council of Higher Education to university status. Today, Ehud Olmert is traveling to Jericho, in order to hold talks with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, on an agreement of principles (and perhaps even "agreed-upon principles") for the establishment of a Palestinian state. According to all maps, including those of our American friends, the land on which the new university sits is supposed to be an inalienable part of the new Palestinian state. How, then, should the common Palestinian citizen interpret the news about the upgrading of the large Israeli college in the very heart of the West Bank? What value could Olmert's promise to Abbas, that he will further a peace accord that will bring about an end to Israeli occupation, have in the Palestinians' eyes? It is conceivable that the prime minister had no ill intentions. Olmert, like most Israelis, has become accustomed over the past 40 years to living in a world of double meanings. Throughout history, Israeli governments have extended one hand "to peace with the Arabs" while the other hand lays further claim to the occupied territories. In order to maintain the industry of contradictions between what is said and what is done, legal experts constructed a splendid system of overpasses for the politicians. These allow the de facto annexation of Palestinian land, without the need to annex Palestinian residents. The Council for Higher Education in Judea and Samaria is one of these inventions. It is meant to enable the establishment and development of an Israeli academic institution outside the sovereign territory of the State of Israel. On the one hand the Ministry of Education recognizes the degrees the council grants and the educational programs it approves. On the other hand, the education minister declared recently that the council's decision to upgrade the college is not valid. The collapse of the Heftsiba construction company sheds light - more precisely, casts a heavy shadow - on the method that enables Israel to talk of peace while continuing to settle the territories. The system of planning and construction regulations was created in line with the requirements of dubious Jewish land salesmen, real estate companies owned by the settlers' leadership, and Palestinian front men who are ready to sell their homeland for a money. The petition to the High Court of Justice filed by the residents of the village of Bil'in and Peace Now stopped the construction in Matityahu East, a new neighborhood in the settlement of Modi'in Illit. The case brought to the fore a terrible phenomenon, in which the State Prosecutor's Office, the local authority and the Civil Administration cooperated - some of them actively and others by turning a blind eye - with a well- oiled system that stole and "laundered" Palestinian properties. Several dozen meters away, inside Israeli territory, no contractor would have gotten away with building hundreds of apartments without the necessary blueprints, building permits, and a basic examination of land ownership documents. The politicians' mixed signals are complemented by the double standards of law enforcement that enable the settlers, the true rulers of the territories, to make talk of "a political settlement" appear ridiculous. Only there is it possible for a GOC Central Command to authorize a convicted murderer, someone like Menachem Livni, a member of the Jewish underground - convicted to life imprisonment but released after seven years - to carry an M-16 rifle. Only in this land of free-for-all can the vice president of the Magistrate's Court exonerate Livni, who shot at a Palestinian truck. In the recent Supreme Court ruling affirming Livni's conviction by the District Court, Justice Edmond Levy wrote that "this reality should not be accepted, even though it takes place far from the eyes of the general public, in areas beyond the Green Line, and where it is often regarded with unacceptable forgiveness. After all, no one would allow someone within the territory of the State of Israel to carry out such an act against his neighbors, irrespective of their national identity, and remain impervious to the law." This rare observation reminds us of Ehud Barak's cute metaphor, that Israel is a "villa in a jungle." Regarding the comparison to a villa, one can argue one way or the other, but so long as the defense minister and others in the defense, political and legal establishments continue to relate to the territories around Ariel as a jungle - the prime minister can save himself a trip to Jericho in the burning August heat. ******************************* Settlers suspected as Qurdoba school set ablaze August 6, 2007 12:20pm At 12:20pm international human right workers received a call from a local Palestinian coordinator that a section of Qurdoba Girls School had been set on fire by Israeli settlers. Qurdoba girls school is located directly across from Beit Hadassah settlement. When internationals arrived, Palestinian residents and an Israeli policeman were present. They found the back screen door, which has a metal frame, had been peeled up. This was how the Israeli settlers managed to enter the school without being seen. The settlers had placed the metal frame of a bed on top of a table and set fire to it, along with pictures of the Dome of the Rock in Jerusalem. The burning heap was placed directly in front of a metal door that the children and teachers use to enter the school. The fire had been burning for about 10 minutes before nearby Palestinian residents came with buckets of water. They managed to put the fire out and keep it from spreading. The internationals documented the scene and were told by the Palestinians that an electricity wire had been cut above the fire. It was apparent that this fire was started by adult settlers as the act was quite methodical and symbolic in the way it was laid out, with the pictures (of the Dome of the Rock), and the way they broke into the school. They also managed to commit the act undetected by Palestinians which no settler child could accomplish, leading Palestinians and internationals to suspect that the act must have been planned and coordinated. Israeli soldiers also later came to survey the scene, and at one point actually said that, for all they knew, it could have been Palestinians who had started the fire. They said that their was no solid evidence that it was Israeli settlers who had started the fire. This was obviously completely wrong and offensive, since no Muslim would burn pictures of the Dome of the Rock or set fire to a Palestinian girls school. The only people who had motive to start the fire are Israeli settlers, who have in the past frequently attacked the schoolgirls and the school itself. After ten more minutes the door to the school was opened and the windows inside were opened in order to release the smoke trapped inside the school. Except for smoke damage, which was quiet extensive, there appeared to be no more damage to the school except for the cut electricity cable which will have to be repaired.

ends