Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

ACIL confused about their role in Port of Auckland dispute

ACIL confused about their role in Port of Auckland dispute

Maritime Union of New Zealand media release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday 13 September 2012

The release of an internal email today shows that ACIL is confused about their role in the Port of Auckland dispute, says the Maritime Union.

Maritime Union of New Zealand National President Garry Parsloe says despite lecturing Auckland Councillors on the difference between management and governance, ACIL CEO Gary Swift, the head of a supposedly Council Controlled Organisation was shown to be completely involved in managing the Port Company’s political and communication strategy.

Mr Swift’s protestations of what was appropriate and not appropriate for ACIL seemed to be undermined by the clear involvement he personally had in the dispute.

In an email to a POAL communications staff member, which was read to the Council, Mr Swift clearly directed her work.

Editorial note: Copy of email online at
http://www.munz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/swift_email.pdf

In the email he wrote “It is critical that we keep all the key players well informed and that the politicians are confident that the dispute is being overseen not only by the POAL board but also by ACIL. The last thing we need is political interference. If they sense that ACIL is not on top of what’s happening they may interfere and it may not go the way we want (the vote 12 to 9 was not a strong endorsement of our position)."

In response to questions at today’s Auckland Council Accountability and Performance Committee meeting, Mr Swift was unable to provide Councillors with information on the costs of the longstanding Ports of Auckland dispute.

Councillors raised concerns about the costs of the dispute including the widespread use of PR and industrial relations consultants and extensive legal costs.

Mr Swift said that knowing such costs was inappropriate at a governance level, but that ACIL had not seen anything in the quarterly reports of POAL to warrant their concern.

Mr Parsloe says it is astounding that POAL, wholly owned by ACIL on behalf of the people of Auckland, has not been subject to a thorough analysis of the costs of the long standing dispute.

The ACIL Statement of Intent specifically makes them “accountable for the prudent governance and management” of the investments they hold on behalf of the Auckland Council.

Mr Parsloe says if ACIL are not willing to ask the questions, who is holding the Port Company accountable to the people of Auckland?

As Councillor Mike Lee said, If you don't know the cost – you can't count it, you can't measure it, you can't manage or govern it.

Mr Parsloe says the facts of the matter are the contents of Mr Swift's email shows that ACIL does not have the hands off role in this dispute they claim to have.

He says the email also shows Mr Swift's complete contempt for the elected representatives of the people of Auckland, who should be requiring accountability in what is a matter of significant public interest.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines


Gordon Campbell: On How National’s ”New” Welfare Plan Resurrects A Past Failure


Sam Uffindell’s defenders keep reminding us that he was only 16 at the time of the King’s College incident, and haven’t we all done things in our teens that, as adults, we look back on with shame and embarrassment? True. Let's be honest. Haven’t we all at one time or another, joined a gang and beaten a smaller, younger kid black and blue with wooden clubs? In that respect, Uffindell’s defenders on the streets of Tauranga risk sounding a bit like the psychiatrist Kargol played by Graham Chapman on Monty Python. Some of the media commentary has also noted how the Uffindell saga has taken the shine off National’s good poll results and distracted us all from the unveiling of an important welfare policy at the recent National Patty conference. OK… So let's put the spotlight back on that welfare policy...
More>>




 
 

National: Food Prices Climb Taking Kiwis Backwards
Kiwi families continue to battle runaway food prices, National’s Finance spokesperson Nicola Willis says... More>>



Transport & Infrastructure: Have Your Say On The Future Of Inter-regional Passenger Rail In New Zealand

The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has opened an inquiry into the future of inter-regional passenger rail in New Zealand. The aim of the inquiry is to find out what the future could hold for inter-regional passenger rail... More>>


National: Sam Uffindell Stood Down Pending Investigation
Tauranga MP Sam Uffindell has been stood down from the National Party caucus pending an investigation into further allegations about his past behaviour, says National Party Leader Christopher Luxon... More>>



Government: Tax Break To Boost Long-term Rental Supply
The Government is encouraging more long-term rental options by giving developers tax relief for as long as the homes are held as long-term rentals, the Housing Minister Megan Woods has announced... More>>


National: NZ Migrant Arrivals Hit Lowest Mark Since 1990s
Today’s net migration figures show that Labour has failed to deliver the desperately needed skilled migrants they promised, meaning labour shortages will persist into the future, National’s Immigration spokesperson Erica Stanford says... More>>


Green Party: Abuse Revelations Leave No Choice But To Overhaul RSE Scheme
The Green Party is calling on the Government to overhaul the Recognised Seasonal Employers scheme in the wake of revelations of shocking human rights violations... More>>

 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

InfoPages News Channels